Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:06:39.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed structure and genetic analysis of Border Leicester sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1962

G. B. Young  and
A. F. Purser
G. B. Young
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9
A. F. Purser
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9
Get access

Extract

Since the year 1900 the number of Border Leicesters has been fairly stable, between 3,000 and 5,000 females being registered each year. The number of flocks, however, has shown a fairly steady increase from 200 to over 600. There has been a decline in the number of ewes registered per flock from 16 to about 6 to 8. The important flocks would seem to number 15 to 20; only a few flocks persist for any appreciable length of time. Generation intervals are short, being only about 2 years on the sire side and 3½ years on the female side.

As with other breeds, relatively few rams have an importance out of proportion to their numbers—14 rams and 2 ewes with direct coefficients of relationship greater than 5% were found. Inbreeding per generation was only 0·32%, and there was no evidence of strain effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , October 1962 , pp. 379 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, D., 1881. The Border Leicester breed of sheep. Trans. High, andagric. Soc. Scotl., 13: 262.Google Scholar
Carter, R. C., 1940. A genetic history of Hampshire sheep. J. Hered., 31: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., & Lush, J. L., 1933. Inbreeding and genetic history of the Rambouillet sheep in America. J. Hered., 24: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P., & El Itriby, A. A., 1945. Herd size and its genetical significance in pedigree cattle breeding. J. agric. Sci., 35: 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A., & Stamp, J. T., 1957. Sheep Husbandry and Diseases. Crosby Lockwood & Son Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L., & Anderson, A. L., 1939. A genetic history of Poland China swine. J. Hered., 30: 219.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L., 1946. Chance as a cause of changes in gene frequency within pure breeds of livestock. Amer. Nat., 80: 318.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, J., 1909. In Stephens' Book of the Farm, Vol. 3. William Blackwood & Sons, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Mcphee, H., & Wright, S., 1925. Mendelian analysis of the pure breeds of livestock. III. The Shorthorns. J. Hered., 16: 205.Google Scholar
Pawson, H. C., 1957. Robert Bakewell. Crosby Lockwood & Son Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., 1953. A numerical description of breed structure. J. agric. Sci., 43: 334.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., & Asker, A. A., 1951. The genetic history and breed structure of British Friesian Cattle. Emp. J. exp. Agric, 19: 113.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., 1961. Population dynamics in fourteen lowland breeds of sheep in Great Britain. J. agric. Sci., 57: 21.Google Scholar
Wood, J., 1921. The Border Leicester breed. Scot. J. Agric, 4: 407.Google Scholar
Wright, S., & McPhee, H. C., 1925. An approximate method of calculating coefficients of inbreeding and relationship from livestock pedigrees. J. agric. Res., 31: 377.Google Scholar
Youatt, W. M., 1869. Sheep, their Breeds, Management and Diseases. Simpkin, Marshall & Co., London.Google Scholar
Young, W., 1950. Border Leicesters in south west Scotland. Scot. Agric, 30: 18.Google Scholar