Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:29:13.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of interval between harvests and wilting on silage for milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. J. Gordon
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Abstract

Seventy-two British Friesian cows, with a mean calving date of 21 January, were used in a 3 × 2 factorial design experiment to assess the effects of the interval between harvest and wilting on the value of grass silage for milk production. Three regrowth intervals of 5, 7 and 9 weeks were used with each material ensiled both unwilted and after wilting to a dry-matter content of approximately 450g/kg. The six silages were offered ad libitum in addition to 7·6 kg concentrates per day, from day 8 of lactation until 13 April, with a mean experimental period of 67·5 days. The mean intakes of silage dry matter were 11·2, 9·8 and 8·7 kg/day for the 5-, 7 and 9-week regrowth intervals respectively and 9·6 and 10·2kg/day for the unwilted and wilted silages respectively. Regrowth interval significantly affected milk yield with mean yields of 24·7, 24·2 and 22·5 (s.e. 047) kg/day being obtained for the 5-, 7- and 9-week intervals respectively. Wilting significantly depressed milk yield with mean yields of 24·8 and 227 (s.e. 0·39) kg/day being recorded with the unwilted and wilted materials respectively. Live weight at the end of the experiment was not significantly affected by any of the treatments but the rate of live-weight loss, calculated by linear regression over the experiment, and loss in body condition score both significantly increased with increasing regrowth interval. Wilting had no effect on live weight or body condition. Increasing the regrowth interval also significantly reduced the solids-not-fat and protein contents of the milk produced during the final week of the experiment but no other significant effects were recorded on milk composition.

Blood analysis data are presented: blood urea was the only component affected by the treatments and decreased significantly as regrowth interval increased.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , August 1980 , pp. 35 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gleeson, P. A. 1970. Feeding dairy concentrates to maximum advantage under Irish conditions. In Dairy Nutrition, pp. 85–95. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1972. Winter feeding of dairy cows. Proc. An Foras Taluntais Dairying and Pig Conf., Fermoy, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1976. Effect of concentrate level and stocking rate on performance of dairy cows calving in late winter. Anim. Prod. 22: 175–187.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1977. The effect of three concentrate input levels on the performance of dairy cows calving during midwinter. Anim. Prod. 25: 373–379.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980a, The effect of silage type on the performance of lactating cows and the response to high levels of protein in the supplement. Anim. Prod. 30: 29–37.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1980b. Feed input-milk output relationships in the spring-calving dairy cow. Proc. 14th Nutrition Conf. for Feed Manufacturers, Univ. Nottingham. In press.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and McMurray, C. H. 1979. The optimum level of protein in the supplement for dairy cows with access to grass silage. Anim. Prod. 29: 283–291.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1976. Silage for beef production. Occ. Publ. agric. Res. Inst. Nth. Ire.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R. and MacGregor, A. W. 1968. Chemical changes and losses during the ensilage of wilted grass. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 19: 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. 1979. The effects of wilting on fermentation in the silo and on the nutritive value of silage. Grass Forage Sci. 34: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1980a. The effect of level and system of concentrate allocation to January/Februar y calving cows on total lactation performance. Anim. Prod. 30: 39–51.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Gordon, F. J. 1980b. The effect of type of silage and level of concentrate supplementation offered during early lactation on total lactation performance of January/February calving cows. Anim. Prod. 30: 341–354.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. and Harris, C. E. 1971. The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. I. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar