Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:04:26.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of a grazing period on performance of finishing bulls: comparison with an indoor finishing system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Dufrasne ,
M. Gielen ,
P. Limbourg ,
C. van Eenaeme  and
L. Istasse
I. Dufrasne
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire-B43, Service dc Nutrition, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
M. Gielen
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire-B43, Service dc Nutrition, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
P. Limbourg
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire-B43, Service dc Nutrition, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium Centre de Recherche Agronomique, Rue de Serpont 100, 6800 Libramont, Belgium
C. van Eenaeme
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire-B43, Service dc Nutrition, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
L. Istasse
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire-B43, Service dc Nutrition, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

A comparison was made between two different finishing systems with Belgian Blue bulls. Two groups of bulls were grazed during an initial 140-day period and then finished indoors with concentrates. There were two stocking rates during the grazing period: a medium at six bulls per ha (MGFI) and a high at eight bulls per ha (HGFI). A third group of bulls was finished indoors on a concentrate diet during the whole finishing period (FI). The experiment was repeated over 2 years consecutively. The pasture which was grazed at the medium stocking rate was characterized by a higher sward height (P < 0·01), more refusals (P < 0·001), less Lolium perenne (P < 0·05) and more Trifolium repens (P<0·05) than that grazed at eight bulls per ha. The live-weight gain was 1·15 kg/day during the grazing period for the MGFI bulls and 1·00 kg/day when they were taken indoors. The increase in stocking rate reduced the gain at grass (1·00 kg/day, P < 0·001) and improved the gain indoors (1·24 v. 1·01 kg/day, P < 0·001). In the groups which were initially grazed when compared with the indoor system, the fattening period was longer (236·0 and 241·0 v. 186·9 days, P<0·01) and the live-weight gain lower (1·11 and 1·10 v. 1·44 kg/day, P < 0·001 for MGFI, HGFI and Fl respectively). The dressing proportion was greater also (P < 0·05), and there were higher concentrations of muscles (P < 0·05) and bones (P < 0·05) in the carcass of the bulls which were grazed initially. With these bulls, the lean meat was darker (P<0·05) and lost more water although there were no effects on the myoglobin content or on shear force. The net profit was in favour of the groups which were grazed.

Keywords

bullscarcass compositionfattening performancegrazing systems
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 75 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Berge, P., Geay, Y. and Micol, D. 1991. Effect of feeds and growth rate during the growing phase on subsequent performance during the fattening period and carcass composition in young dairy breed bulls. Livestock Production Science 28: 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boakye, K. and Mittal, G. S. 1993. Changes in pH and water holding properties of longissimus dorsi muscle during beef ageing. Meat Science 34: 335–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boccard, R., Butcher, L., Casteels, E., Consentino, E., Dransfield, E., Hood, D. E., Joseph, R. L., MacDougall, D. B., Rhodes, D. N., Schon, I., Tinbergen, B. J. and Tourraille, C. 1981. Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments. Report of a working group in the Commission of the European Communities (CEC) beef production research programme. Livestock Production Science 8: 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, G. E., Johnson, D. E., Ellenberger, M. A. and Tatum, J. D. 1991. Physical and chemical components of the empty body during compensatory growth in beef steers. Journal of Animal Sciences 69: 3251–3264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinquart, A., Istasse, L., Dufrasne, I., Mayombo, A., Eenaeme, C. van and Bienfait, J. M. 1991. Effects on animal performance and fat composition of two fat concentrates in diets for growing-fattening bulls. Animal Production 53: 315–320.Google Scholar
Dagnelie, P. 1975. Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Vol. 2. Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux Editeurs.Google Scholar
Dufrasne, I., Istasse, L., Gielen, M., Midy, G. and Bienfait, J. M. 1991. Influence of stage of maturity of maize silage on animal performance. Proceedings of the forty-second annual meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Berlin, vol. 2, pp. 424–425.Google Scholar
Eenaeme, C. van, Istasse, L., Gabriel, A., Clinquart, A., Maghuin-Rogister, G. and Bienfait, J. M. 1990. Effects of dietary carbohydrate composition on rumen fermentation, plasma hormones and metabolites in growing-fattening bulls. Animal Production 50: 409–416.Google Scholar
Flipot, P. M., Dionne, J. L., Lalande, G. and Girard, J. M. 1986. Effect of different feed treatments on growth and food efficiency of young Holstein bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66: 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, R. J. 1982. A comparison of the growth and carcass characteristics of steers reared on pasture and finished for varying periods on corn or grass silage. Canadian journal of Animal Science 62: 1079–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, R. J. and Vanderstoep, J. 1985. A comparison of grass and corn silages for finished steers. Canadian journal of Animal Sciences 65: 769–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovanni, R. 1990. La prairie graminée-trèfle blanc. II. Production fourragère et pâturage par des jeunes taurillons laitiers. Fourrages 122: 139–158.Google Scholar
Grau, R. and Hamm, R. 1957. Uber das wasserbindungsvermogen des Säugetiermusckels. II. Mitteilung. Über die bestimmung der wasserbindung des muskel. Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel Untersuchung und Forschung 105: 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. and Holmes, W. 1974. The effect of nitrogen, stocking rate and grazing method on the output of pasture grazed by beef cattle. Journal of British Grassland Society 29: 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrie, R. A. 1991. The eating quality of meat. In Meat science. 5th ed. pp. 184–224. Pergamon Press, Headington Hile Hall.Google Scholar
Perry, T. W., Huber, D. A., Mott, G. O., Rhykerd, C. L. and Taylor, R. W. 1972. Effect of level of pasture supplementation on pasture, drylot and total performance of beef cattle. II. Spring plus summer pasture. Journal of Animal Science 34: 647–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rompala, R. E., Jones, S. D. M., Buchanan-Smith, J. G. and Bayley, H. S. 1985. Feedlot performance and composition of gain in late-maturing steers exhibiting normal and compensatory growth. Journal of Animal Science 61: 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1994. A comparison of pasture grazing and storage feeding and the effects of sward surface height and concentrate supplementation from 5 to 10 months of age on the lifetime performance and carcass composition of bulls. Animal Production 58: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umoh, J. E. and Holmes, W. 1974. The influence of type and level of supplementary feed on intake and performance of beef cattle on pasture. Journal of British Grassland Society 29: 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1991. Changes in the body composition of beef cattle during compensatory growth. Animal Production 52: 105–113.Google Scholar