Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:45:13.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight 2. Growth changes in muscle distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. S. Davies
A. S. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Edinburgh, EH9 1QH
Get access

Summary

Half carcasses of 18 Pietrain and 18 Large White female pigs were each dissected into 93 muscle units. An allometric analysis of the weight of these units relative to total muscle revealed increasing craniocaudal and distoproximal growth gradients, which were more pronounced in the Pietrain.

The greater total weight of muscle, shown previously for the Pietrain at any given body weight over the range studied, was not due to higher muscle weights in any particular region at birth, but at 60 kg body weight was due to heavier high impetus muscles. Heart weight relative to total muscle weight was higher for the Large White over the entire range.

It is concluded that for the animals studied the changes in muscle distribution are related to the functional demands of an increase in body size, and that the muscle distribution of pigs can differ between breeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , December 1974 , pp. 377 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altman, P. L. and Dittmer, D. S. (Eds.) 1962. Growth, including Reproduction and Morphological Development. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Washingtdn D.C.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. 1960. Moles and shrews. In Wild Animals of North America (ed. Grosvenor, M. B., Severy, M. and McClung, R. M.), pp. 321–325. The National Geographical Society, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. and Mukhoty, H. M. 1970. Lean distribution in carcasses from bulls, steers and heifers of various breeds. The 49th Annual Feeder's Day Report: pp. 40–41. Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Brannang, E. 1971. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XXIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the development of single muscles, bones and special sex characters. Part II. Swedish. J agric. Res. 1: 69–78.Google Scholar
Burton, M. 1965. Systematic Dictionary of Mammals of the World. 2nd ed.Museum Press, London.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1964. Relative growth of the musculature of the ox. In Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals, Technical Conference, University of Melbourne, 1963 (ed. Tribe, D. E.), pp. 7–1 to 7-20. CSIRO, East Melbourne.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966. A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Res. vet. Set. 7: 326–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthbertson, A. and Pomeroy, R. W. 1962. Quantitative anatomical studies of the composition of the pig at 50, 68 and 92 kg carcass weight. II. Gross composition and skeletal composition. J agric. Sci., Camb. 59: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. S. 1972. Postnatal changes in the histochemical fibre types of porcine skeletal muscle. J. Anat. 113: 213–240.Google Scholar
Davies, A. S. 1974. A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight. 1. Growth changes in carcass composition. Anim. Prod. 19: 367–376.Google Scholar
Dehave, L. 1962. Dix annees de selection et d'observation de la race porcin Pietrain. Revue Agric, Brux. 15: 35–52.Google Scholar
Dumont, B. L., Schmitt, O. and Roy, G. 1969. Development musculaire compare de pores Pietrain et Large-White. Reel Med. vet. Éc. Alfort 145: 937–947.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. A Survey of the Problems involved in Meat Production. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Haring, F., Steinbach, J. and Scheven, B. 1966. Untersuchungen über den mutterlichen Einfluss auf die prä- und post-natale Entwicklung von Schweinen extrem unterschiedlicher Grösse. I Wachstumsstudien an reziprolen Bastarden von Riese (Deutches veredeltes Landschwein) und Zwerg (Vietnamese) in Vergleich zu Schweinen der Ausgangs populationen. Z. Tierzücht. Zucht Biol. 82: 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwai-Ping, S. and Huggins, R. A. 1971. Growth of the beagle: changes in chemical composition. Growth 35: 369–376.Google Scholar
Lohse, C. L. 1973. The influence of sex on muscle growth in Merino sheep. Growth 37: 177–187.Google ScholarPubMed
Lohse, C. L., Moss, F. P. and Butterfield, R. M. 1971. Growth patterns of muscles of Merino sheep from birth to 517 days. Anim. Prod. 13: 117–126.Google Scholar
Marrable, A. W. 1971. The Embryonic Pig: a Chronological Account. Pitman Medical, London.Google Scholar
Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. 1968. International Committee on Veterinary Anatomical Nomenclature, Vienna.Google Scholar
Richmond, R. J. and Berg, R. T. 1971. Muscle growth and distribution in swine as influenced by liveweight, breed, sex and ration. Can. J Anim. Sci. 51: 41–49.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1968. A dissection study of the distribution of tissues in lamb carcasses. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7: 297–302.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, R. and Dillard, E. U. 1966. Relationship of dam's weight and weight changes of calf's growth rate in Hereford cattle. J Anim. Sci. 25: 1063–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, A. and Hammond, J. 1938. Maternal effects on growth and conformation in Shire horse and Shetland pony crosses. Proc. R. Soc. 125B: 311–335.Google Scholar