Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:45:57.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can information about solid food be transmitted from one piglet to another?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C.A. Morgan ,
A.B. Lawrence ,
J. Chirnside  and
L.A. Deans
A.B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland.
J. Chirnside
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland.
L.A. Deans
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, SAC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland.
Get access

Abstract

When weaned early, piglets commonly take some time to accept solid food, resulting in a growth check and reduced welfare. The transmission of information about food between animals has been demonstrated in other species and it would be advantageous if this occurred in piglets. This experiment investigated the effects of pairing piglets that were consuming solid food with newly weaned piglets. Six litters of piglets did not receive solid food until weaning. In each litter four piglets (3 plus 1 spare) were weaned at 21 days of age and housed together for 7 days and offered one of two foods (3 litters per food). At 28 days of age the remaining piglets were weaned and four pairs of piglets were formed, such that there were three experienced animals paired with three inexperienced observers, each pair having visual contact and varying degrees of physical contact (1: none, 2: through wire mesh, 3: housed together), and a pair of inexperienced piglets (4: housed together) to act as controls. Food intake and weight gain were recorded over a period of 7 days. There was no effect of food type on food intake or live-weight gain of the pairs but the inexperienced pigs had higher gains on food 1 than food 2. The inexperienced pairs ate less food than the other pairs and the experienced/observer pairs that were housed together had the greatest weight gain. The level of variation between piglets was such that there were no significant effects of pairing treatment on the weight gain of the inexperienced animals. Total time spent feeding increased with time from pair formation. The number of simultaneous feeding events was higher for the experienced/observer pairs housed together than for the inexperienced pairs. This experiment has indicated that food intake is stimulated when an inexperienced piglet is housed with an experienced piglet and, with further work, this could be exploited to alleviate the weaning check.

Keywords

food intakelearningpigssocial environmentweaning.
Type
Non-ruminant, nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , December 2001 , pp. 471 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boe, K. and Jensen, P. 1995. Individual differences in suckling and solid food intake by piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 183–192.Google Scholar
Ewbank, R. and Meese, G. B. 1971. Aggressive behaviour in groups of domesticated pigs on removal and return of individuals. Animal Production 13: 685–693.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R. 1980. The nutrition of weaner pigs. Pig News and Information 1: 11–15.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1984. The role of behavior in swine production: a review of research. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 317–339.Google Scholar
Galef, B. G. 1993. Functions of social learning about food: a causal analysis of effects of diet novelty on preference transmission. Animal Behaviour 46: 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B. G. 1994. Olfactory communications about foods among rats: a review of recent findings. In Behavioural aspects of feeding (ed. Galef, B.G., Mainardi, M. and Valsecchi, P.), pp. 83–101. Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Held, S., Mendl, M., Devereux, C. and Byrne, R. W. 2000. Social tactics of pigs in a competitive foraging task: the ‘informed forager’ paradigm. Animal Behaviour 59: 569–576.Google Scholar
Keeling, L. J. and Hurnik, J. F. 1996. Social facilitation and synchronization of eating between familiar and unfamiliar newly weaned piglets. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 46: 54–60.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. 1993. Measuring behaviour — an introductory guide, second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. 1995. The social transmission of behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. and Pope, S. J. 1994. Social learning in sibling pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. and Pope, S. J. 1999. The effects of demonstrator social status and prior foraging success on social learning in laying hens. Animal Behaviour 57: 163–171.Google Scholar
Pajor, E. A., Fraser, D. and Kramer, D. L. 1991. Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 139–155.Google Scholar
Provenza, F. D. and Balph, D. F. 1987. Diet learning by domestic ruminants: theory, evidence and practical implications. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 211–232.Google Scholar
Spoolder, H. A. M., Burbidge, J. A., Edwards, S. A., Lawrence, A. B. and Simmins, P. H. 1996. Social recognition in gilts mixed into a dynamic group of 30 sows. Animal Science 62: 630 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Zentall, T. R. 1996. An analysis of imitative learning in animals. In Social learning in animals: the roots of culture (ed. Heyes, C. M. and Galef, B. G.), pp. 221–243. Academic Press Limited, London.Google Scholar