Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:03:41.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of feeding level and dietary protein content on the growth, body composition and rate of protein deposition in pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Campbell ,
M. R. Taverner  and
D. M. Curic
R. G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
M. R. Taverner
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
D. M. Curic
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

1. Eight diets of similar energy content, ranging in crude protein concentration from 95 to 256 g/kg, were given at either 2·5 or 3·2 times the energy level for maintenance to entire male pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg live weight.

2. Growth rate improved with increase in feeding level and with increasing dietary crude protein up to 164 g/kg (P < 0·05). The food conversion ratio improved with each increase in dietary CP up to 186 and 164 g/kg on the lower and higher feeding treatments, respectively (P < 0·05). It was also improved with increase in level of feeding of the lower-protein diets but deteriorated with increase in level of intake of the higher-protein diets (P < 005).

3. Rate of protein deposition improved with increasing dietary crude protein up to 186 and 164 g/kg on the lower and higher feeding treatments, respectively (P < 005). The results showed that, for pigs given diets deficient in crude protein, rate of protein deposition was linearly related to protein intake (P < 0·001) but independent of energy intake. For pigs given a diet adequate in crude protein, rate of protein deposition was related to energy intake and independent of crude protein intake.

4. Body fat content at 90 kg decreased with increasing dietary crude protein up to 210 and 164 g/kg on the lower and higher feeding treatments, respectively (P < 0·05), and was increased by raising the level of intake of the higher-crude protein diets (P < 0·05). However, the influence of feeding level on body fat diminished as dietary crude protein was reduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 10th ed.Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1974. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 10: 211–218.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. and Griffiths, D. A. 1975. Effects of live weight and energy intake on nitrogen balance and total N requirement of lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 33: 399–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G. 1977. The response of early-weaned pigs to various protein levels in a high energy diet. Anim. Prod. 24: 69–75.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and King, R. H. 1982. The influence of dietary protein and level of feeding on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of entire and castrated male pigs. Anim. Prod. 35: 177–184.Google Scholar
Carr, J. R., Boorman, K. N. and Cole, D. J. A. 1977. Nitrogen retention in the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 37: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, R., Lodge, G. A. and Lewis, D. 1972. Influence of energy and protein concentration in the diet on the performance of growing pigs. 1. Response to protein intake on a high-energy diet. Anim. Prod. 14: 35–46.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 1971. Nutritional evaluation of meat and bone meal. Viet. Dep. Agric, Div. agric. Chem., divl Rep. No. 2.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. and Livingstone, R. M. 1978. Effects of progressive feed restriction on the growth and carcass composition of pigs: comparative responses of gilts and castrates. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 91: 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Carr, J. R. and Pearson, G. 1980. Some aspects of the energy and nitrogen metabolism of boars, gilts and barrows given diets containing different concentrations of protein. Anim. Prod. 31: 279–289.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J., Eddie, S. M. and Stevenson, W. G. 1980. Energy and protein nutrition of earlyweaned pigs. 1. Effects of energy intake and energy: protein on growth, efficiency and nitrogen utilization of pigs between 8-32 d. Br. J. Nutr. 43: 289–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manners, M. J. and McCrea, M. R. 1962. Protein requirement of baby pigs on low-fat diets. Br. J. Nutr. 16: 475–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manners, M. J. and McCrea, M. R. 1963. Protein requirement of baby pigs. 2. Requirement on high-fat diets and effect of replacing carbohydrate by fat. Br. J. Nutr. 17: 357–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. 1979. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 2, Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 8th ed.National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Newport, M. J. 1979. Artificial rearing of pigs. 8. Effect of dietary protein level on performance, nitrogen retention and carcass composition. Br. J. Nutr. 41: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, I. H. 1976. Nutrition of the young pig in relation to body composition. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Melb.Google Scholar