Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:07:34.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of ammonia treatment on the intake of straw and hay when offered with rations of concentrates to ewes in late pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. J. Orr ,
T. T. Treacher  and
V. C. Mason
R. J. Orr
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
T. T. Treacher
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
V. C. Mason
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Finnish Landrace × Dorset Horn ewes were offered 300, 600 or 900 g fresh weight per day of concentrates and forage ad libitum from day 105 of pregnancy until lambing. Spring barley straw (S) or hay (H) was offered either untreated (U) or following treatment with anhydrous ammonia in an oven (T). Organic matter digestibilities (in vitro) were 0·42, 0·58, 0·42 and 0·60 and nitrogen contents were 7·2, 18·6, 12·0 and 25·0 g/kg dry matter for US, TS, UH and TH respectively. Forage intake did not differ between ewes carrying two or more foetuses but the small number of ewes carrying one foetus ate more straw (6·8 v. 4·5 g organic matter (OM) per kg live weight) than ewes carrying two or more foetuses. Ammonia treatment increased intake; the increase was larger on straw (4·6 v. 100 g OM per kg live weight) than on hay (9·0 v. 10·7 g OM per kg live weight). Replacement rates of forage by concentrates were -0·21, +0·06, -0·48 and +0·08 kg forage per kg concentrates for treatments US, TS, UH and TH respectively; only the value for treatment UH differed significantly from zero. On most treatments forage intake decreased as pregnancy progressed and the declines were greater when treated forages were offered. Concentrate level had a large effect on most aspects of ewe performance. Ewes offered treated forage gained slightly more weight in pregnancy (138 v. 104 g/day), had a slightly smaller decrease in body condition score (-0·54 v. -0·68) between day 105 and lambing but did not have greater lamb birth weights than ewes on untreated forage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 101 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abidin, Z. and Kempton, T. J. 1981. Effects of reatment of barley straw with anhydrous ammonia and supplementation with heat-treated protein meals on feed intake and liveweight performance of growing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 6: 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Arnason, J. and Mo, M. 1977. Ammonia treatment of straw. In Rep. 3rd Straw Utilization Conf., Oxford (ed. Staniforth, A. R.), pp. 25–31. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pinner.Google Scholar
Berger, L., Klopfenstein, T. and Britton, R. 1979. Effect of sodium hydroxide on efficiency of rumen digestion. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 1317–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borhami, B. E. A. and Johnsen, F. 1981. Digestion and duodena! flow of ammonia-treated straw, and sodium hydroxide-treated straw supplemented with urea, soybean meal or fish viscera silage. Ada Agric. scand. 31: 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buettner, M. R., Lechtenberg, V. L., Hendrix, K. S. and Hertel, J. M. 1982. Composition and digestion of ammoniated tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) hay. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschard, G. 1983. Alkali treatment of whole-crop cereal silage. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. H. and Chesson, A. 1983. The effect of prolonged storage on the digestibility and nitrogen content of ammonia-treated barley straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 8: 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, M. N. M. and Pearce, G. R. 1983. Effects of chemical pretreatments on the composition and in vitro digestibility of crop by-products. Agric. Wastes 5: 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayasuriya, M. C. N. and OWEN, EMYR. 1975. Sodium hydroxide treatment of barley straw; effect of volume and concentration of solution on digestibility and intake by sheep. Anim. Prod. 21: 313–322.Google Scholar
Lamb, C. S. and Eadie, J. 1979. The effect of barley supplements on the voluntary intake and digestion of low quality roughages by sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, M. J. and O'SHEA, J. 1979. The effect of ammoniation on the intake and nutritive value of straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 4: 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C. 1981. Upgrading of low quality forages by J chemical treatment. In Hay and Silage Additives. An Up-to-date Evaluation (eds. Low, A. J. and R. D. i Sheldrick), pp. 4.1-4.10. Br. Grassld Soc. and Soc. Chem. Industr., Agric. Group.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1981. Feeding the Ewe. Sheep Improvement Services, Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Orr, R. J., Newton, J. E. and Jackson, Caroline A. 1983. The intake and performance of ewes offered concentrates and grass silage in late pregnancy. Anim Prod. 36: 21–27.Google Scholar
Orr, R. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1984. The effect of concentrate level on the intake of hays by ewes in late pregnancy. Anim. Prod. 39: 89–98.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1980. Energy requirements of ewes during late pregnancy and early lactation. Vet. Rec. 106: 282–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72: 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Maxwell, T. J., Sibbald, A. R. and McDonald, D. 1977. Relationships between energy J intake, nutritional state and lamb birth weight in j Greyface ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89: 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SundstØl, F., Coxworth, E. and Mowat, D. N. 1978.mproving the nutritive value of straw and other low- quality roughages by treatment with ammonia. Wld Anim. Rev. 26: 13–21.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadiveloo, J. and Holmes, W. 1979. The effects of forage digestibility and concentrate supplementation on the nutritive value of the diet and performance of finishing cattle. Anim. Prod. 29: 121–129.Google Scholar
Williamson, D. H. and Mellanby, J. 1974. D-(-)-3- Hydroxybutyrate. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, IV (ed. H. U. Bergmeyer), pp. 1836–1839. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar