Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:14:41.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concentrations of blood constituents in genetically high and low milk-production lines of British Friesian and Jersey cattle around calving and in early lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. P. Gibson ,
A. C. Field  and
G. Wiener
J. P. Gibson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
A. C. Field
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, 408 Gilmerton Road, Edinburgh EH17 7JH
G. Wiener
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

Differences between Friesians and Jerseys and between progeny of high and low contemporary comparison (CC) sires were sought by examining nine blood constituent concentrations around first and second calvings and during lactation. A total of 1359 samples from animals at first lactation and 1148 samples at second lactation were collected. All animals were individually fed a complete pelleted diet ad libitum. Blood constituents analysed were free fatty acids (FFA), ketones, glucose, calcium, magnesium, copper, phosphorus, albumin and globulin. All nine constituents showed marked changes around parturition and early lactation and several constituents showed changes with age. Jerseys had higher average copper and albumin levels and lower globulin levels than Friesians at both lactations and higher FFA concentrations at second lactation. Changes in plasma concentrations of FFA, ketones and glucose around calving were consistent in suggesting that Jerseys and progeny of high CC sires had a substantially greater energy deficit in early lactation than Friesians and progeny of low CC sires at the first but not the second lactation. Predicted requirements v. recorded intakes suggested that the Jerseys and high CC progeny had the greater energy deficit at both lactations. Although the incidence of hypocalcaemia was nearly zero, changes of calcium and magnesium concentrations were consistent with reports of Jerseys being more susceptible to hypocalcaemia in later life.

Despite large differences in milk yield, differences in plasma concentrations between animals classified as either high or low achieved yielders within their genetic class were generally smaller than differences between progeny of high and low CC sires.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 183 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Bowden, D. M. 1971. Non-esterified fatty acids and ketone bodies in blood as indicators of nutritional status in ruminants: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1986. Efficiency and performance of genetically high and low milk-producing British Friesian and Jersey cattle. Animal Production 42: 161–182.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P., Wiener, G. and Field, A. C. 1986. Concentrations of blood constituents from 12 to 72 weeks of age in genetically high and low milk production lines of Friesian and Jersey cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halse, K. 1970. Individual variation in blood magnesium and susceptability to hypomagnesaemia in cows. Acta Veterinarae Scandinavica 11: 394–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henricson, B., Jonsson, G. and Pehrson, B. 1975. Serum calcium and magnesium levels during pregnancy and at calving in heifers and young cows, and the relationship between these components and the incidence of puerperal paresis in older half-sisters. Zentralblatt fur Veterinärmedizin A 22: 625–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchenham, B. A. and Rowlands, G. J. 1976. Differences in the concentrations of certain blood constituents among cows in a dairy herd. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86: 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchenham, B. R., Rowlands, G. J. and Shorbagi, H. 1975. Relationships of concentrations of certain blood constituents with milk yield and age of cows in dairy herds. Research in Veterinary Science 18: 249–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, F. 1982. Sammerhangen mellem tyrekalves avlsvaerdi for smorfedtydelse og plasmaknocentration af glukose, FFA, urinstof, insulin og tyroxin ved ad-libitum fodring, faste og gen-fodring. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Martens, H. and Rayssiguier, Y. 1980. Magnesium metabolism and hypomagnesaemia. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P.), pp. 447–466. MPT Press, Lancaster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, H. 1968. Vererburg und Krankheit bei Haustieren. Verlag and Schaper, Hannover.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board 1980. British FriesianlHolstein Bulls with Improved Contemporary Comparisons, pp. ii–iv. Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton.Google Scholar
Penhale, W. J. and Christie, G. 1969. Quantitative studies on bovine immunoglobulins. I. Adult plasma and colostrum levels. Research in Veterinary Science 10: 493–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philipsson, J., Thaevelin, B. and Hedebro-Velander, I. 1980. Genetic studies on disease recordings in first lactation cows of Swedish dairy breeds. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 30: 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. J., Reid, I. M., Dew, S. M., Stark, A. J., Baird, G. D., Collins, R. and Mather, D. 1978. The effects of underfeeding for 6 months during pregnancy and lactation on blood constituents, milk yield and body weight of dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90: 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A., Paver, H., Barden, P. and Marr, T. G. 1960. Fasting metabolism of the lactating cow. Research in Veterinary Science 1: 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, G. J. 1980. A review of variations in the concentration of metabolities in the blood of beef and dairy cattle associated with physiology, nutrition and disease, with particular reference to the interpretation of metabolic profiles. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 35: 172–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, G. J., Little, W. and Kitchenham, B. A. 1977. Relationships between blood composition and fertility in dairy cows — a field study. Journal of Dairy Research 44: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, W. S. 1973. Compreg users' guide. IURC Series Report No. 5. Program Library Unit, Edinburgh Regional Computer Centre.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Solbu, H. 1983. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle. 1. Disease incidences and non-genetic effects on mastitis, ketosis and milk fever. Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie 100: 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilakaratne, N., Alliston, J. C., Carr, W. R., Land, R. B. and Osmond, T. J. 1980. Physiological attributes as possible selection criteria for milk production. 1. Study of metabolites in Friesian calves of high or low genetic merit. Animal Production 30: 327–340.Google Scholar
Treacher, R. J., Little, W., Collis, K. A. and Stark, A. J. 1976. The influence of dietary protein intake on milk production and blood composition of high-yielding dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 43: 357–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, G., Russell, W. S. and Field, A. C. 1980. Factors influencing the concentration of minerals and metabolites in the plasma of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94: 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. R. and Millar, P. 1979. Changes in serum immunoglobulin levels in Jerseys and Friesians near calving. Research in Veterinary Science 26: 81–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed