Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:11:35.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative growth in relation with the age assessed by skeletochronology in two mullet fishes of genus Liza

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Patón
Affiliation:
Unidad de Producción Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Extremadura, 10080 Cáceres, Spain
L. Cardona
Affiliation:
Divisió de Cièncias Experimentals i Matemàtiques, Departament de Biologia Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
E. Gisbert
Affiliation:
Divisió de Cièncias Experimentals i Matemàtiques, Departament de Biologia Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Get access

Abstract

We propose a new method for determining age in mullet fishes taking the thoracic spines as material of analysis. The relations length-age and tueight-age were evaluated by von Bertalanffy and logarithmic regressions. Both methods closely agreed with the observed data but the von Bertalanffy's model showed the best R2 values in both species. Two parameters related to growth speed; the K coefficient of von Bertalanffy's model and the slope of logarithmic regression, were higher in Liza ramada than in Liza saliens. However, our results show that mullet have both high rates of size-growth and weight-production, in comparison with other marine fishes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carlander, K. D. 1987. A history of scale age and growth studies of North American freshwater fish. In Age and growth of fish (ed. Carlander, K. D.), pp. 314. Iowa University Press, Iowa.Google Scholar
Cardona, L. and Castelló, F. 1990. Compositión química del alimento natural de diferentes mugilidos (Osteichthyes: Mugilidae) del Mediterráneo Norte. Adas III del Congreso National Acuicultura, pp. 157162.Google Scholar
Castanet, J. 1979. Donnes comparatives sur la mineralisation des marques de croissance squelettique chez des Vertebres. Etude par microradiographie quantitative. Coinptcs Rendus, Academic des Sciences Paris 289: 405408.Google Scholar
Drake, P. 1983. Biología de los mugilidos en los esteros de las salinas de San Fernando. Niveles de productión extensiva, crecimiento y relaciones troficas. Ph.D. thesis. Llniversidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Drake, P. and Arias, A. M. 1984. Biología de los mugílidos (Osteichthyes, Mugilidae) en los esteros de las salinas de San Fernando (Cádiz). II. Crecimiento relativo. Investigation Pesquera 48:157173.Google Scholar
Drake, P., Arias, A. M. and Rodríguez, R. B. 1984. Biología de los mugílidos (Osteichthyes, Mugilidae) en los esteros de las salinas de San Fernando (Cádiz). I. Crecimiento en longitud y peso. Investigation Pesquera 48: 134155.Google Scholar
Juarranz, A. and Patón, D. 1990. The use of acridine orange for age-determination of Rana perezi based on annual rings in phalanges. Amphibia-Reptilia 11:193196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, J. A. 1981. Histological and histochemical methods: theory and practice. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kvalseth, T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R2 American Statistician 39: 279285.Google Scholar
Morales-Nin, B. 1992. Determination del crecimiento de peces óseos en base a la microestructura de los otolotis. Technical report, food and agriculture organization, no. 322.Google Scholar
Patón, D., Juarranz, A., Sequeros, E., Pérez-Campo, R., López-Torres, M. and Barja, G. 1991. Seasonal age and sex structure of Rana perezi assessed by skeletochronology. Journal of Herpetology 25: 389394.Google Scholar
Pereiro, J. A. 1982. Modelos al uso en dinámica de poblaciones marinas sometidas a explotación. Information Tecnica Instituto Espagnol Oceanografico 1.Google Scholar