Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:46:19.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of concentration of milk substitute on the performance of artificially reared lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. V. Large
R. V. Large
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
Get access

Summary

1. Six Dorset Horn lambs were reared on each of four different concentrations of reconstituted full-cream dried milk powder (10, 15, 20 and 25 % dry matter). The lambs were fed to appetite four times a day for 3 weeks.

2. The lambs consumed significantly more liquid milk at the two lower concentrations. Intake of water per se increased with increasing concentration of dry matter.

3. There were no significant differences in the consumption of milk dry matter between the treatments, although there was a significant linear trend, with dry-matter intake decreasing with decreasing concentration.

4. There were no significant differences between the treatments in live-weight gain from 0 to 3 weeks or from 0 to 10 weeks.

5. There were no significant differences in the efficiency of feed conversion between the treatments.

6. Examination of the distribution of milk intake within days showed that the proportion of milk voluntarily consumed in the first feed of the day increased with age and with concentration.

7. The incidence of scouring was high, but there was no general relationship with treatment.

8. Abrupt weaning was not satisfactory for the lambs which had been offered only liquid food for 3 weeks and they had to receive a low level of milk feeding for a further week while they became accustomed to solid food.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , October 1965 , pp. 325 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnicoat, C. R., Murray, P. F., Roberts, E. M., & Wilson, G. F., 1956. Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. J. agric. Sci., 48: 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsma, F. N., 1939. Factors influencing the growth and development of lambs with special reference to cross breeding of Merino sheep for fat lamb production. Univ.Pretoria Publ. Ser. I: Agric., no. 48.Google Scholar
Burt, A. W. A., & Bell, E. O., 1962. Effect of level and concentration of liquid milk substitutes fed to early weaned calves. J. agric. Sci., 58: 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. M. M., Edwards, R. A., & Simpson, M. E., 1961. Rearing lambs on a synthetic diet. Anim. Prod., 3: 105–109.Google Scholar
Davey, A. W. F., 1964. Effects of dilution of reconstituted buttermilk on intake, growth and health of Jersey calves. N.Z. J. agric. Res., 5: 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassland Research Institute, 1962–63. Experiments in Progress, 16: 76–79.Google Scholar
Large, R. V., 1962. The artificial rearing of lambs. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Reading.Google Scholar
Large, R. V., 1965. The artificial rearing of lambs. J. agric. Sci. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, F. B., 1901. Breeding experiments with sheep. II. Milk and food records of ewes. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 53.Google Scholar
Munro, J., 1955. Studies on the milk yields of Scottish Blackface ewes. J. agric. Sci., 46: 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B., 1957. A study of the lactation and growth of hill sheep in their natural environment and under lowland conditions. J. agric. Sci., 48: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrtn, D., 1958. The chemical composition of the colostrum and milk of the ewe. J. Dairy Res., 25: 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettyjohn, J. D., Everitt, J. P., & Mochrie, R. D., 1961. The effect of dietary dilution on nutrient intake by dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 44: 1183.Google Scholar
Pettyjohn, J. D., Everitt, J. P., & Mochrie, R. D., 1963. Responses of dairy calves to milk replacers fed at various concentrations. J. Dairy Sci., 46: 710–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., 1957. Milk substitute and early weaning of calves. Agriculture, Land., 64: 429–433.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., 1958. The orphan. Fmrs Weekly, 15th Aug.: p. 27.Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W., & Large, R. V., 1959. Sideways creep-grazing for intensive lamb production. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc., 14: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar