Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:57:11.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digestion of unmolassed sugar-beet pulp in young growing pigs and implications for the growth-supporting values of fermented energy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Q. Zhu
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
V. R. Fowler
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
M. F. Fuller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Experiments involving both digestion and growth trials were undertaken to compare the responses of pigs to two increments of digested energy resulting either from gut fermentation or from digestion by endogenous enzymes in the small intestine. Unmolassed sugar-beet pulp (SBP) and maize starch (MS) were selected as model materials for these two systems. A control diet was formulated to fulfil the needs of pigs for all essential nutrients apart from energy. This diet was offered according to a scale set at about twice the maintenance energy requirement. The two SBP diets contained 150 and 300 g SBP per kg (SBP15 and SBP30) and the two MS diets 100 and 200 g MS per kg (MS10 and MS20). Sixty observations were made with 10 female and 20 male growing pigs to provide information on digestion. The results showed that the energy in SBP and MS had an apparent digestibility of 0·74 and 0·98 respectively (s.e.d. 0025). The neutral-detergent fibre fraction of SBP had a digestibility of 0·81 (s.e. 0·055). Forty pigs (20 male and 20 female) were involved in the growth trial. The responses of pigs to increments of different digestible energy (DE) were measured in terms of daily carcass-weight gain. The results gave values of 435, 478, 527, 511 and 567 (s.e.d. 17·3) g/day for the control, SBP15, SBP30, MS 10 and MS20 treatments respectively. These results suggest that the apparent DE of SBP is used for carcass growth with an efficiency of 0·57 (s.e. 0·012) relative to the DE from MS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The Energy Metabolism of the Ruminant. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Calvert, C. C., Steele, N. C. and Rosebrough, R. W. 1985. Digestibility of fiber components and reproductive performance of sows fed high levels of alfalfa meal. Journal of Animal Science 47: 196204.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. 1971. Detergent method for total lignin in herbage. Field Station Records, Division of Plant Industry, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia 10: 2934.Google Scholar
Cunningham, H. M., Friend, D. W. and Nicholson, J. W. G. 1962. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 42: 167175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A. W. 1970. The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculations by computer. Analyst, London 95: 181193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englyst, H. N. and Cummings, J. H. 1984. Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as aditol acetates. Analyst, London 109: 937942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, H., Hesselman, K. and Aman, P. 1985. The effect of wheat bran, whole crop peas, and beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cerealbased pig feed. Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Digestive Physiology in the Pig, Copenhagen (ed. Just, A., JOrgensen, H. and Fernandez, A.), pp. 195198.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. 1966. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Just, A., Jorgensen, H. and Fernandez, J. A. 1983. Maintenance requirement and the net energy value of different diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 10: 487506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, M. L., Van soest, P. J., Pond, W. G., Lewis, B. and McDowell, R. E. 1980. Utilization of dietary fiber from alfalfa by growing swine. 1. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 50: 175191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, J. E. and Debarthe, J. V. 1974. Site and extent of carbohydrate, dry matter, energy and protein digestion and the rate of passage of grain diets in swine. Journal of Animal Science 39: 5762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1984. GENSTAT V, Mark 4.04B. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. 1985. Alternative feeds are good for sows. In Science, Pigs and Profits (ed. Hardcastle, J.), pp. 89. Agricultural and Food Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Longland, A. C., Low, A. G., Keal, H. D. and Harland, J. I. 1988. The digestibility of growing-pig diets containing molassed or plain sugar beet pulp. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 47: 103A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Low, A. G., Partridge, I. G. and Taylor, J. A. 1988. Effects of different types of supplementary nonstarch polysaccharides on nitrogen and energy digestibility (ileal and overall) and retention in pigs. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, September 1987, Rostock, pp. 9899.Google Scholar
Mason, V. C. and Palmer, R. 1973. The influence of bacterial activity in the alimentary canal of rats on faecal nitrogen excretion. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 23: 141150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. A. and Whittemore, C. T. 1988. Dietary fibre and nitrogen excretion and retention by pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 185189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, H. L. and Kirchgessner, M. 1986. Some aspects of energy utilization in pigs. Pig News and Information 7: 419424.Google Scholar
Partridge, I. G., Keal, H. D. and Mitchell, K. G. 1982. The utilization of dietary cellulose by growing pigs. Animal Production 35: 209214.Google Scholar
Pond, W. G., Jung, H. G. and Varel, V. H. 1988. Effect of dietary fiber on young adult genetically lean, obese and contemporary pigs: body weight, carcass measurements, organ weights and digesta content. Journal of Animal Science 66: 699706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, W. G. and Kass, M. 1977. Higher fibre diets for swine. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, 1977, pp. 133138.Google Scholar
Powley, J. S., Cheeke, P. R., England, D. C., Davidson, T. P. and Kennick, W. H. 1981. Performance of growing-finishing swine fed high levels of alfalfa meal: effects of alfalfa level, dietary additives and antibiotics. Journal of Animal Science 53: 308316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. A., Murison, S. D. and Chesson, A. 1987. Estimation of the potential digestibility and rate of degradation of water-insoluble dietary fiber in the pig cecum with a modified nylon bag technique. Journal of Nutrition 117: 14021409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanogias, G. and Pearce, G. R. 1985a. The digestion of fibre by pigs. 1. The effects of amount and type of fibre on apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance and rate of passage. British Journal of Nutrition 53: 513530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanogias, G. and Pearce, G. R. 1985b. The digestion of fibre by pigs. 3. Effects of the amount and type of fibre on physical characteristics of segments of the gastrointestinal tract. British Journal Nutrition 53: 537548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van soest, P. J. 1973. Collaborative study of aciddetergent fiber and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 56: 781784.Google Scholar