Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:46:28.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of pregnancy, energy intake and mating weight on protein deposition and energy retention of female pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. D. Deb Hovell ,
R. M. MacPherson ,
R. M. J. Crofts  and
R. I. Smart
F. D. Deb Hovell
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. M. MacPherson
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. M. J. Crofts
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. I. Smart
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Summary

1. In a comparative slaughter experiment, 12 female pigs (six at 80 kg and six at 100 kg) were allocated at first oestrus to each of five treatments: Treatment 1 initial slaughter, or Treatments 2, 3 and 4 mated and given 19·5, 25·8 or 32·1 MJ ME/day for the last 100 days of pregnancy, or Treatment 5 not mated (virgin) and given 25·8 MJ ME/day over a similar period. Pigs on Treatments 2, 3, 4 and 5 were given the same amount of protein and were killed about 123 days after first oestrus. Piglets were removed at birth.

2. Total protein deposition (carcass+viscera+piglets) was increased from a total (±SE) of 5·50 to 8·47 (±0·43) kg as ME intake was increased from 19·5 to 32·1 MJ ME/day. About 75% of the increase in protein deposition was in the carcass component. The average response to ME was 2·2 ± 0·58 g total protein deposition per MJ increment in ME.

3. The once-mated pigs deposited similar amounts of total protein to the virgin pigs but significantly less (P<0·05) carcass protein, when this was corrected to the same amount of carcass fat deposition.

4. Increasing energy intake from 19·5 to 32·1 MJ ME/day increased total fat deposition from 2·8 to 16·0 kg. The average response to ME was 13·5 ± 1·53 g fat deposited per MJ increment in ME.

5. There were no significant differences between the once-mated and virgin pigs in their calculated maintenance requirement, nor in the efficiency with which ME surplus to requirement for maintenance was utilized for energy retention. The average maintenance requirement for all pigs was 530 (95% limits 303·882) kJ/kg0·85. day. The average efficiency of utilization of ME for energy retention was 58·5 ± 6·2%.

6. There was no evidence of any pregnancy anabolism other than that involving the conceptus, the needs of the dam specific to pregnancy and preparation for lactation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 281 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. 1964. Protein metabolism and requirements in pregnancy and lactation. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism (ed. Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B.), vol. 2, pp. 173–223. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., Anderson, D. M., McDonald, I., MacPherson, R. M. and Smart, R. 1966. A comparison of the live-weight changes, nitrogen retention and carcass composition of pregnant and non-pregnant gilts. Anim. Prod. 8: 391–400.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. and MacPherson, R. M. 1972. Protein and amino acid requirements in pregnancy and lactation. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 417–434. Butter-worth, London.Google Scholar
English, P. R. 1973. Physical and economic considerations in breeding gilts for slaughter. In The Maiden Female—A Means of Increasing Meat Production (ed. Owen, J. B.), pp. 28–68. Proc. Symp. Univ. Aberdeen, 1972.Google Scholar
Franke, E. R. and Weniger, J. H. 1958. [The nitrogen, carbon and energy content of the meat and the heat value of the fat of different domestic animals.] Arch. Tieremähr. 8: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F. and Boyne, A. W. 1972. The effects of environmental temperature on the growth and metabolism of pigs given different amounts of food. 2. Energy metabolism. Br.J.Nutr. 28: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, F. C. and Lodge, G. A. 1967. Changes in body composition of the sow during pregnancy. Anim. Prod. 9: 237–245.Google Scholar
Hovell, F. D. Deb., MacPherson, R. M., Crofts, R. M. J. and Pennie, K. 1977. The effect of energy intake and mating weight on growth, carcass yield and litter size of female pigs. Anim. Prod. 25: 233–245.Google Scholar
Lenkeit, W., Gütte, J. O., Warnecke, W. and Kirchhoff, W. 1955. [Prolonged studies of external and internal metabolism of pregnant and lactating sows. 3. Relation of nitrogen retention during pregnancy to nitrogen turnover after birth when milk yield is high and when lactation is prevented.] Z. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 10: 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1972. Quantitative aspects of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 399–416. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
MacPherson, R. M., Campbell, Rosa M. and Smart, R. I. 1973. The thin sow—observations on digestive efficiency, nitrogen balance and carcass composition. Anim. Prod. 17: 287–293.Google Scholar
Pullar, J. D. and Webster, A. J. F. 1977. The energy cost of fat and protein deposition in the rat. Br. J. Nutr. 37: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon-Legagneur, E. 1965. [Some aspects of the nutritional relations between pregnancy and lactation in the sow.] Annls Zootech. 14, Hors-Série No. 1.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G. 1970. The utilization of dietary energy for protein and fat gain in growing pigs. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Schürch, A. and Wenk, C.), pp. 129–132. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Publ. No. 13. Juris, Zurich.Google Scholar