Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:02:01.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect on litter size of increased feed intake during the oestrus period in the sow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. H. Brooks  and
D. J. A. Cole
P. H. Brooks
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 3RD
D. J. A. Cole
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 3RD
Get access

Summary

A field trial was conducted at 13 centres to investigate the effect of increasing feed intake on the day of mating on litter size of sows. From weaning to mating, control animals received 1·8, 2·3 or 2·7 kg food/day depending on the managemental procedure of the centre. Flushed animals were fed in the same way except on the day of mating when their feed allocation was doubled. Flushing did not significantly affect litter size when the overall results of all centres were considered (447 sows). Results for individual centres were also examined. A significant response to ‘flushing’ was obtained at only one of the 13 centres, where increasing feed intake from 2·7 to 5·4 kg on the day of mating significantly (P < 0·05) increased litter size by 1·3 ±0·52 pigs born.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 241 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1970. The effects of short-term flushing on reproductive performance of sows and gilts. Anim. Prod. 12: 375 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1971. The effect of increasing feed intake for one day only during the oestrus period on the reproductive performance of sows. Anim. Prod. 13: 669–675.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H., Cooper, K. J., Lamming, G. E. and Cole, D. J. A. 1972. The effect of feed level during oestrus on ovulation rate in the gilt. J. Reprod. Fert. (in press).Google Scholar
Hardy, B. and Lodge, G. A. 1969. The influence of nutrition during post lactational oestrus on ovulation rate in the sow and the accuracy of corpora lutea counts in estima-ting ovulations. J. Reprod. Fert. 19: 555–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, F. C., Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E. 1967. The influence of plane of nutrition in early pregnancy on the survival and development of embryos in the sow. J. Reprod. Fert. 13: 269–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempthorne, O. 1952. The Design and Analysis of Experiments. J. Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R. L., Howland, B. E., First, N. L. and Casida, L. E. 1967. Ovarian and pituitary changes in gilts on two nutrient energy levels. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 358–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libal, G. N. and Wahlstrom, R. C. 1970. The influence of energy during oestrus on ovulation rate. 14th Swine Day Rep. S. Dak. agric. Exp. Stn, pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. and Hardy, B. 1968. The influence of nutrition during oestrus on ovulation rate in the sow. J. Reprod. Fert. 15: 329–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moody, N. W. and Speer, V. C. 1971. Factors affecting sow farrowing interval. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 510–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. P., Dutt, R. H., Hays, V. W. and Cromwell, G. L. 1971. One day vs. 14-day flushing effects on reproduction. J. Anim. Sci. 32: 387 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. 1968. Some results of Danish research into the nutrition of pregnant and lactating sows. In Technical and Economic Aspects of Pig Feeding. Int. Conv. Reggio Emilia, Italy, 1967.Google Scholar
Walker, N. 1972. A note on the effect of ‘Flushing’ after weaning on the productivity of sows. Rec. Agric. Res. N. Ire. 20: in press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. R., Spies, H. G., Self, H. L. and Casida, L. E. 1960. Ovulation rate in swine as affected by increased energy intake just prior to ovulation. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar