Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:17:16.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic evaluation of selecting sheep for wool production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. P. Thatcher
Affiliation:
Victorian Department of Agriculture, 3 TreaSury Place, Melbourne, Australia 3001
K. M. Napier
Affiliation:
S. S. Cameron Laboratory (Animal Research), State Research Farm, Werribee, Australia 3030
Get access

Summary

A technique is described for assessing the profitability of selecting sheep for wool production. A model of the breeding system incorporating three submodels is developed: one to represent the flock from which the selection intensities for rams andewes are calculated; a second to determine gains made in wool production and the year in which they accrue; and the third uses discounting procedures to examine the economics of selecting for wool production.

Flock and genetic parameters were set at ‘average’ values for an Australian Merino wool producer and gains were determined for a range of lambing percentages. Three measures were used to evaluate profitability; the net present value of the programme which shows overall profits, the internal rate of return, which gives the earning rate of the programme, and the payback period, which identifies the number of years before early costs are repaid.

sensitivity analysis was used to examine changes in the three measures of profitability resulting from changes in interest rate, wool price, costs for labour and computer analysis, wool testing costs and lambing percentage. Profitability was sensitive to changes in all parameters except wool testing charges, and of the remainder the producer has a degree of control only over labour costs. A programme can be profitable, however, if wool price and lambing percentage are adequate and costs can be kept at reasonably low levels. Simple breeding programmes should be studied in which labour inputs are kept to a minimum or where costs are confined to studs (nuclei) and genetic gain disseminated by the sale (migration) of rams.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, W. A. 1967. ManualofProcedures in Quantitative Genetics. 2nd ed. Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Chisholm, A. H. and Dillon, J. L. 1966. Discounting and Other Interest Rate Procedures on Farm Management. Farm Management Guide Book No. 2. University of New England.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1971. Investment appraisal of national breeding programmes. Anim. Prod. 13: 3750.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1974. Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations. Anim. Prod. 18: 117139.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1970a. The selection of dairy bulls for artificial insemination. Anim. Prod. 12: 569576.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1970b. Performance test procedures for meat production amongst dairy bulls used in AI. Anim. Prod. 12: 577583.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1971. The genetic and financial consequences of selection amongst dairy bulls in artificial insemination. Anim. Prod. 13: 209218.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1971. Cost Benefit Analysis. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Price Gittinger, J. 1972. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Soixer, M., Bar-Anan, R. and Pasternak, H. 1966. Selection of dairy cattle for growth rate and milk production. Anim. Prod. 8: 109119.Google Scholar
Turner, H. N., Brown, G. H. and Ford, G. H. 1968. The influence of age structure on total productivity in breeding flocks of Merino sheep. I. Flocks with a fixed number of breeding ewes, producing their own replacements. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 443475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. N. and Young, S. S. Y. 1969. Quantitative Genetics in Sheep Breeding. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar