Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:07:19.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dried sugar-beet pulp as a roughage substitute for pregnant ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. A. Dickson  and
R. Laird
I. A. Dickson
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
R. Laird
Affiliation:
The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
Get access

Summary

In 1968-69 for a mean period of 101 days before lambing, 72 cross-bred ewes, and in 1969-70 for a mean period of 88 days, 107 ewes were given roughage daily in the form of (a) 0·91 kg field-cured hay (b) 0·45 kg of hay plus 0·23 kg dried sugar-beet pulp nuts, or (c) 0·45 kg of pulp nuts. Each diet was supplemented by a concentrate allowance. From the 6th week before lambing was due to start, this allowance was progressively and uniformly increased.

There was no evidence that the dried sugar-beet pulp had adversely affected performance in terms of ewe body-weight change, lamb numbers, litter weight at birth or 4 weeks of age, fleece weight or general health. It is therefore concluded that dried sugar-beet pulp can be used safely as a replacement for hay in supplying up to 67% of the energy needed for maintenance by ewes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 115 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. H. 1969. The establishment of a laboratory procedure for the in vitrodetermination of digestibility. W. Scotland Agric. Coll. Res. Bull. No. 42.Google Scholar
Evans, R. E. 1960. Rations for livestock. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd, London, No. 48, 15th ed.Google Scholar
Foot, Janet Z., Russel, A. J. F., Maxwell, T. J. and Morris, P. 1973. Variation in intake among group-fed pregnant Scottish Blackface ewes given restricted amounts of food. Anim. Prod. 17: 169–177.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H. and Forbes, T. J. 1973. The effect of level and pattern of energy intake during late pregnancy on the performance of housed Scottish Blackface ewes. Anim. Prod. 16: 165–171.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Tables of Feed Composition and Energy Allowances for Ruminants. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Fraser, J., Ritchie, N. S. and Hemingway, R. G. 1974. Urea as a protein source for ewes with twin lambs in late pregnancy and early lactation. Anim. Prod. 19: 321–329.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., Fraser, C. and Bennett, C. 1971. An assessment of the energy requirements of the pregnant ewe using plasma free fatty acid concentrations. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77: 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Reid, R. L. 1967. The use of biochemical parameters in controlling nutritional state in pregnant ewes, and the effect of undernourishment during pregnancy on lamb birth-weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. G. and Smith, A. M. 1971. Effect of beet pulp and citrus pulp on rumination activity. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed