Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:47:12.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of milk substitute concentration upon the intake, digestion and growth of calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. H. Ternouth ,
I. J. F. Stobo ,
J. H. B. Roy  and
A. W. Beattie
J. H. Ternouth
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
I. J. F. Stobo
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
J. H. B. Roy
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
A. W. Beattie
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4067, Queensland, Australia
Get access

Abstract

A total of 40 individually-penned British Friesian male calves were offered milk substitutes ad libitum from 2 days until 12 weeks of age. Ten milks were reconstitued from either liquid or spray-dried skim milk and a fat-filled (500 g fat per kg) powder and contained 80, 110, 140, 170 or 200 g dry matter (DM) per kg liquid. A further six calves were used in a randomized-block experiment to measure the digestibility, absorption and retention of the diets containing 80, 140 and 200 g DM per kg.

There are no significant differences in the intake, growth rate, digestibility, absorption or retention between calves given milk substitutes reconstituted from liquid or spray-dried skim milk.

At all ages, as the DM concentration of the milks increased, liquid intake decreased but DM intake and live-weight gain increased. The mean live-weight gain was 0·99, 1·13, 1·16, 1·28 and 1·27 kg/day for calves given the milk substitute diet at concentrations of 80, 110, 140, 170 and 200 g DM per kg, respectively. The DM intake to live-weight ratios were constant at all ages when live weight was expressed to the power of 0·61.

No significant adverse effect of the diets was evident from the fortnightly monitoring of jugular blood samples for packed cell volume and concentrations of glucose, urea-N, Na, total protein, albumin, globulin and haemoglobin; nor from faecal consistency, rectal temperature, heart rate and respiration rate.

There was no indication that age affected digestibility, except that digestive efficiency was reduced in calves with diarrhoea, particularly at 2 to 4 weeks of age; nor that dietary concentration influenced digestion or absorption. The true absorption of N, Ca and P from the milk diets was high with mean coefficients of 0·99, 1·01 and 0·95 respectively. The main endogenous losses of N and P occurred through the urine and of Ca through the faeces.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 151 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, J. L. 1971. A theoretical consideration of the effect of preventing rumen fermentation on the efficiency of utilization of dietary energy and protein in lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 25: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, J. M. 1971. Physiological changes affecting voluntary food intake in ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 135–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegland, R. B., Lambert, M. R., Jacobson, N. L. and Payne, L. C. 1957. Effect of dietary and managemental factors on reflex closure of the esophageal groove in the dairy calf. J. Dairy Sci. 40: 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, R. V. 1965. The effect of concentration of milk substitute on the performance of artificially reared lambs. Anim. Prod. 7: 325–332.Google Scholar
Lineweaver, J. A. and Hafez, E. S. E. 1969. Feed intake and performance in calves fed ad libitum and four times daily. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 2001–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, W., Kay, R. M., Manston, K., Rowlands, G. J. and Stark, A. J. 1977. The effects of age, live-weight gain and feed intake on the blood composition of young calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89: 291–296.Google Scholar
Manston, R., Rowlands, G. J., Little, W. and Collis, K. A. 1981. Variability of the blood composition of dairy cows in relation to time of day. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 96: 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. P. and Smith, K. L. 1970. Effect of different milks and levels of intake upon growth of young dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 53: 1622–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. P. and Smith, K. L. 1971. Response of calves fed ad libitum to variations in milk diet composition. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 1064–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. P. and Smith, K. L. 1972. Influence of nonfat milk diets on intake, growth, and energy utilization by young calves. J. Dairy Sci. 55: 345–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penning, P. D., Penning, Ines M. and Treacher, T. T. 1977. The effect of temperature and method of feeding on the digestibility of two milk substitutes and on the performance of lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettyjohn, T. D., Everett, J. P. and Mochrie, R. D. 1963. Responses of dairy calves to milk replacer fed at various concentrations. J. Dairy Sci. 46: 710–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1980. The Calf. 4th ed. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Gaston, Helen J., Shillam, K. W. G., Thompson, S. Y., Stobo, I. J. F. and Greatorex, J. C. 1964. The nutrition of the veal calf. The effect of anaemia and of iron and chlortetracycline supplementation on the performance of calves given large quantities of whole milk. Br. J. Nutr. 18: 467–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. H. B., Huffman, C. F. and Reineke, E. P. 1957. The basal metabolism of the newborn calf. Br. J. Nutr. 11: 373–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. H. B., Shillam, K. W. G., Thompson, S. Y. and DAWSON, DIANE A. 1961. The effect of emulsification of a milk-substitute diet by mechanical homogenization and by the addition of soya-bean lecithin on plasma lipid and vitamin A levels and on the growth rate of the newborn calf. Br. J. Nutr. 15: 541–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. H. B. and Stobo, I. J. F. 1978. Research on the composition of milk substitute diets for calves at the National Institute for Research in Dairying: an historical review. Bienn. Rev. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy., pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Stobo, I. J. F., Roy, J. H. B. and Ganderton, P. 1979. The effect of changes in concentrations of dry matter, and of fat and protein in milk substitute diets for veal calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 93: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ternouth, J. H., Ganderton, P. and Beattie, A. W. 1985. The effect of abrupt changes in the concentration and frequency of feeding milk substitute diets upon the voluntary food intake of calves. Br. J. Nutr. In press.Google Scholar
Ternouth, J. H., Stobo, I. J. F. and Roy, J. H. B. 1978. The effect of dry matter concentration on milk substitute intake by the calf. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37: 57A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
Treacher, T. T. and Penning, P. D. 1971. The development of an automatic system for rearing lambs artificially. Outlook Agric. 6: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar