Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:22:33.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of increasing digestible undegraded protein supply to dairy cows in late gestation on the yield and composition of milk during the subsequent lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Moorby ,
R. J. Dewhurst  and
S. Marsden
J. M. Moorby
Affiliation:
Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
R. J. Dewhurst
Affiliation:
Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
S. Marsden
Affiliation:
Dalgety Agriculture Ltd, 180 Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS12 4TH
Get access

Abstract

Effects of feeding a protein supplement to dairy cows during the dry period on performance during the following lactation were investigated in two experiments. Holstein-Friesian cows were paired towards the end of lactation, and, after drying off, one of each pair received a typical dry cow management regime of ad libitum grass silage (experiment 1), or a mix of grass silage and distillers' grains or pressed beet pulp (experiment 2). The other cows were offered restricted access to the same basal diet, together with ad libitum access to barley straw and 0·5 kg/day high protein maize gluten meal. During the following lactation, animals from both groups were treated without reference to dry period treatment, and were offered equal access to the same lactation diet. Data were analysed by analysis of variance of experiment means and by parallel curve analysis using sample means. In experiment 1, milk yields were similar (27·2 v. 27·9 (s.e.d. 2·12) kg/day for control and supplemented animals respectively) but milk protein yields, and hence concentrations, were significantly higher (P < 0·001) from supplemented animals (28·9 v. 31·8 (s.e.d. 0·58) g/kg). In experiment 2, milk yields were significantly higher (P < 0·001) from supplemented animals (mean 33·3 v. 35·4 (s.e.d. 1·66) kg/day; however, milk protein yields were also significantly increased (P < 0·001) and the change in milk protein concentration was small. No difference in dry-matter intake was recorded in a subset of animals during early lactation in experiment 2. It is hypothesized that the maternal labile body protein pool was maintained or replenished during the dry period by the provision of the protein supplement, and that this had a significant effect on subsequent lactation performance.

Keywords

dairy cowsdry periodmilk productionmilk protein
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , October 1996 , pp. 201 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report no. 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 62: 787–835.Google Scholar
Albin, R. C. and Clanton, D. C. 1966. Factors contributing to the variation in urinary creatinine and creatinine-nitrogen ratios in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 25: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. H. 1969. The establishment of a laboratory procedure for the ‘in vitro’ determination of digestibility. West of Scotland Agricultural College, research bulletin no. 42.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. H., Dixon, J. and McGowan, M. 1985. Introduction of I.C.P.A.E.S to an agricultural laboratory. The Specialist, December 1985. Thermoelectron Ltd, Warrington, UK.Google Scholar
Balcells, J., Guada, J. A., Peiro, J. M. and Parker, D. S. 1992. Simultaneous determination of allantoin and oxypurines in biological-fluids by high-performance liquid-chromatography. Journal of Chromatography — Biomedical Applications 575: 153–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D. M. and Brown, D. L. 1990. Protein reserves in lactating goats. Small Ruminant Research 3: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyea, R. L., Frost, G. R., Martz, F. A., Clark, J. L. and Forkner, L. G. 1978. Body composition of dairy cattle by potassium-40 liquid scintillation detection. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 206–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. and Morant, S. V. 1983. The effect of body condition on metabolic changes associated with intake of food by the cow. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botts, R. L., Hemken, R. W. and Bull, L. S. 1979. Protein reserves in the lactating dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 433–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H. 1971. The effect on milk yield of the cow of level of feeding before calving. Dairy Science Abstracts 33: 253–270.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Broster, V. J. 1984. Reviews of the progress of dairy science — long-term effects of nutrition on the performance of the dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Research 51: 149–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, B. P., Eisenman, J. R. and Tanaka, T. S. 1984a. Arginine infusion stimulates prolactin, growth hormone, insulin, and subsequent lactation in pregnant dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 2507–2518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, B. P., Murdock, F. R., Riley, R. E. and Hillers, J. K. 1984b. Influence of prepartum dietary crude protein on growth hormone insulin, reproduction, and lactation of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 270–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilliard, Y. and Robelin, J. 1983. Mobilization of body proteins by early lactating dairy cows measured by slaughter and D20 techniques. Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on protein metabolism and nutrition, Clermont-Ferrand (France). INRA publication, 1983, II (les Colloques de VINRA, no. 16). pp. 195–198.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Reid, G. W., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Tait, C. A. G. 1981. Effects of feeding level in late pregnancy and dietary protein concentration during early lactation on food intake, milk yield, liveweight change and nitrogen balance of cows. Journal of Dairy Research 48: 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, D. G. and Rakes, A. H. 1969. Effects of prepartum feeding level and body condition on the postpartum performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 52: 1037–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePeters, E. J. and Cant, J. P. 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of bovine milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2043–2070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhanoa, M. S. 1981. A note on an alternative form of the lactation model of Wood. Animal Production 32: 349–351.Google Scholar
European Economic Community. 1971. The feedingstuffs (sampling and analysis) regulations. EEC directive 71/250/ EEC. Official journal no. L 155,12.7.71.Google Scholar
Fronk, T. J., Shultz, L. H. and Hardie, A. R. 1980. Effect of dry period overconditioning on subsequent metabolic disorders and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 1080–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frood, M. J. and Croxton, D. 1978. The use of condition scoring in dairy cows and its relationship with milk yield and liveweight. Animal Production 27: 285–291.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988. The effect of energy reserves at calving on performance of dairy cows. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 157–170. Butterworths London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Jones, G. P. 1987. The influence of body condition at calving and dietary protein supply on voluntary food intake and performance. Animal Production 44: 347–353.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Topps, J. H. 1982. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Animal Production 35: 113–119.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Ivings, W. E., Dhanoa, M. S. and Sutton, J. D. 1992. Changes in the body components of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows over the first 29 weeks of lactation. Animal Production 55: 339–360.Google Scholar
Groot, T. H. de and Aafjes, J. H. 1960. On the constancy of creatinine excretion in the urine of the dairy cow. British Veterinary Journal 116: 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, J. B., Slotnick, M. J., Hayes, H. H., Bozak, C. K., Urban, W. E. and McGilliard, M. L. 1990. Effect of prepartum dietary energy on condition score, postpartum energy, nitrogen partitions, and lactation production responses. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 3502–3511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hook, T. E., Odde, K. G., Aguilar, A. A. and Olson, J. D. 1989. Protein effects on fetal growth, colostrum and calf immunoglobulins and lactation in dairy heifers. Journal of Animal Science 67: (suppl. 1) 539 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Jaquette, R. D., Rakes, A. H. and Croom, W. J. 1988. Effect of body condition and protein on milk fat depression in early lactation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 2123–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. P. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988. The effects of body condition at calving and dietary protein content on dry-matter intake and performance in lactating dairy cows given diets of low energy content. Animal Production 47: 321–333.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1990. Genstat 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Fisher, L. J. and Lessard, J. R. 1975. Influence of prepartum feed intake on performance of cows fed ad libitum during lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. and Somerville, S. 1973. Condition scoring of cattle. Bulletin of the East of Scotland College of Agriculture, no. 6.Google Scholar
McAllan, A. B. 1982. The fate of nucleic acids in ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41: 309–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllan, A. B. and Smith, R. H. 1973. Degradation of nucleic acid derivatives by rumen bacteria in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 29: 467–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, P. and Henderson, A. R. 1964. Determination of water-soluble carbohydrates in grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 15: 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, G. K., Grieve, D. G. and McMillan, I. 1983. Performance of first lactation dairy cows fed complete rations of several ratios of forage to concentrate. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 1668–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1992. Prediction of the energy values of compound feeding stuffs for farm animals. Summary of the recommendations of a working party sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Payne, J. M., Dew, S. M., Manston, R. and Faulks, M. 1970. The use of a metabolic profile test in dairy herds. Veterinary Record 87: 150–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, J. M., Rowlands, G. J., Manston, R., Dew, S. M. and Parker, W. H. 1974. A statistical appraisal of the results of the metabolic profile tests on 191 herds in the BVA/ADAS joint exercise in animal health and productivity. British Veterinary Journal 130: 34–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pine, A. P., Jessop, N. S. and Oldham, J. D. 1994. Maternal protein reserves and their influence on lactational performance in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 71: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, I. M., Roberts, C. J., Treacher, R. J. and Williams, L. A. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on tissue mobilization, development of fatty liver and blood chemistry of dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 7–15.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. 1990. Nonlinear estimation, pp. 159–160. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. and Wright, I. A. 1983. The use of blood metabolites in the determination of energy status in beef cows. Animal Production 37: 335–343.Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K., Grieve, D. G., McBride, B. W. and Rehman, J. D. 1992. Growth and subsequent lactation in primigravid Holstein heifers after prepartum bovine somatotropin treatment. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 463–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, J. D. 1984. Feeding and milk fat production. In Milk compositional quality and its importance in future markets (ed. Castle, M. E. and Gunn, R. G.), British Society of Animal Production, occasional publication no. 9, pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. and Morant, S. V. 1989. A review of the potential of nutrition to modify milk fat and protein. Livestock Production Science 23: 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swick, R. W. and Benevenga, N. J. 1977. Labile protein reserves and protein turnover. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. R. 1976. An assessment of the value of plasma urea nitrogen and albumin concentrations as monitors of the protein status of sheep. In The use of blood metabolites in animal production (ed. Lister, D.), British Society of Animal Production, occasional publication no. 1, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
Tessmann, N. J., Radloff, H. D., Kleinmans, J., Dhiman, T. R. and Satter, L. D. 1991. Milk production response to dietary forage: grain ratio. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 2696–2707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1982. Silage as a foodstuff. In Silage for milk production (ed. Rook, J. A. F. and Thomas, P. C.), National Institute for Research in Dairying, technical bulletin no. 2, pp. 63–101.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Martin, P. A. 1988. The influence of nutrient balance on milk yield and composition. In Nutrition and lactation of the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 97–118. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Robertson, S., Chamberlain, D. G., Livingstone, R. M., Garthwaite, P. H., Dewey, P. J. S., Smart, R. and Whyte, C. 1988. Predicting the metabolisable energy (ME) content of compounded feeds for ruminants. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 127–146. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the ‘in vitro’ digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, R. J., Reid, J. M. and Roberts, C. J. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 1–6.Google Scholar
Van Saun, R. J., Idleman, S. C. and Sniffen, C. J. 1993. Effect of undegradable protein amount fed prepartum on postpartum production in first lactation holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 236–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3568–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H. 1967. Use of detergent in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50: 50–55.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Boyne, A. W. 1981. Third report of the Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. F., Mackenzie, D. D. S., Brookes, I. M. and Lyon, G. L. 1988. Importance of body tissues as sources of nutrients for milk synthesis using 13C as a marker. British Journal of Nutrition 60: 236–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, P. D. P. 1976. Algebraic models of the lactation curves for milk, fat and protein production, with estimates of seasonal variation. Animal Production 22: 35–40.Google Scholar