Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:33:56.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of reciprocal progeny tests amongst Holstein-Friesian sires from Canada and the United States of America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. M. Hinks  and
A. Zarnecki
C. J. M. Hinks
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh
A. Zarnecki
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

The test proofs of 29 Holstein-Friesian sires (12 Canadian and 17 US) with milking daughters in both Canada and the USA were compared. The mean test rating of the Canadian and US sires respectively was 125±74 kg and 265±57 kg higher in Canada than in the United States.

These results were supported by others obtained in milking trials in Denmark and West Germany.

The fat percentage of US Holstein progeny was higher in Canada and Europe than in the USA, suggesting that the low fat percentage of the US Holstein in its country of origin cannot be attributed simply to lack of genetic potential.

It is suggested that the US Holstein be considered as a substitute for the Canadian for the improvement of milking performance in European Friesian populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 223 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Canada Department Of Agriculture. 1969-1972. 20-26th Reports on Sire Appraisal. Livestock Division, Production and Marketing Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Canada Department Of Agriculture. 1972. Canadian Record of Performance for Purebred Dairy Cattle. Summary Report for 1971.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E. P. 1973. Comparison of North American Holsteins and European Friesians for dairy production, beef production and size (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Elleby, F. 1973. [130- and 305-day sire assessments.] Husdrybrugsudvalget, Arhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Gravert, H. O. 1966. Selection for milk, butterfat and beef production in European Friesians. Proc. IXth int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edin., pp. 314–325.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. and King, J. W. B. 1971. The exchange of control semen for breed comparisons. Proc. E.A.A.P. Cattle Commission, Versailles.Google Scholar
Lee, A. J. 1970. Genetic differences between studs, regions and countries. Proc. Ontario Association of Animal Breeders Meeting, Ontario, 1970.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. O. and Vesth, B. 1971. [Bull Progeny Tests.] Report No. 387, Forsøgslaboratorium, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Sheer, E., Wagner, D. and Miller, P. 1972. A brief comparison of U.S.D.A. and Canadian proofs on Holstein bulls (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Stegenga, Th. 1967. The Friesian as a dairy breed and a beef producer. Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Zootechnics, Milan, pp. 219–227.Google Scholar
U.S. Department Of Agriculture. 1969-1972. DHIA Sire Summary Lists.Google Scholar