Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:36:28.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of sex and birth status on the wool follicle population in unselected Corriedale sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. G. Butler
L. G. Butler
Affiliation:
Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

The follicle population of 44 purebred 20-month-old Corriedale ewes and rams was examined for effects due to sex and birth status. Twin birth resulted in a lower ratio of secondary to primary follicles at 20 months of age in these medium follicle-density animals. This effect is similar to that reported for the high follicle-density Australian Merino. Similarly, the ewes had a lower ratio of secondary to primary follicles than the rams.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , August 1981 , pp. 67 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, J. W. 1973. Regional body surface area of sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81: 429–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. H., Turner, Helen N. and Dolling, C. H. S. 1968. Vital statistics for an experimental flock of Merino sheep. V. The effects of age of ram, maternal handicap, and year of measurement on 10 wool and body characteristics for unselected rams. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 825–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. B. and Clarke, W. H. 1957. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of some non-Merino breeds of sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. E. and Young, S. S. Y. 1957. A study of wool production per unit area of skin in Australian Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 723–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, R. A. and Carter, H. B. 1955. The fleece growth of young Lincoln, Corriedale, Polwarth and fine Merino maiden ewes under housed conditions and unrestricted and progressively restricted feeding on a standard diet. Aust. J. agric. Res. 6: 476–513.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. and Smith, W. F. 1964. Modification of fleece development in Blackface sheep by variation in pre- and post-natal nutrition. Anim. Prod. 6: 155–167.Google Scholar
Dun, R. B. and Grewal, R. S. 1963. A comparison of the productive performance of single and twin born Merino ewes. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 3: 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. R. and Hill, M. K. 1970. Growth and wool production of single and twin-born Merino lambs reared on a high plane of nutrition. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8: 144–148.Google Scholar
Henderson, A. E. 1968. Wool follicle and fleece characters of F1 and F2 Border Leicester × Romney sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 28: 107–113.Google Scholar
Jackson, N., Nay, T. and Turner, Helen N. 1975. Response to selection in Australian Merino sheep. VII. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for some wool follicle characteristics and their correlation with wool and body traits. Aust. J. agric. Res. 26: 937–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. 1953. Follicle development in the Australian Merino. Nature, Lond. 171: 310–311.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. 1955. The relationship of skin follicle development to growth rate in sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 6: 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. and Short, B. F. 1961. The influence of nutritional level durin g pre-natal and early post-natal life on adult fleece and body characters. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 176–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, R. M. W. and Wickham, G. A. 1970. A comparison of wool follicle development of New Zealand Romney lambs at two stocking levels. N.Z. J. agric. Res. 13: 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N. 1961. Relationships among clean wool weight and its components. II. The effect of maternal handicap and its influence on selection. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 974–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N., Dolling, C. H. S. and Kennedy, J. F. 1968. Response to selection in Australian Merino sheep. I. Selection for high clean wool weight, with a ceiling on fibre diameter and degree of skin wrinkle. Response in wool and body characteristics. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 79–112.Google Scholar
Turner, Helen N. and Young, S. S. Y. 1969. Quantitative Genetics in Sheep Breeding, p. 51. Macmillan Company of Australia, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wildman, A. B. 1965. The post-natal development of the follicle population in English Romney lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65: 301–313.Google Scholar
Williams, P. M. and Henderson, A. E. 1971. Effect of nutrition of the dam on wool follicle development of Corriedale lambs. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 31: 114–120.Google Scholar