Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:39:16.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of supplementing silage-based diets with soya bean and fish meals for finishing beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments have been carried out to examine the effects on the intake and performance of finishing beef cattle of supplementing grass silages (perennial ryegrass) of medium and high digestibility (MD and HD respectively) with either extracted soya-bean meal or fish meal. In each experiment, the two silages were supplemented with (1) barley (107 g crude protein (CP) per kg dry matter (DM)), (2) a mixture of barley and soya-bean meal (187 g CP per kg DM) and (3) a mixture of barley and fish meal (182 g CP per kg DM) in a 2 × 3 factorial design. The MD silages were supplemented with 4·5 kg concentrates per head daily in each experiment and the HD silages with 2·75 and 2·5 kg per head daily in experiments 1 and 2 respectively. In experiments 1 and 2 respectively the diets were offered to 72 and 60 castrated male cattle of late maturing breed type which were initially 455 (s.e. 3·6) and 484 (s.e. 3·2) kg live weight; the MD silages contained 642 and 652 g digestible organic matter (DOM) per kg DM, 119 and 114 g CP per kg DM, 72 and 68 g NH3N per kg total N, and the HD silages contained 698 and 724 g DOM per kg DM, 158 and 148 g CP per kg DM, 58 and 51 g NH3N per kg DM. In experiment 1 for the MD silages supplemented with concentrates 1, 2 and 3 and the HD silages supplemented with concentrates 1, 2 and 3 respectively silage DM intakes were 5·47, 5·29, 5·24, 6·86, 6·77 and 6·76 (s.e. 0·129) kg/day; carcass gains 0·76, 0·74, 0·72, 0·75, 0·75 and 0·79 (s.e. 0·011) kg/day; subcutaneous fat depths 6·8, 7·8, 8·0, 9·2, 7·2 and 7·1 (s.e. 0·59) mm and areas of m. longissimus 21·5, 21·7, 23·2, 21·5, 22·4 and 21·9 (s.e. 0·78) mm2/kg carcass weight. Corresponding values for experiment 2 were 6·12, 6·05, 6·18, 7·65, 7·53 and 7·36 (s.e. 0·235) kg/day; 0·82, 0·88, 0·83, 0·85, 0·89 and 0·83 (s.e. 0·042) kg/day; 8·1, 7·8, 7·5, 9·1, 8·3 and 7·4 (s.e. 0·77) mm; 22·8, 21·9, 21·9, 21·0, 21·9 and 21·7 (s.e. 0·79) mm2/kg carcass weight. It is concluded that supplementation of MD or HD grass silages with soya-bean or fish meals did not significantly affect the intake, performance or carcass fatness of finishing beef cattle although the carcasses of animals offered HD silage supplemented with barley tended to be fatter than those from the other treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 43 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended Procedures for Use in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Chappie, D. G. 1983. Protein supplementation for calves on silage diets. Animal Production 36: 513 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1973a. Supplementation of silage with protein for beef cattle. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association Journal 8: 32–41.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1973b. Supplementation of silage with protein for cattle. An Foras Taluntais Animal Production Research Report, p. 27.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1976. Supplementation of silage with protein for fattening cattle. An Foras Taluntais Animal Production Research Report, p. 21.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1983. Supplementary concentrates for young fattening bulls fed silage. An Foras Taluntais Animal Production Research Report, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Garstang, J. R. 1981. Silage supplements for calves. Animal Production 32: 355 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gill, M. and Beever, D. E. 1982. The effect of protein supplementation on digestion and glucose metabolism in young cattle fed on silage. British Journal of Nutrition 48: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J., Cuthisertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Beef carcase grading and classification. In Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing, pp. 163–201. Granada, St Albans.Google Scholar
Kirby, P. S. and Chalmers, A. J. 1981. Effect of protein supplementation of silage diets on performance of growing cattle. Animal Production 32: 387–388 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kirby, P. S., Chalmers, A. J. and Hannam, D. A. R. 1983. Fish meal supplementation of grass silage diets for fattening British Friesian steers. Animal Production 36: 538 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kirby, P. S., Outhwaite, J. R. and Jones, T. O. 1984. A comparison of two types of fish meal as protein supplements for finishing British Friesian steers given grass silage ad libitum. Animal Production 38: 551 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kirby, P. S., Outhwaite, J. R. and Jones, T. O. 1985. A comparison of formaldehyde-treated soya bean meal and fish meal as protein supplements for finishing beef cattle given grass silage. Animal Production 40: 552 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Neilson, D. R. and Hunter, E. A. 1985. The effect of growth promoters on fattening cattle: growth, intake and carcass composition. Animal Production 40: 538 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McMurray, C. H., Logan, E. F., McParland, P. J., McRory, F. J. and O'neill, D. G. 1978. Sequential changes in some blood components in the normal neonatal calf. British Veterinary Journal 134: 590–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. A. and Steen, R. W. J. 1983. The effect of silage- and hay-based diets and protein supplementation on the performance and carcass composition of beef cattle. Animal Production 36: 514 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. 1981. Amino acid requirements for lactation in high-yielding dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 33–65. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of two-cut and three-cut systems of silage making for beef cattle using two cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Animal Production 38: 171–179.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1985. Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for calves. Animal Production 41: 293–300.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1982. Utilization of conserved forages. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), Occasional Publication of the British Society of Animal Production No. 6, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1982. The utilization of silage protein. In Forage Protein Conservation and Utilization, Commission of the European Communities Seminar, Dublin, pp. 121–145.Google Scholar
Thomas, S., Reith, L., Runcie, G. M. and Hunter, E. A. 1982. The supplementation of silage-based diets with protein for finishing beef cattle. Production 34: 387 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A., Laird, R. and Arnot, D. P. 1985. Responses to protein supplements in silage-fed finishing steers: effects of silage quality and supplement type. Animal Production 40: 538 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A., Laird, R. and Holliday, R. J. 1983. A response to protein supplementation of grass silage for growing and finishing cattle. Animal Production 36: 503 (Abstr.).Google Scholar