Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:20:40.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of body condition at calving and dietary protein content on dry-matter intake and performance in lactating dairy cows given diets of low energy content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. P. Jones  and
P. C. Garnsworthy
G. P. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
P. C. Garnsworthy
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
Get access

Abstract

Four groups of six cows were fed from 12 weeks before calving to achieve condition scores at calving of 3·15 (F) and 2·15 (T). For the first 20 weeks of lactation all cows were given 8 kg concentrate (13·93 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per kg dry matter (DM), 200 g crude protein (CP) per kg DM) which contained either a high or a low dietary concentration of undegradable dietary protein (UDP) (70 g/kg DM, H, and 49 g/kg DM, L) and 3 kg sugar-beet pulp. Hay was also offered ad libitum.

There was no significant effect of treatment on milk yields over the first 20 weeks of lactation (overall mean yield 27·3 (s.e. 3·65) kg/day) but cows in group FL tended to produce less (P > 005). Milk composition was similar for all groups (48·8 (s.e. 5·12) g fat per kg, 27·2 (s.e. 1·48) g protein per kg and 49·0 (s.e. 2·52) g lactose per kg). DM intakes for groups FH, FL, TH and TL were 18·1, 16·9, 17·5 and 18·2 (s.e.d. 0·58) kg/day, respectively (TL v. FL, P < 0·05; FH v. FL, P < 0·05). Mean condition scores for groups FH, FL, TH and TL respectively, were 3·T7, 3·13, 2·21 and 2·08 (s.e.d. 0·18) at calving; 2·25, 2·50, 2·21 and 1·83 (s.e.d. 0·27) in week 10; and 2·46, 2·83, 2·46 and 1·96 (s.e.d. 0·35) in week 20, of lactation. Groups FH, FL, TH and TL lost proportionately 0·09, 0·02, 0·01 and 0·04 (s.e.d. 0·035) of their calving live weights, respectively, over 20 weeks of lactation.

It is concluded that increasing the supply of UDP to cows which are fat at calving results in a greater negative energy balance and a small though non-significant increase in mobilization of body fat reserves. At the dietary ME and protein concentrations used, the thin cows could not respond to increased UDP supply and their intake was limited by physical restriction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , December 1988 , pp. 321 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, Supplement No. I. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. 1980. Responses to abomasal infusions of casein plus methionine in lactating ewes fed fresh pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blauwiekel, R. and Kincaid, R. L. 1986. Effect of crude protein and solubility on performance and blood constituents of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2091–2098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boisclair, Y., Grieve, D. G., Stone, J. B., Allen, O. B. and MaCleod, G. K. 1986. Effect of prepartum energy, body condition, and sodium bicarbonate on production of cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2636–2647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BP. 1979. In Facts. BP Nutrition Ltd. Northwich.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution. 1955. Gerber method for the determination of fat in milk and milk products. British Standard 696, Paris 1 and 2. British Standards Institution, London.Google Scholar
Cocimano, M. R. and Leng, R. A. 1967. Metabolism of urea in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 21: 353–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
East of Scotland College of Agriculture. 1976. Condition scoring — dairy cows. Advisory Leaflet, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, No. 100.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988. The effect of energy reserves at calving on performance of dairy cows. In Nutrition and Lactation in the Dairy Cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 157–170. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Jones, G. P. 1987. The influence of body condition at calving and dietary protein supply on voluntary food intake and performance in dairy cows. Animal Production 44: 347–353.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Topps, J. H. 1982a. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Animal Production 35: 113–119.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Topps, J. H. 1982b. The effects of body condition at calving, food intake and performance in early lactation on blood composition of dairy cows given complete diets. Animal Production 35: 121–125.Google Scholar
Gow, C. B., Ranawana, S. S. E., Kellaway, R. C. and McDowell, G. H. 1979. Responses to post-ruminal infusions of casein and arginine, and to dietary protein supplements in lactating goats. British Journal of Nutrition 41: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grovum, W. L. and Williams, V. J. 1977. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 6. The effect of level of food intake on mathematical predictions of the kinetics of digesta in the reticulorumen and intestines. British Journal of Nutrition 38: 425–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutmann, I. and Bergmeyer, H. U. 1974. Urea. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. 2nd English ed.. p. 1791. Verlag Chemie Weinheim and Academic Press. New York.Google Scholar
Holter, J. B., Hylion, W. E. and Bozak, C. K. 1985. Varying protein content and nitrogen solubility for pluriparous, lactating Holstein cows: lactation performance and profitability. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 1984–1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicki, F. J., Holter, J. B. and Hayes, H. H. 1985. Varying protein content and nitrogen solubility for pluriparous, lactating Holstein cows: digestive performance during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 1995–2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Journet, M. and Remond, B. 1976. Physiological factors affecting the voluntary intake of feed by cows: a review. Livestock Production Science 3: 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1984. Genstat V, Mark 4.04B. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. and Somerville, S. 1973. Condition scoring of cattle. Bulletin, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, No. 6.Google Scholar
Lundquist, R. G., Otterby, D. E. and Linn, J. G. 1986. Influence of formaldehyde-treated soybean meal on milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 1337–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllan, A. B. and Smith, R. H. 1983. Factor s influencing th e digestion of dietary carbohydrates between the mouth and abomasum of steers. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansion, R.Russell, A. M., Dew, S. M. and Payne, J. M. 1975. The influence of dietary protein upon blood composition in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 96: 497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, D. R., Whitthmore, C. T., Lewis, M., Aalliston, J. C., Roberts, D. J., Hodgson-Jones, L. S., Mills, J., Parkinson, H. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1983. Production characteristics of high-yielding dairy cows. Animal Production 36: 321–334.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. 1981. Patterns of nutrient utilisation — implications for nitrogen metabolism. Joint Research Co-ordination Meeting of Food and Agriculture Organisation/International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Atomic Energy in Food and Agriculture, Vienna.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Brostkr, J. A., Napper, D. J. and Sivitkr, J. W. 1979. The effects of a low-protein ration on milk yield and plasma metabolites in Friesian heifers during early lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 42: 149–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldham, J. D., Hart, I. C. and Bines, J. A. 1978. Effect of abomasal infusions of casein, arginine, methionine or phenylalanine on growth hormone, insulin, prolactin, thyroxine and some metabolites in blood from lactating goats. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 37: 9A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
Oldham, J. D., Napper, D. J., Smith, T. and Fulford, R. J. 1985. Performance of dairy cows offered isonitrogenous diets containing urea or fishmeal in early and in mid-lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 53: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 449–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B. 1979. Complete Diets for Cattle and Sheep. Farming Press, Ipswich.Google Scholar
Peel, C. J., Bauman, D. E., Gorewit, R. C. and Sniffen, C. J. 1981. Effect of exogenous growth hormone on lactational performance in high yielding dairy cows. Journal of Nutrition 111: 1662–1671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynaert, R., De Paepf, M., Marcus, S. and Peeters, G. 1975. Influence of serum free fatty acid levels on growth hormone secretion in lactating cows. Journal of Endocrinology 66: 213–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, C. J., Reid, I. M., Rowlands, G. J. and Patterson, A. 1981. A fat mobilisation syndrome in dairy cows in early lactation. Veterinary Record 108: 7–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. D., Perkins, B. L., Sniffen, C. J. and Pearson, E. G. 1984. Body condition and fatty liver in dairy cows. Is there a relationship with reproductive performance? Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference, Syracuse, New York, pp. 20–25.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. and Morant, S. V. 1987. The effects of nutrition on milk fat and protein. Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Lisbon, pp. 652–653.Google Scholar
Swan, A. A. 1979. Hormone — metabolite relationships in lactating dairy cows. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R. 1976. An assessment of the value of plasma urea nitrogen and albumin concentrations as monitors of the protein status of sheep. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production (ed. Lister, D.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 1, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
Treacher, R. J. 1976. Dietary protein levels and blood composition of dairy cattle. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production (ed. Lister, D.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 1, pp. 133–142.Google Scholar
Treacher, R. J., Reid, I. M. and Roberts, C. J. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 1–6.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Agricultural Supply Trade Association, Agricultural Development and Advisory Services and Council of Scottish Agricultural Colleges. 1985. Prediction of energy values of compound feed. The Report of an UKASTA/ADAS/COSAC Working Party. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; London.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Boyne, A. W. 1981. Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit, Rowett Research Unit, Third Report. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Werner, W., Rey, H. G. and Weilinger, H. 1970. [On the properties of a new chromagen for the determination of glucose in blood according to the GOD/POD-Method]. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie 252: 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, E. E., Jones, G. M., Wagner, P. E., Boman, R. L., Troutt, H. F. and Lesch, T. N. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar