Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:29:54.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of various factors on the efficacy of tylosin as a growth promoter in clinically healthy pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Lilly Research Centre Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey GU20 6PH
M. E. Tarrant
Affiliation:
Lilly Research Centre Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey GU20 6PH
Get access

Abstract

Nineteen field trials were conducted in eight 1 uropean countries to examine the effects of tylosin, administered in the food at a level of 20mg/kg to healthy pigs under good management conditions. Average daily gain and food conversion ratio were improved by 33 g and 0·17 respectively over untreated control animals, with no change in average daily food consumption. These improvements in growth performance were similar in the grower and finisher phases, and the response to tylosin was not affected by sex, initial weight or year. Absolute responses in average daily gain and efficiency of food utilization were constant, whatever the level of performance in the controls.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braude, R., Wallace, H. D. and Cunha, T. J. 1953. The value of antibiotics in the nutrition of swine. A review. Antibiotics Chemother. 3: 271291.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, P. W. 1978. The use of tylosin to improve the growth performance of clinically healthy pigs. Proc. 5th Wld Congr. Int. Pig Vet. Soc., Zagreb. K.B. 39.Google Scholar
Jordan, C. E., Waitt, W. P. and Means, T. M. 1960. Tylosin—a new antibiotic growth stimulant for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 1269 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Melliere, A. L., Brown, H. and Rathmacher, R. P. 1973. Finishing swine performance and responses to tylosin. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 286 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System. 1979. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Vervaeke, I. J., Decuypere, J. A., Dierick, N. A. and Henderickx, H. K. 1979. Quantitative in vitro evaluation of the energy metabolism influenced by virginiamycin and spiramycin used as growth promoters in pig nutrition. Anim. Sci. 49: 846856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visek, W. J. 1978. The mode of growth promotion by antibiotics. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 14471469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachholz, D. E. and Heidenreich, C. J. 1970. Effect of tylosin on swine growth in two environments. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 1014 (Abstr.).Google Scholar