Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:24:27.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of nutrient density, presence of fish meal and method of feeding of unmedicated diets on early-weaned pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. H. Pike ,
M. K. Curran ,
M. Edge  and
Anne Harvey
I. H. Pike
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
M. K. Curran
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
M. Edge
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
Anne Harvey
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
Get access

Abstract

In two experiments, the first with 96 pigs from 5 weeks of age and the second with 384 pigs from 3 weeks of age, high nutrient dense diets (HND) or conventional diets (CONV) were given with (50 g/kg diet) or without fish meal, up to slaughter at 90 kg live weight. Diets were unmedicated. In both experiments pigs were given food according to scales which equalized digestible energy intakes for the HND and the CONV diets. In experiment 1 pigs were individually fed; in experiment 2 group feeding was practised with pens of 16 pigs either floor or trough fed.

There was no mortality in experiment 1, but the mortality was high in experiment 2, particularly amongst those pigs receiving the CONV diet without fish meal. In experiment 1, in the first 56 days, inclusion of fish meal in the CONV and HND diets significantly improved growth rate but food conversion efficiency was significantly improved in the CONV diet only. Overall, up to slaughter, growth rate and food conversion efficiency were significantly poorer in pigs given the CONV diet without fish meal (cf. the three other diets) but the HND diets were significantly better than the CONV diet with fish meal. In experiment 2, overall there were no significant differences in performance between floor- and trough- feeding methods, CONV diets without fish meal gave significantly poorer growth rates in the first 56 days and overall than the other three diets, between which there were no significant differences. In both periods, for food conversion efficiency, fish meal inclusion was without significant effect in the HND diets but significantly improved the CONV diets, both of which were significantly inferior to the HND diets.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 291 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1981. Copper supplementation of isonitrogenous diets for growing pigs containing white-fish meal or soya bean meal as the protein supplement. Anim. Prod. 33: 81–86.Google Scholar
Bayley, H. S. and Lewis, D. 1963. The use of fats in pigs rations. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61: 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. and Lerman, P. 1970. Protein and lysine levels in practical rations. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74: 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. and Rowell, R. G. 1966. Comparison of meal and pellets for growing pigs fed either in troughs or off the floor. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67: 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carew, L. B. and Hill, F. W. 1958. Studies on the effect of fat on metabolic efficiency of energy utilisation. Poult. Sci. 37: 1191 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A., Hardy, B. and Lewis, D. 1972. Nutrient density of pig diets. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 243–257. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Curran, M. K., Filmer, D. G. and Trapnell, M. G. 1975. Dose/response to nutrient intake in growing pigs. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. New Ser. 4: 117 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gropp, J., Erbersdobler, H. and Zucker, H. 1970. [Methionine supplementation of young pig diets with and without fish meal at two protein concentrations.] Kraftfutter 8: 375–379.Google Scholar
Infield, J. M., Annison, E. F. and Lewis, D. 1973. Influence of dietary soya bean oil on the metabolic efficiency of energy utilization in the chick. Univ. Nottingham, Dep. Appl. Biochem. Nutr., Occ. Publ. No. 1.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, N. J., Danielsen, V. and Nielsen, H. E. 1981. Increasing amounts of fish meal in diets to early weaned pigs. Newsletter. Nat. Inst. Anim. Sci. Publ. Statens Husdrybrugsfors0g, Copenhagen, No. 390.Google Scholar
Lenis, N. P. 1983. Faecal amino acid digestibility in feeding stuffs for pigs. Proc. IVth Int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Beaumont, France. Vol. II p. 427.Google Scholar
Pike, I. H. 1979. The role of fish meal in diets for pigs. Int. Ass. Fish Meal Manufacturers Tech. Bull. No. 6.Google Scholar
Ridgman, W. J. 1975. Experimentation in Biology, pp. 64–66. Blackie, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Scheibel, M. S., Coon, C. N. and Kelley, K. W. 1979. The heat increment of feeds used in poultry diets. Nutr. Rep. Int. 20: (6), 871–881.Google Scholar