Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:38:17.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of a fully-controlled out-of-parlour concentrate dispenser on the production of British Friesian dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. Rees  and
P. Rowlinson
P. Rees
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
P. Rowlinson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Get access

Abstract

In two experiments the effect of giving concentrates to dairy cows from a fully-controlled out-of-parlour dispenser was compared with giving concentrates twice daily in the milking parlour. In experiment 1, 22 cows were used in a cross-over design during the first 19 weeks of lactation. In experiment 2, 34 cows were used in a continuous trial during the first 18 weeks of lactation. Weeks 1 to 3 of each experiment were used as a standardization period during which all cows were given equal amounts of concentrates twice a day during milking. At the end of this period cows were paired and assigned to receive concentrates either in the milking parlour (group P) or to receive 1·0 kg concentrates per day in the milking parlour and the remainder from an out-of-parlour dispenser (group O). Within pairs, between treatments, cows were offered the same amount of concentrates and allowed access to ad libitum silage. Means for milk yield, fat and solids-not-fat concentrations during experiment 1 were 25·1 v. 23·9 kg/day (P < 0·01), 36·5 v. 38·1 g/kg, 89·9 v. 89·1 g/kg (P < 0·001), and for experiment 2 were 27·1 v. 25·4 kg/day (P < 0·01), 39·8 v. 42·6 g/kg, and 90·9 v. 90·9 g/kg, for groups O and P respectively. Mean concentrate intakes during experiment 1 were 8·3 v. 8·4 kg/day (P < 0·01) and during experiment 2 were 8·9 v. 8·6 kg/day (P < 0·01) for groups O and P respectively. In both experiments, group O had more positive changes in weight and body condition score (P < 0·05). It is concluded that the use of the dispenser improved milk yield, weight and condition-score changes, though milk fat concentration was decreased compared to that of parlour-fed cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 43 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Amies, S. J. 1984. Changes in the producer payments scheme. In Milk Compositional Quality and its Importance in Future Markets (ed. Castle, M. E. and Gunn, R. G.), pp. 1–6. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 9.Google Scholar
Balch, D. A. and Rowland, S. J. 1957. Volatile fatty acids and lactic acid in the rumen of dairy cows receiving a variety of diets. Br. J. Nutr. 11: 288–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J. R. and Merilan, C. P. 1961. Effects of frequency of feeding on production characteristics and feed utilization in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 664–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, E. K., Merrill, W. G., Milligan, R. A. and Guest, R. W. 1984. Evaluation of systems for feeding supplemental concentrate to cows in groups. J. Dairy Sci. 67: 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J. R. 1980. Equipment for feeding concentrates in and out of the parlour. In The Mechanization and Automation of Cattle Production (ed. Dodd, F. H.), pp. 155–169. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 2.Google Scholar
Frobish, R. A., Harshbarger, K. E. and Olver, E. F. 1978. Automatic individual feeding of concentrates to dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 61: 1789–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1984. The effects of frequency of feeding on milk production of dairy cattle: an analysis of published results. Anim. Prod. 38: 181–189.Google Scholar
Gill, M. S. and Castle, M. E. 1983. The effects of the frequency of feeding concentrates on milk production and eating behaviour in Ayrshire dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 36: 79–85.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. and Wolstrup, J. 1977. Effect of feeding frequency on fermentation patterns and microbial activity in the bovine rumen. Ada. vet. scand. 18: 108–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, W. 1973. [Effect of higher frequencies of feeding on rumen fermentation and milk production of dairy cows.] Kieler milchw. ForschBer. 25: 245–250.Google Scholar
Lindner, H. P., Kirchgessner, M. and Schwarz, F. J. 1979. [Feed intake and milk production of dairy cows under different feeding frequencies of basal ration and concentrates.] Zuchtungskunde 51: 215–226.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Ref. Book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mulvany, P. 1977. Dairy cow condition scoring. National Institute for Research in Dairying, Paper No. 4468.Google Scholar
Pant, H. C. and Roy, A. 1971. Effect of frequency of feeding on the rumen microbial activity. Ruminal pH, total volatile fatty acid concentration and molar proportions of individual fatty acids. Indian. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 232–237.Google Scholar
Rees, P. 1983. An evaluation of a fully controlled out- of-parlour concentrate dispenser for dairy cows. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1962. Changes in digestive physiology of the bovine associated with various feeding frequencies. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 897–900.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Kelly, Morag E. 1976. The effect of frequency of feeding on milk secretion in the Ayrshire cow. J. Dairy Res. 43: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed