Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T16:58:07.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats 2. Body components at slaughter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. L. Thonney ,
St C. S. Taylor ,
J. I. Murray  and
T. H. McClelland
M. L. Thonney
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
St C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. I. Murray
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
T. H. McClelland
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research§, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

Animals from Soay, Welsh Mountain, Southdown, Finnish Landrace, Jacob, Wiltshire Horn and Oxford Down sheep breeds and a breed of feral goats were slaughtered when 0·40, 0·52, 0·64 or 0·76 of mature body weight. The effects of stage of maturity, breed and sex were examined in the following traits: gut content as a proportion of slaughter weight; blood, omental plus mesenteric fat, perirenal fat, alimentary tract, ‘remainder’ of non-carcass parts and hot carcass, each as a proportion of fleece-free empty body weight; also shoulder, rib, loin and gigot joints and their commercially higher-valued (prime) and lower-valued cuts, each as a proportion of carcass weight.

As a proportion, gut content declined as animals matured, as also did blood, alimentary tract, ‘remainder’, prime shoulder, shank and prime gigot. Increasing proportions were internal fat depots, the hot carcass, rib, loin and gigot flank. Males accumulated significantly less internal fat and more shoulder than females.

When equally mature in live weight, males had proportions that were significantly lower for perirenal fat, rib and gigot and higher for shoulder and pelt plus head, feet and organs.

There were significant inter-breed regressions on mature body weight. The proportion of blood, alimentary tract, pelt plus head, feet and organs, and prime gigot declined with breed size, while hot carcass, brisket, rib and loin proportions increased. These regressions were attributed to a non-random sample of breeds. The small Soay breed had proportions of internal fat and hot carcass which were well below average, and higher proportions of blood, alimentary tract and ‘remainder’. Soay sheep also had a higher proportion of commercially higher-valued cuts in the carcass. In contrast, the large Oxford Down breed had low proportions of non-carcass components (except alimentary tract) and high proportions of lower-priced cuts and prime rib. Feral goats had a greater, and Southdown sheep a smaller, proportion of gut content than other breeds.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 261 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broad, T. E., Davies, A. S. and Tan, G. Y. 1980. Pre- and postnatal study of the carcass growth of sheep. 1. Growth of dissectable fat and its chemical components. Animal Production 31: 63–71.Google Scholar
Butterfleld, R. M., Griffiths, D. A., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and James, A. M. 1983a. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 1. Muscle, bone and fat. Animal Production 36: 29–37.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Thompson, J. M. 1983. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 4. Fat depots and bones. Animal Production 37: 423–431.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Thompson, J. M. and Reddacliff, K. J. 1985. Changes in body composition relaive to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 3. Fat partitioning. Animal Production 40: 129–134.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Zamora, J., James, A. M., Thompson, J. M. and Reddacliff, K. J. 1983b. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 3. Body organs. Animal Production 36: 461–470.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Zamora, J., James, A. M., Thompson, J. M. and Williams, J. 1983c. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino Rams. 2. Individual muscles and muscle groups. Animal Production 36: 165–174.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Zamora, J., Thompson, J. M., Reddacliff, K. J. and Griffiths, D. A. 1984. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Hor n rams and wethers. 1. Carcass muscle, fat and bone and body organs. Animal Production 39: 251–258.Google Scholar
Croston, D., Kempster, A. J., Guy, D. R. and Jones, D. W. 1987. Carcass composition of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds compared at the same carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Animal Production 44: 99–106.Google Scholar
Demment, M. W. and Van Soest, P. J. 1985. A nutritional explanation for body size patterns of ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125: 641–672.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D., Kirton, A. H. and Jury, K. E. 1970. Growth and development of sheep. II. Effect of breed and sex on the growth and carcass composition of the Southdown and Romney and their cross. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 13: 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenty, K. G., Clarke, J. N. and Jury, K. E. 1979. Carcass growth and development of Romney, Corriedale, Dorset and crossbred sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Jackson, T. H. 1967. The procedure for evaluating carcasses for growth studies. Edinburgh School of Agriculture. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Jackson, T. H. 1969. Relative weight changes in the tissues of the gigot joint as Scottish Blackface castrated male lambs develop from weaning to maturity and an analysis of the observed individual variation. Animal Production 11: 409–417.Google Scholar
Jury, K. E., Fourie, P. D. and Kirton, A. H. 1977. Growth and development of sheep. IV. Growth of the musculature. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Southgate, J. R. 1982. A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds in 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 2. Carcass characteristics, and rate and efficiency of meat gain. Animal Production 34: 167–178.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D., Guy, D. R. and Jones, D. W. 1987a. Growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds, compared at the same estimated carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Animal Production 44: 83–98.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D. and Jones, D. W. 1987b. Tissue growth and development in crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds. Livestock Production Science. In press.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbhrtson, A. and Harrington, G. 1976. Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. Animal Production 23: 25–34.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Dalton, D. C. and Ackerley, L. R. 1974. Performance of sheep on New Zealand hill country. II. Growth and composition of wethers of five breeds at three ages. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 17: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Fourie, P. D. and Jury, K. E. 1972. Growth and development of sheep. III. Growth of the carcass and non-carcass components of the Southdown and Romney and their cross and some relationships with composition. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15: 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luitingh, H. C. 1962. Developmental changes in beef steers as influenced by fattening, age and type of ration. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
Russel, A. F. J., Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1968. Components of weight loss in pregnant hill ewes during winter. Animal Production 10: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1983. The dependence of lean carcass composition on carcass fat, as assessed by multivariate shape/size methods. Animal Production 37: 321–327.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. and Tulloh, N. M. 1968. Developmental growth and body-weight loss in cattle. II. Dissected components of the commercially dressed and jointed carcass. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 477–495.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980. Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth. Animal Production 30: 161–165.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Mason, M. A. and McClelland, T. H. 1980. Breed and sex differences in muscle distribution in equally mature sheep. Animal Production 30: 125–133.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L. and Ross, D. A. 1987. Composition of gain of rats grown at controlled rates from 80 to 205 grams. Journal of Nutrition. In press.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S. and McClelland, T. H. 1987. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 1. Growth and food intake. Animal Production 45: 239–260.Google Scholar
Wolf, B. T. 1982. An analysis of the variation in the lean tissue distribution of sheep. Animal Production 34: 257–264.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., MacFie, H. J. H., Pomeroy, R. W. and Twinn, D. J. 1980. Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of type of breed and stage of maturity. Animal Production 30: 135–152.Google Scholar