Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:57:35.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows 4. The relative effects of energy and protein intakes during lactation on the performance of sows and their piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. H. King
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia
A. C. Dunkin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Eighty-eight first-litter sows were used in a factorial experiment to examine the effects of energy and protein intakes during lactation on subsequent performance. Some received either 45 MJ (E,) or 60 to 63 MJ (E2) digestible energy per day and either 508 to 511 (P,) or 703 to 815 (P2) g crude protein per day during a 28-day lactation.

Sows on the E2P2 treatment lost less body weight during lactation than sows on the other three treatments (P < 0·05). Average live-weight losses during lactation were 21·8, 20·8, 17·8 and 9·6 kg for the E1P1, E1P2, E2P1, and E2P2 sows, respectively. The corresponding reductions in backfat measurements during lactation were 5·5, 7·9, 3·2 and 4·0 mm. Backfat losses were greater for sows given either moderate energy intakes or high protein intakes (P < 0·01).

Neither protein intake nor energy intake during lactation affected subsequent ovulation rate, but piglets sucking sows given high protein intakes grew faster, particularly during the last week of lactation, than piglets sucking sows receiving low protein intakes (P < 0·05).

Within 8 days of weaning, more sows given high intakes of protein during lactation exhibited oestrus than did sows which received lower intakes of protein (27/44 v. 14/44, x2 = 7·7, P < 0·01). Protein intake during lactation affected the nitrogen balance of sows in a similar way. The nitrogen balances were estimated during the 3rd week of lactation, and for sows given rations E1P1, E1P2, E2P1, and E2P2were -20·2, -11·5, -17·5 and -7·2 g/day respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brendemuhl, J. H., Lewis, A. J. and Peo, E. R. 1984. Effect of dietary energy and protein intake of sows during lactation on serum thyroxine and urea concentrations, and sow and litter performance. Journal of Animal Science 59: Suppl. 1, p. 246 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cox, N. M., Britt, J. H., Armstrong, W. D. and Alhusen, H. D. 1983. Effect of feeding fat and altering weaning schedule on rebreeding in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 56: 2129.Google Scholar
Duee, P. H. and Desmoulin, B. 1982. Changes in the body composition of nulliparous sows during the reproductive cycle: Effect of the dietary protein level during gestation. Proceedings of 14th French Swine Research Days, p. 11.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D., Terqui, M. and Mauleon, P. 1983. Influence of nutrition on pre-partum plasma levels of progesterone and total oestrogens and post-partum plasma levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in suckling cows. Animal Production 37: 8996.Google Scholar
King, R. H. and Dunkin, A. C. 1986. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 3. The response to graded increases in food intake during lactation. Animal Production 42: 119125.Google Scholar
King, R. H. and Williams, I. H. 1984a. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 1. Feeding level during lactation, and between weaning and mating. Animal Production 38: 241247.Google Scholar
King, R. H. and Williams, I. H. 1984b. The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. 2. Protein and energy intakes during lactation. Animal Production 38: 249256.Google Scholar
King, R. H., Williams, I. H. and Barker, I. 1984. The effect of diet during lactation on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15: 412415.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J. and Speer, V. C. 1973. Lysine requirement of the lactating sow. Journal of Animal Science 37: 104110.Google Scholar
O'grady, J. F. and Hanrahan, T. J. 1975. Influence of protein level and amino-acid supplementation of diets fed in lactation on the performance of sows and their litters. 1. Sow and litter performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 127135.Google Scholar
Reese, D. E., Moser, B. D., Peo, E. R., Lewis, A. J., Zimmerman, D. R., Kinder, J. E. and Stroup, W. W. 1982. Influence of energy intake during lactation on the interval from weaning to first estrus in sows. Journal of Animal Science 55: 590598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reese, D. E., Peo, E. R. and Lewis, A. J. 1984. Relationship of lactation energy intake and occurrence of postweaning estrus to body backfat composition in sows. Journal of Animal Science 58: 12361244.Google Scholar
Shaw, H. J. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1985. Relationship between LH, FSH and prolactin secretion and reproductive activity in the weaned sow. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 75: 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar