Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:47:07.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of level of feeding on the response of lactating ewes to dietary supplements of fish meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. S. Gonzalez ,
J. J. Robinson  and
I. McHattie
J. S. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
I. McHattie
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-six individually-penned ewes (mean live weight 69 kg), each suckling two lambs, were given one of three diets containing either 128 (low), 155 (medium) or 186 (high) g crude protein (CP) per kg dry matter. All diets contained (g/kg), milled hay, 570; molasses, 95; and a barley/fish meal concentrate, 330. The three protein concentrations were achieved by adjusting the proportions of barley and fish meal in the concentrate. Each diet was given at daily metabolizable energy (ME) intakes of 19, 23 and 27 MJ. Mean daily yields of milk in weeks 3 to 8 of lactation for ewes given the diet with the low concentration of crude protein increased from 2·32 kg at 19 MJ ME to 2·53 kg at 27 MJ. Corresponding values for the medium concentration of CP were 2·49 and 2·67 kg and for the high concentration 2·52 and 3·09 kg (P < 0·05 for differences between ME intakes and differences between dietary protein concentrations). For milk composition, interactions between the concentration of dietary protein and level of ME intake were not statistically significant but the main treatment effects were significant, with the protein concentration in milk increasing from 49·6 g/kg for ewes given the low concentration of dietary protein to 54·1 g/kg for those given the high (P < 0·001). Corresponding values for protein concentration in milk for the lowest and highest energy intake were 51·2 and 53·4 g/kg (P < 0·05). Losses of tissue protein were variable but decreased from 26 g/day for ewes given the low-protein diet to 8 g/day for those given the high. In discussing the responses in milk yield to dietary protein and ME intake attention is drawn to the modifying influence of the energy contributed from body tissue.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. 1967. Problems in predicting the value of non-protein nitrogen as a substitute for protein in rations for farm animal ruminants. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 3: (14), 84–91.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1973. Protein-energy interrelationships in growth and lactation of cattle and sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32: 115–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J. and McDonald, I. 1982. A note on the effects of body fatness and level of food intake on the rate of fat loss in lactating ewes. Anim. Prod. 34: 355–357.Google Scholar
Cojvan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I. and Smart, R. 1980. Effects of body fatness at lambing and diet in lactation on body tissue loss, feed intake and milk yields of ewes in early lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 95: 497–514.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. and Pennie, K. 1981. Effects of protein concentration in the diet on milk yield, change in body composition and the efficiency of utilization of body tissues for milk production in ewes. Anim. Prod. 33: 111–120.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. S., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. and Fraser, C. 1982. The effect in ewes of source and level of dietary protein on milk yield, and the relationship between the intestinal supply of non- ammonia nitrogen and the production of milk protein. Anim. Prod. 34: 31–40.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. S., Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I. and Mehrez, A. Z. 1979. The use of lactating ewes in evaluating protein sources for ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38: 145A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. J., Fraser, C, Gill, J. C. and McHattie, I. 1974. The effect of dietary crude protein concentration and time of weaning on milk production and body-weight change in the ewe. Anim. Prod. 19: 331–339.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., Gonzalez, J. S. and McHattie, I. 1980. The effect of level of metabolizable energy intake on the response of lactating ewes to dietary supplements of fish meal. Anim. Prod. 30: 484 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., McHattie, I., Calderon Cortes, J. F. and Thompson, J. L. 1979. Further studies on the responses of lactating ewes to dietary protein. Anim. Prod. 29: 257–269.Google Scholar