Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:47:03.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of dietary energy content on the voluntary intake of pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access

Extract

1. An experiment to investigate the effect of dietary energy concentration on the voluntary intake and growth of pigs from 27·2 to 118·0 kg. (60 to 260 lb.) live-weight is described and the results discussed.

2. From 27·2 to 50·0 kg. live-weight energy intake was substantially restricted and growth retarded by diets of low energy concentration but from 50·0 to 118·0 kg. there was little difference between diets in either energy intake or growth because daily food intake of the low energy diets was increased.

3. Effects of diet on carcass quality as measured by full dissection were small except that killing-out percentage was lower on one of the low energy diets.

4. It is concluded that limited differences in the energy concentration and palatability of ingredients are unimportant in formulating pelleted diets for self-fed pigs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beacom, S. E., 1964. The influence of sex on the response of self-fed pigs to ration dilution during the finishing period. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 281289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, V. R., Kidwell, J. F., & McCormick, J. A., 1953. High levels of alfalfa in the rations of growing-fattening swine. J. Anim. Sci., 12: 876880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W., Ashton, G. C., & Lloyd, L. E., 1954. Improvement of bacon carcass quality by the introduction of fibrous feeds into the hog finishing ration. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 327331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnocki, J., Sibbald, I. R., & Evans, E. V., 1961. The determination of chromic oxide in samples of feed and excreta by acid digestion and spectrophotometry. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 41: 167179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S., 1950. Die Bedeutung des Ballastes als Nahrungsfaktor dargestellt anhand von Untersuchungen am Wachsenden Schwein. Promotionsarbeit der Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule, Zürich. Pp. 151.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J., & Baumgardt, B. R., 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 1. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J Dairy Sci., 48: 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R., & Rtdgman, W. J., 1965. The voluntary food intake and performance of intensively reared lambs given pelleted diets of varying digestibility. Anim. Prod., 7: 289 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Troelsen, J. E., & Bell, J. M., 1963. A comparison of nutritional effects in swine and mice. Responses in feed intake, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics to similar diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 43: 294302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, F., & Bezeau, L. M., 1957. The metabolic faecal nitrogen excretion of the pig as influenced by the type of fibre in the ration and by body weight. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 37: 106113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar