Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:45:51.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of water sprinkling during the hot-dry summer season on semen quality of Holstein bulls in Saudi Arabia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. S. Salah ,
F. D. El-Nouty  and
M. R. Al-Hajri
M. S. Salah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, PO Box 2460, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
F. D. El-Nouty
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, PO Box 2460, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
M. R. Al-Hajri
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, PO Box 2460, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Get access

Abstract

Ten Holstein bulls, 4 to 5 years old were used to study the effect of cooling the bulls on their semen quality. Five bulls were sprinkled with water for 15 min five times a day throughout a 6-week period of the summer season (hot-dry) in Saudi Arabia, and the other five bulls acted as the control and were not sprinkled with water. Semen quality was improved significantly during the cooling period. This improvement was evident from the significant increase in sperm motility (P < 0·01) and decrease in the percentage of both dead and morphologically abnormal (primary and secondary) spermatozoa per ejaculate of cooled bulls (P < 0·01). The effect of cooling was more marked through the last 3 weeks than during the first 3 weeks of the experimental period. Ejaculate volume, sperm concentration and hence total sperm counts did not differ significantly between the cooled and the non-cooled bulls. Concerning the type of abnormal spermatozoa, the overall secondary abnormality was higher than the primary in both the cooled and the control groups, with higher values for the control (P < 0·01). Only the mid piece showed higher primary defects than the secondary. The pyriform heads, the coiled mid pieces and tails and the bent tails were the main sources of variations (P < 0·01) in the incidence of sperm abnormality between the cooled and the non-cooled bulls. Cooling the bulls during the heat stress period also lowered their rectal temperature and increased blood haemoglobin level without affecting the packed cell volume

Keywords

bullsenvironmental temperatureevaporative coolingsemen
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amir, D. and Ortavant, R. 1968. Influences de la frequence des collects sur la duree du transit des spermotozoides dans le canal epididymaire du belier. Annales de Biologie Animate, Biochhnie el Biophysique 8: 185.Google Scholar
Bahga, C. S., Matharoo, J. S., Thakur, B. C. and Dhingra, D. P. 1987. The effect of cooling on the blood composition and seminal characteristics of crossbred bulls. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences 25: 331–336.Google ScholarPubMed
Casady, R. B., Myers, R. M and Legates, J. E. 1953. The effect of exposure to high ambient temperature on spermatogenesis in the dairy bull, journal of Dairy Science 36: 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalapathy, P. V. and Rao, A. R. 1982. Effect of improved housing on semen characteristics of Jersey bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 59: 274–280.Google Scholar
Clegg, E. J. 1963. Studies on artificial cryptorchidism: degenerative and regenerative changes in the germinal epithelium of the rat testis. Journal of Endocrinology 27: 241–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dott, H. H. and Foster, G. C. 1972. A technique for studying the morphology of mammalian spermatozoa which are eosinophilic in a differential “live/dead” stain. journal of Reproduction and Fertility 29: 443–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, H. A. and Madden, F. W. 1972. Artificial insemination of dairy and beef cattle. A handbook and laboratory manual. 4th ed. Lucas Brothers Publishers, Columbia, Mo.Google Scholar
Jeyendran, R. S., Van der Vent, H. H., Perez-Pelaez, M., Crabo, B. G. and Zaneveld, L. J. D. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics, journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misra, M. S. and Sen Gupta, B. P. 1965. Climatic environment and reproductive behaviour of buffaloes. III. Observations on semen quality of buffalo bulls maintained under two different housing conditions. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 18:130–133.Google Scholar
Moule, G. R. 1965. Field investigation with sheep — a manual of techniques. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia.Google Scholar
Nakayama, H., Hidaka, R. and Ashizawa, K. 1991. Effects of testosterone injection on the semen quality in boars during high ambient temperature. Animal Reproduction Science 25: 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, W. O. 1951. Mammalian spermatogenesis: effect of experimental cryptorcidism in the rat and non-descent of the testis in man. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 6: 29–56.Google Scholar
Okamota, S., Ishii, S. and Mukai, A. 1959. Effect of scrotum cooling on the quality of the seminal fluid of the bull at high temperatures. Japanese Journal of Animal Reproduction 5: 22–29.Google Scholar
Okamoto, S., Ishii, S. and Mukai, A. 1962. Influence of high environmental temperatures on the semen quality of dairy bulls and the effect of cooling the scrotum. Bulletin of Kyushu Agricultureal Experimental Station 7: 409–418 (Animal Breeding Abstracts 32:168).Google Scholar
Patrick, T. E., Kellgren, H. C, Johnston, J. E., Hindery, G., Shelwick, J. O. and Bankston, J. 1959. Effect of air conditioning and other cooling practices on physiological responses, semen production, and fertility of bull under southern conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 42: 394 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Payne, J. M. 1956. The degenerative change in the adult mouse testis returned to the abdominal cavity. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 71:117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, J. and Riemerschmid, G. 1941. A preliminary note on the intra-testicular temperature and the scrotal skin temperature of the bull and its relation to air, skin and body temperature. Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 16: 299–312.Google Scholar
Rao, R. M. and Rao, A. R. 1975. Studies on semen characteristics of Tharparkar and Jersey bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 52: 889–900.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1986. SAS users' guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar