Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:05:25.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of varying levels of coconut oil on intake, digestibility and methane output from continental cross beef heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2007

E. Jordan ,
D. K. Lovett ,
M. Hawkins ,
J. J. Callan  and
F.P. O'Mara
E. Jordan
Affiliation:
UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Lyons Research Farm, University College Dublin, Newcastle, Dublin, Ireland
D. K. Lovett
Affiliation:
UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Lyons Research Farm, University College Dublin, Newcastle, Dublin, Ireland
M. Hawkins
Affiliation:
UCD School of Mathematical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
J. J. Callan
Affiliation:
UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Lyons Research Farm, University College Dublin, Newcastle, Dublin, Ireland
F.P. O'Mara*
Affiliation:
UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Lyons Research Farm, University College Dublin, Newcastle, Dublin, Ireland
*
†UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Agriculture and Food Science CentreUniversity College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This experiment sought to establish the response to increasing levels of coconut oil (CO) supplementation with a fixed 0·50:0·50 forage:concentrate diet on intake, digestibility and methane (CH4) emissions. Sixteen continental cross beef heifers (mean starting weight 481±36 kg) were assigned randomly to one of four levels of CO; 0 g/day, 125 g/day, 250 g/day or 375 g/day in an incomplete (three periods) multiple (no. =4) Latin-square design experiment (no. =12 per treatment). A linear reduction in CH4 output occurred as the level of CO in the diet increased ( P<0·001) with the greatest reduction at the 375 g/day level (394, 341, 314 and 240 l/day for animals fed 0, 125, 250 and 375 g/day CO, respectively). As the level of CO increased dry-matter (DM) intake (DMI) decreased, however these differences were only statistically significant at the 375 g/day level ( P <0·001). The proportional reduction in CH4 output was greater than the proportional reduction in DMI and hence CH4 l/kg DMI decreased from 39·8 l/kg when no CO was given to 29·7 l/kg when 375 g/day CO was given. The addition of CO to the diet resulted in a significant decline in dry-matter digestibility (DMD) at the 375 g/day level (P<0·05). These data demonstrate that the inclusion of CO at levels from 0·013 to 0·045 of the dietary DM within a 0·50:0·50 silage and concentrate ration reduces CH4 production with no adverse effect on DMI or DMD up to the 250 g/day level (0·027 of dietary DM).

Keywords

beef heiferscoconut oilforage to concentrate ratiomethane
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 859 - 865
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990) Official methods of analysis 14th ed. Arlington, VA AOAC.Google Scholar
Demeyer, DI (1987) Interdependence des effects de la defaunation sur l'activite muralttique, le volume et la cinetique du contenu de rumen. Resultats preliminaries et hypotheses Reproduction Nutrition Development 27: 161–162.Google Scholar
Dohme, F.Machmüller, A.Estermann, BLPfister, P.Wasserfallen, A.Kreuzer, M. (1999) The role of the rumen ciliate protozoa for methane suppression caused by coconut oil Letters in Applied Microbiology 29: 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y.Bae, HDMcAllister, TAMathison, GWCheng, KJ (1997) Lipid-induced depression of methane production & digestibility in the artificial rumen system (RUSITEC) Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Community. 1984. Marketing of Feedstuffs Regulations. 5·5 Determination of volatile nitrogenous bases. 5·2·2. Distillation method. Statutory Instrument no. 200/1984. Irish Statute Book. Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Finlay, BJEsteban, G.Clarke, KJWilliams, AGEmbley, TMHirt, RR (1994) Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens FEMS Microbiology Letters 117: 157–162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, RS (1999) Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 1321–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland National Inventory Report. (2003) Greenhouse gas emissions 1990–2001 Reported to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Environmental Protection Agency Wexford, Ireland Johnstown Castle EstateGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K.Huyler, M.Westburg, H.Lamb, B.Zimmerman, P. (1994) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock. Using a SF6 tracer technique Environmental Science and Technology 28: 359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouany, JPUshida, V. (1999) The role of protozoa in feed digestion Australian Journal of Agricultural Science 12: 125–139Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. (1999) Genstat 6, version 6.1 Harpenden Rothamsted Experimental StationGoogle Scholar
Lovett, D.Lovell, S.Stack, L.Callan, J.Finlay, M.Connolly, J.O'Mara, FP (2003) Effect of forage:concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers Livestock Production Science 84: 135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrabb, GJKurihara, M.Hunter, RA (1998) The effect of finishing strategy on lifetime methane production for beef cattle in northern Australia Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 22: 55 (abstr.)Google Scholar
Machmüller, A.Kreuzer, M. (1999) Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79: 65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machmüller, A.Soliva, CRKreuzer, M. (2003) Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep Reproduction Nutrition and Development 43: 41–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machmüller, A.Ossowski, DAWanner, M.Kreuzer, M. (1998) Potential of various fatty feeds to reduce methane release from rumen fermentation in vitro (RUSITEC) Animal Feed Science and Technology 71: 117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, SA (1998) Manipulation of ruminal fermentation with organic acids: a review Journal of Animal Science 76: 3123–3132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moe, PWTyrrell, HF (1979) Methane production in dairy cows Journal of Dairy Science 62: 1583–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, CJChamberlain, DG (1988) Lipids as defaunating agents Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 47: 154 (abstr.)Google Scholar
Playne, MJMcDonald, P. (1996) The buffering constituents of herbage and silage Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 17: 264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, JDKnight, R.McAllan, ABSmith, RH (1983) Digestion and synthesis in the rumen of sheep given diets supplemented with free and protected oils British Journal of Nutrition 49: 419–432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ushida, K.Tokura, M.Takenaka, A.Itabashi, H. (1997) Ciliate protozoa and ruminal methanogensis. In Rumen microbes and digestive physiology in ruminants (ed. R., Onodera) pp. 209–220S. Karger Basel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Van Nevel, CJ and Demeyer, DI (1996) Control of rumen methanogenesis Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42: 73–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ (1973) Collaborative study of acid detergent fibre and lignin Journal of Official Analytical Chemists 50: 781–784Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJRobertson, JBLewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, AGColeman, GS (1988) The rumen protozoa The rumen microbial ecosystem 77–128 (ed. Hobson, PN) Elsevier Applied Science New YorkGoogle Scholar
Williams, CHDavid, DJIismaa, O. (1962) The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry Journal of Agricultural Science 59: 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar