Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:01:54.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of different dietary energy concentrations on the voluntary intake and growth of intensively-fed lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. P. Andrews ,
M. Kay  and
E. R. Ørskov
R. P. Andrews
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
M. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

In a comparative slaughter trial which covered growth from about 16 kg to 40 kg live weight, five groups of six Romney × Swaledale lambs were offered ad libitum five pelleted diets (A to E) in which rolled barley was gradually replaced by an 80 : 20 mixture of rolled oats : oat husks to the extent that the calculated metabolizable energy (ME) concentration fell from approximately 2–9 (A) to 2·5 (E) Mcal/kg DM.

Although daily live-weight gains did not differ significantly between treatments, the daily carcass gain fell from 143 g/day on A to 105 g/day on E (P<0·05) whereas gut contents increased from 9·9% of live weight to 16·1% (P< 0·001) from A to E. Differences in efficiency of utilization of ME above maintenance were variable but for gross efficiency (i.e. retention/total ME intake), there was a significant decline from A to E.

Dry-matter intakes for the whole experimental period were similar for all five diets, but initially intake was lower for diet E than for A (780 v. 927 g/day) and ultimately it was higher for E (1410 v. 1150 g/day). In a second experiment, involving diets A and E and a third diet of chopped dried grass, the pattern of intake and growth changed with live weight in a similar manner to that described above, except that appetite and growth on dried grass were consistently poorer. Daily variation in intake and rumen pH tended to be greater on the concentrate diets.

It is suggested that, amongst other factors, the stage of maturity of an animal may influence the point at which the digestible energy content of the diet restricts dietary intake in preference to physical limitations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 1969 , pp. 173 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Clapperton, J. L. 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 19: 511–522.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. and Martin, A. K. 1966. The heat of combustion of the urine of sheep and cattle in relation to its chemical composition and to diet. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 449–460.Google Scholar
Brent, B. E., Richardson, D., Tsien, W. S. and Menzies, C. S. 1961. Digestibility studies on levels of concentrates in complete pelleted rations for fattening lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 526–528.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. A. and O'Carroll, F. M. 1964. Differences between left and right sides of lamb carcasses. Ir. J. agric. Res. 3: 223–237.Google Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Pratt, A. D. and Hibbs, J. W. 1964. Regulation of feed intake in dairy cows. I. Change in importance of physical and physiological factors with increasing digestibility. J. Dairy Sci. 47: 54–62.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. L. 1966. The balance trial and its limitations. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, (ed. Abrams, J. T.) pp. 51–80. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Meyer, J. H. and Loforeen, G. P. 1959. The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 528–547.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1966. Feeding indoor sheep. Agriculture, Lond. 73: 113–117.Google Scholar
Martin, A. K. 1966. Some errors in the determination of nitrogen retention of sheep by nitrogen balance studies. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 325–337.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965a. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. I. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 569–574.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965b. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. II. Rations varying in energy concentration and physical form. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 1623–1628.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Cunningham, H. M. and Friend, D. W. 1963. Effect of adding buffers to all-concentrate rations on feedlot performance of steers, ration digestibility and intra-rumen environment. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R., Miller, E. L. and Ridgman, W. J. 1967. The intensive rearing of lambs. 2. Voluntary food intake and performance on diets of varying oat husk and beef tallow content. Anim. Prod. 9: 509–520.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. and Ridgman, W. J. 1967. The effect of dietary energy content on the voluntary intake of pigs. Anim. Prod. 9: 107–113.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. and Ridgman, W. J. 1968. Further studies of the effect of dietary energy content on the voluntary intake of pigs. Anim. Prod. 10: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packett, L. V. and McCune, R. W. 1965. Determination of steam-volatile organic acids on fermentation media by gas-liquid chromatography. Appl. Microbiol. 13: 22–27.Google Scholar
Reid, R. L., Hogan, J. P. and Briggs, P. K. 1957. The effect of diet on individual volatile fatty acids in the rumen of sheep, with particular reference to the effect of low rumen pH and adaptation to high starch diets. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 691–710.Google Scholar
Simkins, K. L. 1965. Relationship of blood and rumen metabolites to food intake in ruminants. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. 1964. Energy retention in lambs as measured by the comparative slaughter technique. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.) Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. and Hepburn, W. R. 1955. The analysis of roughages by the normal-acid fibre method and its use for predicting the digestibility of roughages by sheep. Agric.Progr. 30: 118–119.Google Scholar
Woods, W. and Rhodes, R. W. 1962. Effect of varying roughage to concentrate ratios on the utilisation by lambs of rations differing in physical form. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 479–482.Google Scholar