Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:42:26.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of supplementing straw with barley or unmolassed sugar-beet pulp on microbial protein supply in sheep estimated from urinary purine derivative excretion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

X. B. Chen ,
S. A. Abdulrazak ,
W. J. Shand  and
E. R. Ørskov
X. B. Chen
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
S. A. Abdulrazak
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
W. J. Shand
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Four sheep (live weight 39 to 42 kg) fitted with rumen cannulas were offered ammonia-treated barley straw alone (control) or supplemented with unmolassed sugar-beet pulp or rolled barley at 0·20 or 0·40 of the total diet on a fresh weight basis (SBP20, SBP40, B20 and B40, respectively) using a 4 × 5 randomized block design. Total diet intakes were 710, 873, 1054, 843 and 1021 g dry matter per day for control, SBP20, SBP40, B20 and B40 respectively. The intake of straw was depressed significantly with SBP40 and B40 (P < 0·05). Rumen pH and ammonia concentration decreased, and total volatile fatty acid concentrations increased (P < 0·05) with increasing level of supplementation for both supplements. Rumen liquid outflow rate was affected little by the supplementation although this measurement for B40 was significantly higher than that for the other treatments. Microbial protein supply, estimated from urinary excretion of purine derivatives, increased significantly with the increasing amounts of supplements (4·5, 6·7, 8·5, 7·1 and 9·0 (s.e.d. 0·73) g N per day for control, SBP20, SBP40, B20 and B40 respectively) (P < 0·05). The calculated efficiency of microbial protein production was 12·8, 14·2, 14·3, 15·7 and 14·5 (s.e.d. 1·45) g N per kg digestible organic matter intake (DOMI) for the five treatments. Although this value was lowest with the control, differences between treatments were not significant (P > 0·05). It seems that microbial protein yield per unit DOMI for a diet based on ammonia-treated straw could not be improved substantially by supplementation with sugar-beet pulp or barley.

Keywords

microbial proteinpurinessheepstraw
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 413 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulrazak, S. A., Chen, X. B. and Ørskov, E. R. 1992. The effect of supplementing ammonia-treated straw with sugar-beet pulp or barley on rumen kinetics and microbial protein production. Animal Production 54: 506 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Chen, X. B., Hovell, F. D. DeB., Ørskov, E. R. and Brown, D. S. 1990. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of exogenous nucleic acid supply on purine derivative excretion by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 63: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X. B., Mathieson, J., Hovell, F. D. DeB. and Reeds, P. J. 1990. Measurement of purine derivatives in urine of ruminants using automated methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 53: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. B., Ørskov, E. R. and Hovell, F. D. DeB. 1991. The use of intragastric infusion in studies on excretion of purine derivatives as a measure of microbial protein supply in ruminants. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium protein metabolism and nutrition, vol. 2 (ed. Eggum, B. O., Boisen, S., Børsting, C., Danfaer, A., Hvelplund, T.), pp. 67–70. National Institute of Animal Science Research Centre, Foulum.Google Scholar
Chen, X. B., Chen, Y. K., Franklin, M. F., Ørskov, E. R. and Shand, W. J. 1992. The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1534–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A. W. 1970. The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculations by computer. Analyst, London 95: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahmy, S. T. M., Lee, N. H. and Ørskov, E. R. 1984. Digestion and utilization of straw. 2. Effect of different supplements on the digestion of ammonia-treated straw. Animal Production 38: 75–81.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. 1966. The rumen and microbes, p. 323. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1983. Genstat 4 user manual. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Malawer, S. J. and Powell, D. P. 1967. Improved turbidimetric analysis of P. E. G. using an emulsifier. Gastroenterology 53: 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, F. L. and Ørskov, E. R. 1984. Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in sacco, dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottenstein, D. M. and Bartley, M. 1971. Separation of free acids C2-C5 in dilute aqueous solution column method. Journal of Chromatographic Science 9: 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A. T., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Ørskov, E. R. 1989. Influence of ammonia treatment and supplementation on the intake, digestibility and weight gain of sheep and cattle on barley straw diets. Animal Production 48: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R., Cooke, G. H. and Chapman, B. T. 1967. Problems associated with the continuous monitoring of ammonia nitrogen in river water. Automation in Analytical Chemistry — Technicon Symposia, vol II, pp. 377–380. Technicon Instruments, Basingstoke.Google Scholar