Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:05:00.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative digestibility experiments with growing pigs and adult sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Fernández ,
H. Jørgensen  and
A. Just
J. A. Fernández
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Copenhagen V, Denmark
H. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Copenhagen V, Denmark
A. Just
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Science, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

The digestive ability of growing pigs and large adult sows was compared in digestibility experiments with 26 foodstuffs and diets. In all cases, the sows showed superior digestibility of nutrients. On average, the sows digested 150 g more crude protein, 100 g more crude fat, 300 g more crude fibre per kg diet and proportionately 0·09 more gross energy than the young animals. The superior ability of the sows to digest gross energy was negatively correlated with the soluble carbohydrate and gross energy concentration of the food. A close linear relationship between digestibility in growing pigs and that in sows was found, making it possible to apply digestibility data for growing pigs in practical diet formulation for sows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , August 1986 , pp. 127 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Breirem, K., Husby, M. and Presthegge, K. 1943. Cellulose som for til svin. Norges Lantbrukshøiskoks Beretning fra Fóringsforsøkene No. 55, pp. 1–82.Google Scholar
Christensen, K. D. 1980. Bestemmelse af Ietop 10 selige og lethydrolyserbare kulhydrater (LHK). Ugeskrift for Jordbrug 12: 340.Google Scholar
Close, W. H., Berschauer, F. and Heavens, R. P. 1983. The influence of protein: energy value of the ration and level of feed intake on the energy and nitrogen metabolism of the growing pig. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cranwell, P. D. 1968. Microbial fermentation in the alimentary tract of the pig. Nutrition Abstract and Reviews 38: 721–730.Google ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, H. M., Friend, D. W. and Nicholson, J. W. G. 1962. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 42: 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, P. E. and Weidner, K. 1973. Chemistry of Feedstuffs and Animals, Compendium 1, pp. 14–55. Veterinary Faculty for FAO Fellows, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Jongbloed, A. W. and Smits, B. 1984. De voederwaarde van ingekuilde Corn Cob Mix en snijmaissilage voor varkens. Bedrijfsontwikkeling Jaargang 15: (9), 723–726.Google Scholar
Just, A. 1978. The influence of processing on the nutritive value of cereals for pigs. 29th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Just, A. 1982a. The influence of crude fibre from cereals on the net energy value of diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 9: 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A. 1982b. The influence of ground barley straw on the net energy value of diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 9: 717–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A. 1983. The role of the large intestine in the digestion of nutrients and amino acid utilization in monogastrics. 4th International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 289–309. Les Colloques de l'INRA, 16.Google Scholar
Just, A., Fernández, J. A. and Jørgensen, H. 1983a. The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients. Livestock Production Science 10: 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A., Jørgensen, H. and Fernandez, J. A. 1981. The digestive capacity of caecum-colon and the value of the nitrogen absorbed from the hind gut for protein synthesis in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 46: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, A., Jørgensen, H. and Fernandez, J. A. 1983b. Maintenance requirement and the net energy value of different diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 10: 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, Maria L., Van Soest, P. J., Pond, W. G., Lewis, Bertha and McDowell, R. E. 1980. Utilization of dietary fiber from alfalfa by growing swine. I. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 50: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. 1981. Associative effects of feeds on digestive efficiency in the small intestine of pigs. Animal Production 32: 396 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Madsen, A. 1963. [Digestibility experiments with pigs.] Beretning fra Forsøgslaboratoriet, No. 337. pp. 191.Google Scholar
Mason, V. C. and Just, A. 1976. Bacterial activity in the hind gut of pigs. 1. Its influence on the apparent digestibility of dietary energy and fat. Zeitschrift fiir Tierphysiologie, Tierernahrung und Fultermittelkunde 36: 301–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, H. E. 1962. Avlens og fodringens indflydelse pa tarmkanalens udvikling hos svinet. Ugeskrift for Landmcend 107: (16), 235–240.Google Scholar
Nordfeldt, S. 1946. The ability of broad sows to digest the feed as compared to that of young pigs. Annales of the Royal Agricultural College of Sweden. 13: 136–152.Google Scholar
Peers, D. G., Taylor, A. G. and Whittemore, C. T. 1977. The influence of feeding level and level of dietary inclusion on the digestibility of barley meal in the pig. Animal Feedstuffs Science and Technology 2: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, F. X. and Kirchgessner, M. 1984. [Digestibility of energy and crude nutrients in pigs in relation to feeding plane and live weight.] Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 51: 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundgren, Margareta. 1983. Helgrödesensilage avärter till Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Konsulentavdokument rapporter Allmänt 44.Google Scholar
Wenk, C. 1981. Digestion of feedstuffs: Practical application for the ration formulation. 32nd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Zagreb.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, Teresa. 1973. Digestion and absorption of nitrogenous compounds in the large intestine of pigs. Rocznik nauk rolniczych B95: 85–90.Google Scholar