Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:05:38.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of dietary fat and metabolizable energy supply on milk protein concentration of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Moorby ,
R. J. Dewhurst ,
C. Thomas  and
S. Marsden
J. M. Moorby
Affiliation:
Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
R. J. Dewhurst
Affiliation:
Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
Grassland and Ruminant Science Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
S. Marsden
Affiliation:
Dalgety Agriculture Ltd, 180 Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS12 4TH
Get access

Abstract

To investigate the effect of dietary fat and metabolizable energy (ME) on milk protein concentration, an experiment was carried out using 12 multiparous early-lactation Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Three diets were offered in a complete Latin-square change-over design, based on ad libitum access to grass silage. One of three concentrates was offered at a rate of 12 kg/day, each formulated to supply one of two levels of ME (12·1 and 13·6 MJ/kg dry matter (DM)) and one of two levels of fat (31 and a mean of 88 g acid hydrolysis ether extract per kg DM): low energy, high fat (LEHF); low energy, low fat (LELF); and high energy, high fat (HEHF). The concentration of milk protein was significantly higher from animals offered the LELF concentrate (32·5 v. a mean of 31·2 (s.e.d. 0·45) g/kg, P < 0·05), because of lower milk yields (31·0 v. a mean of 33·4 (s.e.d. 0·63) kg/day, P < 0·05). Animals offered the HEHF concentrate produced the highest yields of milk protein but their milk had the lowest concentrations of fat (32·5,34·4 and 31·9 g/kg for LEHF, LELF and HEHF respectively; s.e.d 1·07; P < 0·05 for difference between LELF and HEHF). Silage DM intake was significantly increased by animals offered the LEHF concentrate (9·1, 8·6 and 8·7 (s.e.d. 0·19) kg/day, P < 0·05 for differences between LEHF and the other two concentrates). Urinary purine derivative excretion, used as an index ofmicrobial protein supply, was highest from animals offered the LELF and HEHF concentrates, which both supplied similar amounts of fermentable ME. It is hypothesized that increased de novo synthesis offatty acids on the low fat diet reduced the availability of glucose for lactose synthesis, leading to reduced milk yields and hence increased milk protein concentrations.

Keywords

dairy cowsdietary fatmetabolizable energymilk productionmilk protein
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1998 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report no. 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 62: 788–835.Google Scholar
Baer, R. J. 1991. Alteration of the fatty acid content of milk fat. Journal of Food Protection 54: 383–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banks, W., Clapperton, J. L. and Kelly, M. E. 1980. Effect of oil-enriched diets on the milk yield and composition, and on the composition and physical properties of the milk fat of dairy cows receiving a basal ration of grass silage. Journal of Dairy Research 47: 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, J. P., DePeters, E. J. and Baldwin, R. L. 1993. Mammary uptake of energy metabolites in dairy cows fedfat and its relationship to milk protein depression. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 2254–2265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, D. P. and Schingoethe, D. J. 1989. Model to describe and alleviate milk protein depression in early lactation dairy cows fed a high fat diet. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 3327–3335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppock, C. E. and Wilks, D. L. 1991. Supplemental fat in high-energy rations for lactating cows: effects on intake, digestion, milk yield, and composition. Journal of Animal Science 69: 3826–3837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePeters, E. J. and Cant, J. P. 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of bovine milk — a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2043–2070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePeters, E. J., Taylor, S. J. and Baldwin, R. L. 1989. Effect of dietary fat in isocaloric rations on the nitrogen content of milk from Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2949–2957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePeters, E. J., Taylor, S. J., Finley, C. M. and Famula, T. R. 1987. Dietary fat and nitrogen composition of milk from lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 1192–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewhurst, R. J., Mitton, A. M., Offer, N. W. and Thomas, C. 1996. Effects of the composition of grass silages on milk production and nitrogen utilization by dairy cows. Animal Science 62: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drackley, J. K. and Elliot, J. P. 1993. Milk composition, ruminal characteristics, and nutrient utilization in dairy cows fed partially hydrogenated tallow. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 183–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faulkner, A. and Pollock, H. T. 1989. Changes in the concentration of metabolites in milk from cows fed on diets supplemented with soybean oil or fatty acids. Journal of Dairy Research 56: 179–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsberg, N. E., Baldwin, R. L. and Smith, N. E. 1985. Roles of glucose and its interaction with acetate in maintenance and biosynthesis in bovine mammary tissue. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2544–2549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holter, J. B., Hayes, H. H., Kierstead, N. and Whitehouse, J. 1993. Protein-fat bypass supplement for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 1342–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, T. C. and Jenny, B. F. 1992. Nutrient digestion and lactation performance of dairy cows fed combinations of prilled fat and canola oil. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 796–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1990. Genstat 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lees, J. A., Oldham, J. D., Haresign, W. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1990. The effect of patterns of rumen fermentation on the response by dairy cows to dietary protein concentration. British Journal of Nutrition 63: 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moorby, J. M., Dewhurst, R. J., Thomas, C. and Marsden, S. 1996. The influence of dietary energy source and dietary protein level on milk protein concentration from dairy cows. Animal Science 63: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, D. L., Weisbjerg, M. R. and Hvelplund, T. 1993. Ruminal, intestinal and total digestibilities of nutrients in cows fed diets high in fat and undegradable protein. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penning, P. D. and Johnson, R. H. 1983. The use of internal markers to estimate herbage digestibility and intake. 2. Indigestible acid detergent fibre. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100: 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. 1987. Factors affecting substitution rates in dairy cows on silage based rations. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1987 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 205–218. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar