Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:43:54.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of testing schemes for pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1959

Charles Smith
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9
Get access

Extract

Using extensions to Robertson's (1957) method for finding the optimum test design, factors affecting the improvement from testing were studied. Other than the heritability, the ratio of the number tested (N) to the number required for breeding stock (T) has the largest effect on the improvement expected, the improvement being roughly proportional to the logarithm of this ratio. The type of family and the number in the test group which compose the optimum design, also depend largely on the ratio N/T. Accuracy in evaluation is required when only few animals are selected (N/T high), but small test groups from large families are necessary when large numbers of breeding stock are required (N/T low).

Testing schemes differ basically in their selection procedure and only secondarily in their designs. The advantage resulting from the tested animals being themselves selected is in proportion to what part they constitute of the total selected.

Another consideration is how the testing is integrated with the population breeding structure. Maximum improvement will be obtained if the testing facilities are restricted to a nucleus group of breeders, and full opportunity for selection is made in their stocks. The increased improvement this providesis accumulated in this nucleus group of herds and gradually passed down to the rest of the herds. Otherwise the improvement will be greatest when each breeder can use sires from families which have performed well in thetesting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dickerson, G. E., & Hazel, L. N., 1944. Effectiveness of selection on progeny performance as a supplement to earlier culling in livestock. J. agric. Res., 69: 459.Google Scholar
Osborne, R., 1957. The use of sire and dam family averages in increasing the efficiency of selective breeding under a hierarchical mating system. Heredity., 11: 93.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., 1957. Optimum group size in progeny testing and family selection, Biometrics., 13: 442.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., & Asker, A. A., 1951. The genetic history and breed-structure of British Friesian cattle. Emp.J. exp. Agric., 19: 113.Google Scholar
Smith, G., 1958. Efficiency of testing schemes in swine. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis Iowa State College Library, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., 1953. Breed structure in the pedigree Ayrshire cattle population in Great Britain. J. agric. Sci., 43: 123.Google Scholar