Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:05:49.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. H. McClelland  and
A. J. F. Russel
T. H. McClelland
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, 29 Lauder Road, Edinburgh EH9 2JQ
Get access

Summary

Seven Scottish Blackface and seven Finnish Landrace wether lambs were slaughtered over the weight range 26 to 41 kg. Total chemical fat deposition in relation to fleece-free empty body weight was found to be similar for both breeds, pooled data giving the significant relationship y = 1·28+0·46x, where y was the percentage chemical fat in the fleece-free empty body and x the fleece-free empty body weight.

Statistically significant differences in the rate of chemical fat deposition in different depots were found between breeds. The Scottish Blackface was found to deposit relatively more fat in muscular plus associated fatty tissue than the Finnish Landrace while the reverse situation occurred in respect of fat deposition in omental plus mesenteric fatty tissues and perirenal fatty tissues.

No breed differences were found in the rate of deposition of subcutaneous fat or fat in bone or in the remainder (head, skin and viscera).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , December 1972 , pp. 301 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahemedov, N. M. 1968. [Comparative morphology of the skeletal musculature and fat deposits of the Asiatic mouflon {Ovis orientalis Gmelin 1774) and Blabas sheep.] Izv. Akad. Nauk. azerb. SSR Ser. Nauk. 1968 (2): 59–66.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. 1948. Comparative studies of meat. II. The changes in the carcass during growth and fattening and their relation to the chemical composition of the fatty and muscular tissues. J. agric. ScL, Camb. 38: 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P., Read, J. L. and Russell, W. S. 1970. Influence of litter size and breed of sire on carcass weight and quality of lambs. Anim. Prod. 12: 281–290.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lawes and Gilbert. 1859. Experimental enquiry into the composition of some of the animals fed and slaughtered as human food. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. II: 149–507.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1968. Components of weight loss in pregnant hill ewes during winter. Anim. Prod. 10: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1971. The distribution of chemical fat in the bodies of Scottish Blackface ewes. Anim. Prod. 13: 503–509.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1966. Composition of dressed carcasses of lambs. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 191–197.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. and Aitken, F. C. 1959. Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. Part II. Sheep. World survey of reproduction and review of feeding experiments. Tech. Commun. Bur. Anim. Nutr., 20.Google Scholar
White, A., Handler, P. and Smith, E. L. 1964. Principles of Biochemistry. McGraw- Hill, London.Google Scholar
Zubairov, M. M. 1966. [The ability of sheep of various breeds to deposit fat.] Ovtsevodstvo 12: (11) 18–19.Google Scholar