Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:34:25.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dietary fibre for sows: effects of large amounts of soluble and insoluble fibres in the pregnancy period on the performance of sows during three reproductive cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E.-M. Vestergaard  and
V. Danielsen
E.-M. Vestergaard
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
V. Danielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

One hundred and twenty crossbred gilts and sows were used in an experiment with three differently composed pregnancy diets in order to study the effects on performance during three reproduction cycles. Treatments during pregnancy were: (1) a standard diet; (2) 500 g sugar-beet pulp per kg diet; (3) 500 g mixture of green grass-meal, wheat bran and oat hulls per kg diet. Sows were given similar levels of estimated daily net energy (NE). All three groups were given the same standard lactation diet semi-ad libitum in two daily meals. Recordings were made of food intake during pregnancy and lactation, body weight of sows at mating, farrowing and weaning, days until first mating, litter size, and mean piglet weight at birth and weaning. Pregnancy food intake (kg) was highest in diet 3 and lowest in diet 1 (P < 0·001). Food intake was lower for sows given diet 2 than for sows given diets 1 and 3, when measured in NEfor pigs (P < 0·001). Food intake during lactation was higher for sows given diet 2, than for sows in the two other diet groups (P < 0·01). Results were consistent during all three experimental rounds. Mean body weight of sows was the same for all diet groups both at mating, farrowing and weaning. Weight gain during pregnancy and weight loss at farrowing was significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1 (P < 0·001). Litter size was not affected by the different pregnancy diets, neither total number live born nor weaned. Both mean piglet weight and total mean litter weight at birth were negatively influenced by diet 2 (P < 0·001) and (P < 0·05) respectively. This indicates that a diet with a high content of soluble dietary fibre and a large capacity to induce satiety may have a negative effect on piglet weight at birth. At weaning, however, the mean weights of piglets were the same for the three diet groups. It was concluded, that it is possible to feed pregnant sows very differently composed diets without detrimental effects on performance.

Keywords

fibre contentlactationlitter sizepregnancysows
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , October 1998 , pp. 355 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1971. EEC-method of analysis. L279/7 (71/393/EØF).Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1978. Tecator method. Determination of crude fibre in some feed and food samples by using the fibertec system and Weende method. Appl. note 01. Tecator AB, Höganäs, Sweden.Google Scholar
Appleby, M. C. and Lawrence, A. B. 1987. Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production 45: 103–110.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. AOAC-method. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, K. E., Eggum, B. O., Steenfeldt, S. and Barsting, C. 1995. The nutritive value of decorticated mill fractions of wheat. 1. Chemical composition of raw and enzyme treated fractions and balance experiments with rats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 52: 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D. M. 1988. The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouns, F., Edwards, S. A. and English, P. R. 1995. Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54: 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1986. Some aspects of the nutritional requirements of sows: their relevance in the development of a feeding strategy. Livestock Production Science 15: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H., Noblet, J. and Heavens, R. P. 1984. The partition of body-weight gain in the pregnant sow. Livestock Production Science 11: 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, M. T., Diggs, B. G., Handlin, D. L., Knabe, D. A., Maxwell, C. V. Jr, Noland, P. R., Prince, T. J. and Gromwell, G. L. 1994. Effects of dietary energy during gestation and lactation on reproductive performance of sows: a cooperative study. Journal of Animal Science 72: 4–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, D. J. A. and Chadd, S. A. 1989. Voluntary food intake of growing pigs. In Voluntary food intake of pigs (ed. Forbes, J. M., Varley, M. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no 13, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, J. R., Charlton, S. T., Cosgrove, S. J., Zak, L. J. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1995. Interactions between nutrition and reproduction in the pig. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 30: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, V., Eklundh Larsen, A. and Nielsen, H. E. 1983. Fodring af diegivende søer efter aedelyst. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences — report, no. 494, p. 4.Google Scholar
Dantzer, R. 1986. Behavioral, physiological and functional aspects of stereotyped behavior: a review and a reinterpretation. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1776–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourmad, J. Y. 1991. Standing and feeding behaviour of the lactating sow: effect of feeding level during pregnancy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourmad, J. Y., Etienne, M., Prunier, A. and Noblet, J. 1993.The effect of energy and protein intake of sows on their longevity. Forty-fourth meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Aarhus, Denmark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I. J. H., Rushen, J. and Lawrence, A. B. 1993. Conclusions and implications for animal welfare. In Stereotypic animal behaviour: fundamentals and applications to welfare (ed. Lawrence, A. B. and Rushen, J.), pp. 193–206. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A. 1992. Scientific perspectives on loose housing systems for dry sows. Pig Veterinary Journal 28: 40–51.Google Scholar
Farmer, C., Robert, S. and Matte, J. J. 1996. Lactation performance of sows fed a bulky diet during gestation and receiving growth hormone-releasing factor during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1298–1306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernändez, J. A., Jørgensen, H. and Just, A. 1986. Comparative digestibility experiments with growing pigs and adult sows. Animal Production 43: 127–132.Google Scholar
Jindal, R., Cosgrove, J. R. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1997. Progesterone mediates nutritionally induced effects on embryonic survival in gilts. Journal of Animal Science 75: 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, H., Zhao, X.-Q. and Eggum, B. O. 1996. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hindgut and energy metabolism in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 75: 365–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, A. 1982. The net energy value of balanced diets for growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 8: 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G. J. 1991. Stereotypy: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matte, J. J., Robert, S., Girard, C. L., Farmer, C. and Martineau, G. P. 1994. Effect of bulky diets based on wheat bran or oat hulls on reproductive performance of sows during their first two parities. Journal of Animal Science 72: 1754–1760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, L. R. and Ladewig, J. 1994. Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions. Animal Behaviour 47: 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, R. L., Cornelius, S. G., Pettigrew, J. E., Hanke, H. E., Heeg, T. R. and Miller, K. P. 1987. Influence of postpartum feeding method on performance of the lactating sow. Livestock Production Science 16: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neil, M., Ogle, B. and Annèr, K. 1996. A two-diet system and ad libitum lactation feeding of the sow. 1. Sow performance. Animal Science 62: 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahly, T. S., Cromwell, G. L. and Simpson, W. S. 1979. Effects of full vs restricted feeding of the sow immediately postpartum on lactation performance. Journal of Animal Science 49: 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1995. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6, 11th edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stoldt, W. 1952. Vorschlag zur Vereinheitlichung der Fettbestimmung in Lebensmitteln. Fette und Seifen 54: 206–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, E. M. C. and Lawrence, A. B. 1993. Long-term effects of food allowance and housing on development of stereotypies in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, E. M. C., Lawrence, A. B. and Illius, A. W. 1991. Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Animal Behaviour 42: 981–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, E.-M., Danielsen, V., Larsen, A. E. and Bejerholm, C. 1996. Dried grass meal for finishing pigs and pregnant sows. Danish Institute of Agricultural Science — report no. 50, p. 36.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, E.-M., Jensen, K. H. and Vestergaard, K. S. 1998. Dietary fibre for pregnant sows: effects of large amounts of soluble- or insoluble fibre on behaviour and profile of nutrient uptake in connection with the afternoon meal.Physiology and Behaviour In press.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. 1993. The science and practice of pig production. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group UK Ltd, England.Google Scholar
Xue, J. L., Koketsu, Y., Dial, G. D., Pettigrew, J. and Sower, A. 1997. Glucose tolerance, luteinizing hormone release, and reproductive performance of first-litter sows fed two levels of energy during gestation. Journal of Animal Science 75: 1845–1852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, T., Longland, A. C., Close, W. H, Sharpe, C. E. and Keal, H. D. 1995. The digestion of dry matter and non-starch polysaccharides from diets containing plain sugar-beet pulp or wheat straw by pregnant sows. Animal Science 61: 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., Eastham, P. R., Phillips, P. and Whittemore, C. T. 1989. Reproductive performance, body weight and body condition of breeding sows with differing body fatness at parturition, differing nutrition during lactation, and differing litter size. Animal Production 48: 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar