Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:36:41.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carcass and meat quality of ram and ewe lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. W. Butler-Hogg ,
M. A. Francombe  and
E. Dransfield
B. W. Butler-Hogg
Affiliation:
Animal Physiology Division and Food Quality Division, AFRC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
M. A. Francombe
Affiliation:
Animal Physiology Division and Food Quality Division, AFRC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
E. Dransfield
Affiliation:
Animal Physiology Division and Food Quality Division, AFRC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

Carcass composition and quality and eating quality of the m. longissimus dorsi (LD) were compared in 15 entire male (ram) and 15 female (ewe) pure bred Dorset Down lambs (carcass weight range 12 to 23 kg).

Rams grew 28 g/day faster than ewes, taking on average 2 weeks less to achieve 35 kg live weight. At the mean carcass weight of 16-8 kg, ram carcasses contained more lean (42 g/kg carcass weight) and bone (19 g/kg) and less fat (subcutaneous, 33 g/kg; intermuscular, 28 g/kg; perirenal-retroperitoneal, 14 g/kg) than ewe carcasses.

At the same level of fat cover in the commercially prepared side, ewe carcasses required more trimming of subcutaneous fat than rams. However, there was more intermuscular fat (which is not removed by conventional cutting) in the ewes; consequently their saleable meat contained 51 g/kg more fat and 37 g/kg less lean than that from rams.

The roast LD was invariably tender and the eating quality of LD from rams was as desirable as that from ewes, while overall eating quality compared favourably with that of animals studied previously. There was no evidence of an undesirable sexual odour or flavour in ram meat.

With early maturing breeds, which can be finished off grass, non-castration of entire males offers the opportunity of improving the efficiency of lean meat production whilst retaining good carcass and eating quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 107 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1979. Sheep carcass evaluation — measurements of composition using a standardised butchery method. Memo. Meat Res. Inst. No. 38.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1981. Beef carcass evaluation — measurement of composition using anatomical dissection. Memo. Meat Res. Inst. No. 47.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. 1982. Fat partitioning in Clun and Southdown lambs. Anim. Prod. 34: 377 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
De boer, H., Dumont, B. L., Pomeroy, R. W. and Weniger, J. H. 1974. Manual on E.A.A.P. reference methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1: 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dransfield, E., Nute, G. R., MacDougall, D. B. and Rhodes, D. N. 1979. Effect of sire breed on eating quality of cross-bred lambs. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 30: 305–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. L. and Park, R. J. 1980. Odours and flavours in meat. In Developments in Meat Science—1 (ed. Lawrie, R. A.), pp. 219–248. Applied Sci. Publ., London.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D., Kirton, A. H. and Jury, K. E. 1970. Growth and development of sheep II. Effect of breed and sex on the growth and carcass composition of the Southdown and Romney and their cross. N.Z. Jl. agric. Res. 13: 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. 1979. Variation in the carcass characteristics of commercial British sheep with particular reference to overfatness. Meat Sci. 3: 199–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D. and Jones, D. W. 1981. Value of conformation as an indicator of sheep carcass composition within and between breeds. Anim. Prod. 33: 39–49.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Cuthbertson, A. 1977. A survey of the carcass characteristics of the main types of British lamb. Anim. Prod. 25: 165–179.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Clarke, J. N. and Hickey, S. M. 1982. A comparison of the composition and carcass quality of ram, Kelly castrate, Russian castrate, wether and ewe lambs. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 42: 117–118.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Winger, R. J., Dobbie, J. L. and Duganzich, D. M. 1983. Palatability of meat from electrically stimulated carcasses of yearling and older entire-male and female sheep. J. Fd Technol. 18: 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, D. N. 1969. The quality of meat from male and non-male animals. In Meat Production from Entire Male Animals (ed. Rhodes, D. N.), pp. 189–198. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Walker, D. E. 1950. The influence of sex upon carcass quality of New Zealand fat lamb. N.Z. Jl. Sci. Technol. 32: 30–38.Google Scholar
Wolf, B. T. 1982. An analysis of the variation in the lean tissue distribution of sheep. Anim. Prod. 34: 257–264.Google Scholar
Wolf, B. T., Smith, C. and Sales, D. I. 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Anim. Prod. 31: 307–313.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., MacFie, H. J. H., Pomeroy, R. W. and Twinn, D. J. 1980. Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of type of breed and stage of maturity. Anim. Prod. 30: 135–152.Google Scholar