Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:25:38.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cycling ambient temperature effect on boar semen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. Heitman Jr ,
J. R. Cockrell  and
S. R. Morrison
H. Heitman Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science
J. R. Cockrell
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science
S. R. Morrison
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-four 1-year-old boars of proven fertility were assigned randomly to one of two temperature-controlled trailers. A control group in each trial was held at 17 ± 0·5°C while the other group was exposed to a diurnal ambient temperature cycle. Cycles followed a sine-wave pattern with minimum and maximum temperatures occurring at 04.00 and 16.00 h respectively. Cycling temperature ranges were 17 to 33 ± 0·5°C (low-temperature stress), 19·5 to 35·5 ± 0·5°C (medium-temperature stress), and 22 to 38 ± 0·5°C (high-temperature stress). Semen samples were collected every 3 or 4 days over an experimental period of 42 days.

Low-temperature stress and medium-temperature stress boars were not affected significantly in the five parameters of semen quality observed. The difference between controls and high-temperature stress boars was highly significant for motility, abnormal spermatozoa, gel-free volume, and total spermatozoa per ejaculate. Concentration of spermatozoa was not affected by treatment. Significant time effects were observed for motility, abnormal spermatozoa and total spermotozoa per ejaculate. Significant differences began to appear after 2 or 3 weeks and changes still appeared to be occurring at 6 weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 129 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Christenson, R. K., Teague, H. S., Grifo, A. P. Jr, and Roller, W. L. 1972. The effects of high environmental temperature on the boar. Ohio Swine Res. Inf. Rep., Res. Summary Ohio agric. Res. Dev. Centre, No. 61.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple-range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbunike, G. N. and Dede, T. I. 1980. The influence of short-term exposure to tropical sunlight on boar seminal characteristics. Int. J. Biomet. 24: 129–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Givens, R. L., Morrison, S. R., Bond, T. E. and Miller, C. R. 1971. Temporary facilities for some animal environmental studies. U.S. Dep. Agric, ARS-42-191.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. 1974. Reproduction in Farm Animals. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Hill, H. J. 1956. Morphology of bovine semen and its relative importance in evaluation of breeding soundness. Rep. Anim. Reprod. Lab., Colo. St. Univ., Fort Collins.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. R. 1956. Extension of multiple-range tests ot group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12: 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNitt, J. I. and First, N. L. 1970. Effect of 72-hour heat stress on semen quality in boars. Int. J. Biomet. 14: 373–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzarri, G., Du mesnil du buisson, F. and Ortavant, R. 1968. Action of temperature on spermatogenesis, sperm production and fertility of the boar. Rèsumès VI Congr. Reprod. Insèm. Artif, Paris, p. 71 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. M. and Vandemark, N. L. 1961. Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle, p. 385. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Speer, V. C. 1968. Effect of temperature and humidity on reproduction. In Effects of Disease and Stress on Reproductive Efficiency in Swine, pp. 21–26. University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Thibault, C., Courot, M., Martinet, L., Mauleon, P., Du mesnil du buisson, F., Ortavant, R., Pelletier, J. and Signoret, J. P. 1966. Regulation of breeding season and estrus cycles by light and external stimuli in some mammals. J. Anim. Sci. 25: Suppl., p. 119 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wettemann, R. P., Wells, M. E. and Johnson, R. K. 1979. Reproductive characteristics of boars during and after exposure to increased ambient temperature. J. Anim. Sci. 49: 1501–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettemann, R. P., Wells, M. E., Omtvedt, I. T., Pope, C. E. and Turman, E. J. 1976. Influence of elevated ambient temperature on reproductive performance of boars. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 664–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed