Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:52:26.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catch-up growth in pigs: a relationship with muscle cellularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. E. Handel  and
N. C. Stickland
S. E. Handel
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU
N. C. Stickland
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU
Get access

Abstract

An investigation was made into a possible relationship between the relative growth potential and skeletal muscle fibre number in low birth weight Large White pigs and their heaviest birth-weight littermates. Estimates of the total fibre number of m. semitendinosus were made from 23 pairs of ‘small’ and ‘large’ littermates. Littermates were slaughtered at the same age and were of a mean live weight 86 (s.d. 15) kg. Small littermates (mean birth weight 939 (s.d. 164) g) had, on average, lower live weights at slaughter (P < 0·001) and lower muscle fibre numbers (P < 0·05) than their large littermates (mean birth weight 2085 (s.d. 343) g). However, pigs within the low birth-weight category exhibited various degrees of catch-up growth with their heaviest littermates and some individuals actually exceeded their large littermates in live weight at slaughter. The relative live weights at slaughter and relative muscle fibre numbers of small and large littermates were determined by expressing the value for the small littermate as a proportion of the corresponding value for its large littermate. No correlation existed between relative live weight at slaughter and relative muscle fibre number of small and large littermates. The small littermates were then divided into two groups by their mean value of relative small to large slaughter weight (0·84). The littermates of low relative slaughter weight (≤0·84) exhibited a large range of muscle fibre numbers although their mean fibre numbers were lower than their large littermates (P < 0·05). This large range was probably responsible for the lack of correlation mentioned above. Those small littermates which exhibited a good degree of catch-up growth (relative slaughter weight >0·84) possessed fibre numbers which were not significantly different from those of their large littermates. These results suggest that pigs which exhibit an appreciable degree of catch-up growth always contain high relative numbers of fibres in their muscles. Those which show a poor degree of catch-up growth (≤O·84) exhibit a range of fibre numbers because there may be environmental and other factors which prevent some pigs from realizing their full growth potential. The results of the present study advocate muscle fibre number as an indicator at birth of potential for post-natal growth performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 291 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

England, D. C. 1974. Husbandry components in prenatal and perinatal development in swine. Journal of Animal Science 38: 1045–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, H. M. 1976. The effect of freezing on the transverse sectional area of a muscle. Histochemical Journal 8: 651–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guth, I. and Samaha, F. J. 1970. Research note: procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase. Experimental Neurology 28: 365–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handel, S. E. 1984. Effects of low birthweight on postnatal development of skeletal muscle in the pig. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Handel, S. E. and Stickland, N. C. 1984. Muscle cellularity and its relationship with birth weight. Journal of Anatomy 139: 726 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hartsock, T. G. and Graves, H. B. 1970. Ontogeny of the nursing order in newborn pigs. Journal of Animal Science 31: 174 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Winfield, C. G. and Mullaney, P. D. 1976. Within-litter variation in the performance of piglets to three weeks of age. Animal Production 22: 351–357.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. and McDonald, I. 1959. The relative influence of birth weight, milk consumption and supplementary food consumption upon the growth rates of suckling pigs. Animal Production 1: 139–144.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. 1968. Practical implications of some genetic and environmental influences on growth and development in pigs. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 466–497. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Powell, S. E. and Aberle, E. D. 1980. Effects of birth weight on growth and carcass composition of swine. Journal of Animal Science, 50: 860–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, S. E. and Aberle, E. D. 1981. Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue cellularity in runt and normal birth weight swine. Journal of Animal Science 52: 748–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stickland, N. C. 1973. The growth and development of skeletal muscles in pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hull.Google Scholar
Stickland, N. C. and Goldspink, G. 1973. A possible indicator muscle for the fibre content and growth characteristics of porcine muscle. Animal Production 16: 135–146.Google Scholar
Wigmore, P. M. C. and Stickland, N. C. 1983. Muscle development in large and small pig foetuses. Journal of Anatomy 137: 235–245.Google Scholar