Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:03:36.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body composition of British and zebu × British cattle in northern Australia 1. Breed and growth rate effects on yield of carcass, dressed carcass composition and offal composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. M. Seebeck
R. M. Seebeck
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Tropical Animal Acience, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, Box 5545, Rockhampton 4702, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Comparative slaughter was used to assess the body composition of Shorthorn-Hereford (SH), Africander cross (A×), Brahman cross (B×), and late castrated Brahman cross (B×(late)) steers of the F, generation with respect to their yield of carcass, gross carcass composition and offal composition. Animals were slaughtered at pre-determined weights of 315, 355, 399, 449 and 505 kg.

The B× animals had the highest carcass yield (expressed either as dressed carcass weight at the same fasted body weight or at the same empty body weight), while the A×, B×(late) and SH animals had similar carcass yield. Within a breed, rate of growth affected carcass yield, with faster growing animals having the lower carcass yield, particularly with respect to fasted body weight.

The breeds were different in carcass composition but this was dependent on both size and growth rate. Brahman cross animals had a lower proportion of bone than A× and SH animals, particularly at the higher body weights. Faster growing animals tended to contain more muscle and bone and less fat, with the exception of the SH animals.

The breeds were also significantly different in the composition of the offal components. A× were notable for high head weights and low tail weights, B× having high blood weights and low total gut tissue weights, and Bx(late) having high hide weights and low abdominal fat weights.

Rate of growth had some effect on offal composition, the general trend being that the faster growing animals were characterized by a lower proportion of heart, blood and pancreas. However there was also evidence that the rate of growth differentially affected the offal composition with respect to breeds. This effect mainly arose because the faster growing B×(late) animals had lower weights of abdominal fat. Within the other breeds, the opposite trend was observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 177 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, M. A. 1978. The analysis of unbalanced cross-classifications. Jl R. Statist. Soc. A141: 195–223.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriussen, T. 1978. Growth of bovine tissues. 1. Genetic influences on growth patterns of muscle, fat and bone in young bulls. Anim. Prod. 26: 245–258.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1974. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 10: 211–218.Google Scholar
Black, W. H., Semple, A. T. and Lush, J. L. 1934. Beef production and quality as influenced by crossing Brahman with Hereford and Shorthorn cattle. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric, No. 417.Google Scholar
Bremner, K. C. 1961. A study of pathogenetic factors in experimental bovine oesophagostomosis. 1. An assessment of the importance of anorexia. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 498–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, O. D., Reddish, R. L., King, G. T. and Simms, R. L. 1956. Factors contributing to the difference in dressing percentage between Hereford and Brahman × Hereford steers. J. Anim. Sci. 15: 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and May, N. D. S. 1964. Muscles of the Ox. University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Deland, M. P. B. 1979. Beef production from progeny of Hereford cows mated to Hereford, Charolais and Brahman sires. Agric. Rec. 6: (11), 11–13.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1941. On the distribution of a variate whose logarithm is normally distributed. Jl. R. statist. Soc. Suppl. 7: pp. 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, J. E. and Vercoe, J. E. 1977. Food intake, eating rate, weight gains, metabolic rate and efficiency of feed utilization in Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Anim. Prod. 25: 343–358.Google Scholar
Hewetson, R. W. 1962. Dressing percentages of Brahman and Africander cross and of British breed steers. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 2: 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiley, R. B. 1959. Zebu cross cattle for Northern Australia. Bull. Court. Sci. Ind. Res. (Aust.), No. 172.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. and Chirchir, G. I. K. 1971. A study of the growth rate of F2 and F3 Africander cross, Brahman cross and British cross cattle from birth to 18 months in a tropical environment. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 11: 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. and Turner, H. G. 1959. A project on genetics of adaptation in cattle. Divisional Rep., CSIRO Division of Animal Health and Production (series S.W.-3) No. 8.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. 1982. Ruminal and intestinal digestion in Brahman crossbred and Hereford cattle fed alfalfa or tropical pasture hay. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 1190–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, T. H. 1968. Developmental changes in beef cattle. Agric. Res. (S. Afr. Dep. Agric. Technical Service Rep.), Part 1, pp. 249–253.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and TAYLOR, ST C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M., Tulloh, N. M. and Winter, W. H. 1977. The effect of three different growth rates on some offal components of cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. and Brody, S. 1950. Milk production and feed and water consumption responses of Brahman, Jersey and Holstein cows to changes in temperature, 50°F to 105°F and 50°F to 8°F. Res. Bull. Miss, agric. Exp. Stn, No. 460.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. and Brody, S. 1951. Influence of increasing temperature, 40°F to 105°F on milk production in Brown Swiss cows, and on feed and water consumption and body weight in Brown Swiss and Brahman cows and heifers. Res. Bull. Miss, agric. Exp. Stn, No. 471.Google Scholar
Ramsey, C. B., Cole, J. W., Terrell, R. N. and Temple, R. S. 1965. Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, palatability and composition. IV. Yield of gastrointestinal tract and other non-carcass components. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Paver, H. and Wilson, J. C. 1970. Effect of castration and dietary protein level on growth and carcass composition in beef cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. McC. and Donnelly, J. B. 1982. The effect of plane of nutrition on the body composition of two breeds of weaner sheep fed a high protein diet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 98: 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1967. Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. I. Experimental design, body weight growth, and the effects of developmental growth and body weight loss on the dressed carcass and the offal. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18: 1015–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1968. Developmental studies of body composition. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 36: 167–181.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1973a. Sources of variation in the fertility of a herd of zebu, British, and zebu × British cattle in Northern Australia. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81: 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1973b. The effect of body-weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers. I. Empty body weight, dressed carcass weight and offal components. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1973C. The effect of body-weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers. II. Dissected components of the dressed carcass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1983. Factors affecting patterns of development and their assessment. Anim. Prod. 37: 53–65.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1984. SYSNOVA Version 9 Reference Manual. Tech. Pap. Animal Research Laboratories, CSIRO, Canberra. In press.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M., Springell, P. H. and O'kelly, J. C. 1971. Alterations in host metabolism by the specific and anorectic effects of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus). I. Food intake and body weight growth. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 24: 373–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. M. and Barlow, R. 1981. Growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred and straightbred Hereford steers. II. Carcass measurements and composition. Aust. J. agric. Res. 32: 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. 1975. Breeding of beef cattle for tropical Australia. A.M.R.C. Review 24: 1–30.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. and Short, A. J. 1972. Effects of field infestations of gastrointestinal helminths and of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on growth of three breeds of cattle. Aust. J. agric. Res. 23: 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar