Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:51:43.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of solid food intake in calves 5. The relationship between liquid and solid food intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Hodgson
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Sciences, The University, Leeds
Get access

Summary

Reconstituted milk substitute was given at two concentrations of powder (10% and 20%), each at four levels (10% powder—8, 12, 16 and 20% of live weight (LW); 20% powder—6, 8, 10 and 12% of LW) to 3 British Friesian male calves per treatment from 2 to 4 weeks after arrival, and the calves were weaned over the next 7 days. Chopped dried grass was offered to appetite before and for 3 weeks after weaning. The amount of solid food eaten was not affected by the dry-matter concentration of the milk substitute, but was significantly depressed as the amount of milk consumed increased. Between-treatment differences in solid food intake established at weaning persisted until the end of the experiment. There was a dose, positive relationship between milk intake and live-weight gain (LWG) before weaning, but weight gain after weaning was not significantly affected by the level of milk intake before weaning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burt, A. W. A. and Bell, E. O. 1962. Effect of the level and concentration of liquid milk substitutes fed to early weaned calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 131136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Vies, D. A. R. and Owen, J. B. 1967. The intensive rearing of lambs. 1. Some factors affecting performance in the liquid feeding period. Anim. Prod. 9: 501508.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1965. The effect of weaning treatment on the development of solid food intake in calves. Anim. Prod. 7: 717.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971. The development of solid food intake in calves. 4. The effect of the addition of material to the rumen, or its removal from the rumen, on voluntary food intake. Anim. Prod. 13: 581592.Google Scholar
Hussain, M. Z. 1963. Factors affecting the performance of early weaned calves. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. 1965. The effect of concentration of milk substitute on the performance of artificially reared lambs. Anim. Prod. 7: 325332.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. and Pearce, J. 1965. A note on the effect of certain variables on the performance of early-weaned calves. Anim. Prod. 7: 393396.Google Scholar
Mathieu, C-M. and Wegat-Litré, E. 1961. Mise au point d'une méthode d'alimentation de veaux d'élevage. 1. Détermination de la quantité de lait nécessaire. Annls Zootech. 10: 161175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, C-M. and Wegat-Litré, E. 1962. Mise au point d'une méthode d'alimentation des veaux d'élevage. II. Modalites de la répartition du lait. Annls Zootech. 11: 197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D. 1967. Artificial rearing of lambs. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1966, pp. 8692.Google Scholar
Quayle, P. D. 1958. The early weaning of calves. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Durham.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1964. The nutrition of intensively-reared calves. Vet. Rec. 76: 511526.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Shillam, K. W. G., Hawkins, G. M. and Lang, J. 1958. The milk requirements of the newborn calf. Br. J. Nutr. 12: 123137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spedding, C. R. W., Brown, T. H. and Large, R. V. 1963. The effect of milk intake on nematode infestation of the lamb. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 22: 3241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1966. The appetite and live-weight gain of calves fed ad libitum on both grass and cold or warm milk. Tech. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. No. 3.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar