Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:31:58.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative performance and body composition of control and selection line large white pigs 2. Feeding to appetite for a fixed time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Ellis ,
W. C. Smith ,
Ruth Henderson ,
C. T. Whittemore  and
R. Laird
M. Ellis
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
W. C. Smith
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Ruth Henderson
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
C. T. Whittemore
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
R. Laird
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
Get access

Abstract

Food intake was individually measured for Large White control (C) and 10th generation index-selected (S) pigs fed twice daily to appetite on a fixed time trial. Thirty-nine C and 38 S boars were slaughtered, their carcasses dissected and whole empty bodies minced and chemically analysed after an 84-day trial starting at 28·6 ± 0·30 kg live weight. S boars ate proportionately 0·08 less than C boars in the first 42 days of the trial (79 v. 86 kg, P < 0·01), but S and C boars ate similar amounts (114 v. 117 kg, NS) in the last 42 days. S boars grew 0-04 faster than C boars (918 v. 886 g per day, NS), and had 0·09 better food conversion efficiency (0·404 v. 0·369 gain per kg food, P < 0·001). S boars contained more water than C boars (53·5 v. 48·9 kg, P < 0·001), more protein (15-4 v. 14-2 kg, P < 0·01), less lipid (20·8 v. 25·1 kg, P < 0·001), less gross energy (1 199 v. 1 357 MJ, P < 0·01) but a similar amount of ash. S carcasses had 3 kg more lean (36·5 v. 33·5 kg, P < 0·001) and more bone than C carcasses (7·14 v. 6·71 kg, P < 0·05), but contained 3 kg less total fat (19·6 v. 22·6 kg, P < 0·01). The lean tissue growth rate of S boars was 327 g per day which was 31 g per day faster than for C boars (P < 0·001). Appetite reduction in S boars enhanced fatness differences between the lines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 407 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chadwick, J. P. 1977. Selection for economy of production and carcass lean content in Large White pigs and its influence on meat quality characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. 1968. PIDA dissection techniques. Proc. Symp. Meth. Carcass Evaluation, Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Dublin.Google Scholar
Ellis, M., Smith, W. C. and Laird, R. 1979. Correlated responses in feed intake to selection for economy of production and carcass lean content in Large White pigs. Anim. Prod. 28: 424 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Henderson, Ruth, Whittemore, C. T., Ellis, M., Smith, W. C. and Laird, R. 1982. Effects of index selection at bacon weight on early growth rate and body composition in Large White pigs. Anim. Prod. 35: 81–85.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ruth, Whittemore, C. T., Ellis, M., Smith, W. C.Laird, R. and Phillips, P. 1983. Comparative performance and body composition of control and selection line Large White pigs., 1. On a generous fixed feeding scale for a fixed time. Anim. Prod. 36: 399–405.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1977. Genstat V, Mark 4–01. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1980. Genstat V, Mark 403. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. 1979. Pig testing in the next ten years. Eur. Pig Testing Conf., Harrogate. Paper No. El.2.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Fowler, V. R. 1978. The importance of selection criteria and feeding regimes in the selection and improvement of pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 5: 415–423.Google Scholar
Tullis, J. Bronwyn, 1981. Protein growth in pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Vangen, O. 1980. Studies on a two trait selection experiment in pigs. Rep., Dep. Anim. Genetics and Breeding, Agric. Univ. Norway.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. and King, J. W. B. 1979. The influence of weaning regime on central testing station performance in pigs. Anim. Prod. 29: 203–212.Google Scholar