Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:05:20.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of plane of nutrition during rearing on growth, production, reproduction and health of dairy cattle. III. Milk production during the first three lactations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1960

J. A. Crichton ,
J. N. Aitken  and
A. W. Boyne
J. A. Crichton
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
J. N. Aitken
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
A. W. Boyne
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeenshire
Get access

Extract

1. The fat-corrected milk yields and butterfat and solids-not-fat percentages of the milk of heifers reared on the four planes of nutrition described in part 1 of this series are compared, i.e. high high (HH), high low (HL), low low (LL), low high (LH).

2. The most significant feature of the F.C.M. yields was the poor performance of the HL group in each lactation. When variability due to differences in lactation length had been eliminated the yields of the HL group in the first and second lactations were found to be significantly lower than those of the other treatment groups.

3. In the first lactation the mean B.F. percentages of HH, LH, HL and IX animals were respectively 3·92, 3·85, 3·81 and 3·74. These differences were significant at the 5% level. When the weekly yields and percentages of the HH and LL groups were compared it was found that the difference was almost entirely confined to the first 6 weeks of lactation. In the second and third lactations the mean B.F. percentages of all groups were similar.

4. Only in the second lactation were the S.N.F. percentages significantly different between groups. No explanation can be offered.

5. A comparison of the live-weight changes of HH and LL animals following successive calvings showed that recovery by the LL animals was most rapid immediately following first parturition and also during the first and second dry periods.

6. The plane of nutrition during rearing had no apparent effect on the pattern of change in milk yield and composition between first and third lactations, except that HH animals showed a more uniform rate of fall in S.N.F.% between one lactation and the next compared with the other three groups. Heifer lactations were longer and the milk had higher contents of B.F. and S.N.F. than later lactations.

7. The estimated feed costs of the rearing from birth to first calving of the HH, LH, HL and LL animals were markedly different.

8. The results are discussed in relation to practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , September 1960 , pp. 159 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonnier, G., Hansson, A., & Skjervold, H., 1948. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. IX. The interplay of heredity and environment on growth and yield. Ada Agric. suec, 3: 1.Google Scholar
Crichton, J. A, Aitken, J. N, & Boyne, A. W, 1959. The effect of plane of nutrition during rearing on growth, production, reproduction and health of dairy cattle. I. Growth to 24 months. Anim. Prod., 1: 145.Google Scholar
Crichton, J. A, Aitken, J. N, & Boyne, A. W, 1960. The effect of plane of nutrition during rearing on growth, production, reproduction and health of dairy cattle. II. Growth to maturity. Anim. Prod., 2: 45.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E, & Chapman, A. B, 1940. Butterfat production, reproduction, growth and longevity in relation to age at first calving. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 33: 76.Google Scholar
Flux, D. S, 1950. The effect of undernutrition before calving on the quantity and composition of milk produced by two-year-old heifers. J. agric. Sci., 40: 177.Google Scholar
Gaines, W. L, 1928. The energy basis of measuring milk yield in dairy cows. Bull. Ill. Agric. Expt. Sta., No. 308.Google Scholar
Hansen, K., & Steensberg, V., 1950. [The endurance and production of cows reared on different rations.] 246. Beretn. Forsøgslab. (Kbh.). 48 pp. (in Danish).Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M, 1954. The influence of winter nutritional depressions on growth, reproduction and production of cattle. J. agric. Sci., 44: 5.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, G., 1938. The feeding of dairy cows. Bull. Minist. Agric. (Lond.), No. 42 (revised).Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board, 1950,1951,1956/7,1958/9. Reports of the Production Division, Nos. 1, 2, 7, 9. M.M.B., Thames Ditton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H, & McGilliard, L. D, 1959. Relations between weight at first calving and milk production during the first lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 42: 1932.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., 1934. Feed consumption of dairy cattle during growth. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta., No. 338.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T, 1953. Effects of several levels of nutrition upon growth, reproduction and lactation in cattle. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf.Google Scholar