Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:09:14.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of energy intake on protein and energy metabolism of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. S. Rao  and
K. J. McCracken
D. S. Rao
Affiliation:
Food and Agricultural Chemistry Department, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
K. J. McCracken
Affiliation:
Food and Agricultural Chemistry Department, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted each using one batch of six Landrace littermate, entire male, pedigree pigs in a Latin-square change-over study of the effects of energy intake on nitrogen and energy metabolism over the range 33 to 88 kg live weight. One animal from each litter was slaughtered at 33 kg body weight to obtain initial body composition data. Five feeding levels (80, 100, 120, 140 and 160g/kg M0·63) were used during five consecutive metabolism trials each of 11-days duration, excreta being collected during the last 7 days. The pigs were housed in individual metabolism cages and the diets were offered in liquid form (approx. 300 g dry matter (DM) per kg) twice daily at 09.00 and 16.00 h. Heat production was measured for 1 day during each balance period in an open-circuit respiration chamber. The average daily gain, nitrogen retention, heat production and energy retention increased linearly (P < 0·001) with increasing metabolizable energy (ME) intake. The relationship between energy intake and protein deposition was linear up to levels above the normal ad libitum consumption of energy. Protein deposition potential of these high genetic potential pigs was at least 200 g/day, and tended to be constant between 35 and 85 kg live weight. From the combined results of experiments 1 and 2, the energy requirement for maintenance was 0·982 MJ ME per kg M0·63 per day and the decrease in protein deposition was approximately 6 g/MJ reduction in ME within the range of practical energy intakes.

Keywords

boarsenergy intakeenergy metabolismprotein metabolism
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , June 1991 , pp. 499 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Black, J. L., Campbell, R. G., Williams, I. H., James, K. J. and Davies, G. T. 1986. Simulation of energy and amino acid utilisation in the pig. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 121–145.Google Scholar
Burlacu, G., Baia, G., Ionila, D., Moisa, D., Taşcenco, V., Vişan, V. and Stoica, I. 1973. Efficiency of the utilization of the energy of food in piglets, after weaning. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81: 295–302.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983a. The effects of energy intake and dietary protein on nitrogen retention, growth performance, body composition and some aspects of energy metabolism of baby pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983b. The influence of dietary protein and energy intake on the performance, body composition and energy utilization of pigs growing from 7 to 19 kg. Animal Production 36: 185–192.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Taverner, M. R. 1988. Genotype and sex effects on the relationship between energy intake and protein deposition in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66: 676–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1985. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal Production 40: 497–503.Google Scholar
Close, W. H., Berschauer, F. and Heavens, R. P. 1983. The influence of protein: energy value of the ration and level of feed intake on the energy and nitrogen metabolism of the growing pig. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, W. H., Stanier, M. W. and Sanz Sampelayo, M. R. 1979. The energy requirements for growth in the early-weaned pig. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38: 47A.Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A., Sparkes, G. M., Lewis, D. and Yen, H. T. 1983. The lysine requirements of restricted and ad libitum fed pigs receiving an ideal protein. Proceedings of the Vth World Conference on Animal Production, Vol. 2, pp. 417–418.Google Scholar
Dirar, H. A., Harper, D. B. and Collins, M. A. 1985. Biochemical and microbiological studies on kawal, a meat substitute derived by fermentation of Cassia obtusifolia leaves. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36: 881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkin, A. C., Black, J. L. and James, K. J. 1986. Nitrogen balance in relation to energy intake in entire male pigs weighing 75 kg. British Journal of Nutrition 55: 201–207.Google Scholar
Gray, R. and McCracken, K. J. 1976. A system of centralised gas analysis and data capture to service several open and closed circuit respiration chambers. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Vermorel, M.), European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 19, pp. 335–338. de Bussac, Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Halter, H. M., Wenk, C. and Schurch, A. 1980. Effect of feeding level and feed composition on energy utilisation, physical activity and growth performance of piglets. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Vermorel, M.), European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 26, pp. 395–398. de Bussac, Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Hoffstetter, P. and Wenk, C. 1982. Influence of protein supply on energy metabolism of growing pigs. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstøl, F.), European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 29, pp. 233–236. University of Norway, Aas-NLH.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Carr, J. R. and Pearson, G. 1980. Some aspects of the energy and nitrogen metabolism of boars, gilts and barrows given diets containing different concentrations of protein. Animal Production 31: 279–289.Google Scholar
Just, A., Jorgensen, H. and Fernandez, J. 1982. Nitrogen balance studies and nitrogen retention. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig (ed. Laplace, J. P., Corring, T. and Rerat, A.), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique Publication 12, pp. 111–122.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. and Rao, D. S. 1989. Protein: energy interactions in boars of high lean deposition potential. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 43, pp. 13–16.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. and Stockdale, R. I. 1989. Voluntary feed intake of pigs of high genetic potential fed pellets to appetite: effects of sex and dietary protein content. In The Voluntary Food Intake of Pigs (ed. Forbes, J. M., Varley, M. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), British Society of Animal Production, Occasional Publication No. 13, pp. 117–118.Google Scholar
Metz, S. H. M., Bergström, P. L., Lenis, N. P., De wus, M. and Dekker, R. A. 1980. The effect of daily energy intake on growth rate and composition of weight gain in pigs. Livestock Production Science 7: 79–87.Google Scholar
Rao, D. S. and McCracken, K. J. 1990. Protein requirements of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. Animal Production 51: 179–187.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Gaus, G., Michel, A., SUSENBETH, A. and MENKE, K. H. 1982. Effect of level of feeding and body weight on partition of energy in growing pigs. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Ekern, A. and Sundstøl, F.), European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 29, pp. 225–228. Agricultural University of Norway, Aas-NLH.Google Scholar
Siebrits, F. K., Kemm, E. H., Ras, H. N. and Barnes, P. M. 1986. Protein deposition in pigs as influenced by sex, type and live mass. 1. The pattern and composition of protein deposition. South African Journal of Animal Science 16: 23–27.Google Scholar
Wang, T. C. and Fuller, M. F. 1990. The effect of the plane of nutrition on the optimum dietary amino acid pattern for growing pigs. Animal Production 50: 155–164.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1983. Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems 11: 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Fawcett, R. H. 1976. Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Animal Production 22: 87–96.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Tullis, J. B. and Emmans, G. C. 1988. Protein growth in pigs. Animal Production 46: 437–445.Google Scholar