Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:31:26.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Friesian, Canadian Hereford × Friesian and Simmental × Friesian steers for growth and carcass composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. G. Keane  and
G. J. More O'Ferrall
M. G. Keane
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
G. J. More O'Ferrall
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

One hundred and twenty spring-born steers comprised of 40 Friesians (FR), 40 Canadian Hereford × Friesians (HF) and 40 Simmental × Friesians (SM) were reared together from shortly after birth to slaughter after a mean period of 740 days. During the finishing winter there was a 3 (breed types) × 2 (3 and 6 kg supplementary concentrates per head daily with grass silage ad libitum) × 2 (222- and 225-day finishing periods) factorial arrangement of treatments. One side from each of 96 carcasses (eight per treatment) was completely separated into bone, muscle, intermuscular fat and subcutaneous fat and a 10th rib sample of m. longissimus was chemically analysed.

Carcass weights per day of age and carcass weights were 404, 433 and 449 (s.e. 4·6) g and 301, 320 and 330 (s.e. 3·4) kg for FR, HF and SM, respectively. Corresponding proportions of carcass muscle were 602, 577 and 628 (s.e. 4·8) g/kg. FR and HF had similar proportions of their total muscle in the hindquarter, whereas SM had more of their muscle in the hindquarter. M. longissimus lipid concentrations for FR, HF and SM were 36, 39 and 26 (s.e. 1·96) g/kg. Increasing supplementary concentrate level from 3 to 6 kg/day increased side weight by 7 kg, of which proportionately 0·48 was fat. Extending the finishing period from 121 to 225 days increased side weight by 22 kg of which proportionately 0·45 was fat. Both the higher concentrate level and the longer finishing period reduced carcass muscle and bone proportions, and increased carcass fat proportion. Allometric regression coefficients for side muscle, bone and fat weights on side weight were 0·75, 0·51 and 2·13, respectively. It was calculated that FR, HF and SM would have similar carcass fat proportions at approximate carcass weights of 320, 290 and 380 kg, respectively.

Keywords

beef cattlecarcass compositiongrowth
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 377 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, B. B., Liboriussen, T., Kousgaard, K. and Buchter, L. 1977. Crossbreeding experiment with beef and dual-purpose sire breeds on Danish dairy cows. III. Daily gain, feed conversion and carcass quality of intensively fed young bulls. Livestock Production Science 4: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. L., Carter, A. H., Morris, C. A. and Johnson, D. L. 1990. Evaluation of eleven cattle breeds for crossbred beef production: performance of progeny up to 13 months of age. Animal Production 50: 63–77.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978a. Growth of bovine tissues. 1. Genetic influences on growth patterns of muscle, fat and bone in young bulls. Animal Production 26: 245–258.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978b. Growth of bovine tissues. 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27: 51–61.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978c. Growth of bovine tissues. 3. Genetic influences on patterns of fat growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27: 63–70.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978d. Growth of bovine tissues. 4. Genetic influences on patterns of bone growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27: 71–77.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office (Dublin). 1991. Statistical Bulletin 66: 259.Google Scholar
De Boer, H., Dumont, B. L., Pomeroy, R. W. and Weniger, J. H. 1974. Manual on E.A.A.P. reference methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Livestock Production Science 1: 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture and Food. 1991. Cattle artificial insemination service — insemination by breeds for 12 months. Department of Agriculture and Food, Dublin.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. and Keane, M. G. 1987. Responses to supplementary concentrates for finishing steers fed silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 115–127.Google Scholar
Ferrell, C. L., Kohlmeier, R. H., Crouse, J. D. and Glimp, H. 1978. Influence of dietary energy, protein and biological type of steer upon rate of gain and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 46: 255–270.Google Scholar
Flynn, A. V. 1981. Systems of beef production from dairy herd calves. In Calf to Beef. Handbook series No. 17, pp. 1–3An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Flynn, A. V. 1985. Beef production from Friesian calves. Veterinary Update 1: 34–36.Google Scholar
Geay, Y. and Robelin, J. 1979. Variation of meat production capacity in cattle due to genotype and level of feeding: genotype-nutrition interaction. Livestock Production Science 6: 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, M. G., Allen, P., Connolly, J. and More O'Ferrall, G. J. 1991. Chemical composition of carcass soft tissues of serially slaughtered Hereford × Friesian, Friesian and Charolais × Friesian steers finished on two diets differing in energy concentration. Animal Production 52: 93–104.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Drennan, M. J. 1980. Effects of diet type and feeding level on performance, carcass composition and efficiency of Friesian steers serially slaughtered. Irish journal of Agricultural Research 19: 53–66.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Drennan, M. J. 1987. Lifetime growth and carcass composition of heifers and steers non-implanted or sequentially implanted with anabolic agents. Animal Production 45: 359–369.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Drennan, M. J. 1990. Two year old beef production from Friesian and Friesian cross steers. Beef series No. 9, Teagasc, Dublin.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G., More O'Ferrall, G. J. and Connolly, J. 1989. Growth and carcass composition of Friesian, Limousin × Friesian and Blonde d'Aquitaine × Friesian steers. Animal Production 48: 353–365.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G., More O'Ferrall, G. J., Connolly, J. and Allen, P. 1990. Carcass composition of serially slaughtered Friesian, Hereford × Friesian and Charolais × Friesian steers finished on two dietary energy levels. Animal Production 50: 231–243.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D. and Smith, R. J. 1976. Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 2. Distribution between joints. Animal Production 23: 223–232.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Southgate, J. R. 1982. A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds in 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 2. Carcass characteristics, and rate and efficiency of meat gain. Animal Production 34: 167–178.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Southgate, J. R. 1988. Evaluation of British Friesian, Canadian Holstein and beef breed × British Friesian steers slaughtered over a commercial range of fatness from 16-month and 24-month beef production systems. 2. Carcass characteristics and rate and efficiency of lean gain. Animal Production 46: 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1976. Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 1. Distribution between depots. Animal Production 23: 25–34.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Jones, D. W. 1977. Bone weight distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses, and the prediction of carcass bone content from the bone content of joints. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89: 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Smith, R. J. 1976. Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87: 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
More O'Ferrall, G. J. and Keane, M. G. 1990. A comparison for live weight and carcass production of Charolais, Hereford and Friesian steer progeny from Friesian cows finished on two energy levels and serially slaughtered. Animal Production 50: 19–28.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A., Baker, R. L., Carter, A. H. and Hickey, S. M. 1990. Evaluation of eleven cattle breeds for crossbred beef production: carcass data from males slaughtered at two ages. Animal Production 50: 79–92.Google Scholar
Muck, R. E., O'Kiely, P. and Moran, J. 1990. Low pH grass silage. Animal Production Research Report, 1989/90, p. 77. Teagasc, Dublin.Google Scholar
Riordan, E. B. and Mellon, K. 1978. Beef carcass classification as an aid to prediction of carcass value. Irish Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology 7: 9–32.Google Scholar
Riordan, E. B., Schwer, S. J. and Godson, C. 1978. Beef cuts code: specifications for cutting and trimming of beef. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. and Tulloh, N. M. 1968. Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. II. Dissected components of the commercially dressed and jointed carcass. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B., Cundiff, L. V. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle. II. Postweaning growth and feed efficiency of steers. Journal of Animal Science 43: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, J. R., Cook, G. L. and Kempster, A. J. 1982. A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds in 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 1. Live-weight gain and efficiency of food utilization. Animal Production 34: 155–166.Google Scholar
Southgate, J. R., Cook, G. L. and Kempster, A. J. 1988. Evaluation of British Friesian, Canadian Holstein and beef breed × British Friesian steers slaughtered over a commercial range of fatness from 16-month and 24-month beef production systems. 1. Live-weight gain and efficiency of food utilization. Animal Production 46: 353–364.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. K. and O'Kiely, P. 1990. A note on the chemical composition of Irish farm silage 1985–1988. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 71–75.Google Scholar