Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:40:17.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birthcoat shedding in Wiltshire horn lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Slee
J. Slee
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Summary

Observations on 160 Wiltshire lambs showed that shedding of the birth-coat occurred as a seasonal (normally May–July) phenomenon between the ages of 2 and 5 months. Denudation was usually considerable but not always complete. The average extent of denudation in 3 successive lamb crops was 89 %, 74 % and 92 %. Shedding usually spread progressively across the body according to a consistent, bilaterally symmetrical pattern.

Shedding did not appear to be influenced by the sex of the lamb, birthcoat type (hairy or smooth), or by follicle density, ratio of secondary: primary follicles, or fibre diameter. However, a number of different causes of variation in shedding behaviour were found.

1. Lambs born at different times tended to synchronise in onset of shedding so that they were more alike in the dates when they shed than in the ages at which they did so. Very early and very late-born lambs showed least effective synchronisation. Early lambs were older but still earlier than normal in commencing to shed; late lambs shed when younger than normal and in an atypical fashion. It was concluded that the age of the lamb, and an unknown environmental stimulus both interacted to influence shedding.

2. There was a positive association between rate of gain in live-weight and earliness of shedding. Differences in level of nutrition seemed associated with differences in rate of shedding between individual lambs and also with overall differences in the average rates of shedding between years.

3. Genetic variation in shedding was suggested by twins being more alike than half-sibs in some aspects of shedding, particularly when differences in level of nutrition were discounted.

4. In Wiltshire foetuses the order and pattern of development of embryonic follicles in different body areas resembled closely the sequence and pattern of subsequent birthcoat shedding. A causal connection was postulated.

In discussion it was suggested that there was a seasonally fluctuating environmental factor (possibly daylength), which was capable of reacting upon the Wiltshire lamb between the months of March and July. A hypothesis was developed to explain how such a stimulus could react upon the pelage follicles to produce the observed patterns of birthcoat shedding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1963 , pp. 301 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carter, H. B., & Clarke, W. H., 1957. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of Australian Merino sheep. Austr. J. agric. Res., 8: 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D. S., 1955. The photoperiodic and hormone responses of wool growth in sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., 15: 57.Google Scholar
Lyne, A. G., 1961. The postnatal development of wool follicles, shedding and skin thickness in inbred Merino and Southdown-Merino crossbred sheep. Austr. J. biol. Sci., 14: 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, L. R., 1961. Photoperiodicity of seasonal rhythm of wool growth in sheep. Nature (Lond.), 190: 102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rougeot, J., 1957. Action de la variation saisonniere de la durée quotidienne d'éclairement sur la mue de certaines fibres de la toison de la race ovine Limousine. C.R. Soc. Biol.,(Paris), 151: 834.Google Scholar
Rougeot, J., 1961. Actions comparées des variations périodiques, annuelles et semestrielles, de la duree quotidienne de l'éclairement sur les cycles des follicules des jarres courts de la toison des brebis limousines. Relations avec leur cycle de reproduction. Ann. Biol. anim. Biochem. Biophys., 1: 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L., 1956. Observations of nutritional and seasonal changes in the fleeces of some Masham sheep. J. agric. Sci., 47: 129.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L., 1960. A study of the coat of the Mouflon Ovis Musimon with special reference to seasonal change. Proc. Zool. Soc. (Lond.), 135: 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L., 1962. Preliminary observations on seasonal changes in the fleeces of unshorn Merino sheep. Proc. Austr. Soc. Anim. Prod., 4: 46.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L., 1962. Why do animals moult? New Scientist, 13: 266.Google Scholar
Slee, J., 1959. Fleece shedding, staple length and fleece weight in experimental Wiltshire Horn–Scottish Blackface sheep crosses. J. agric. Sci., 53: 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J., 1962. Developmental morphology of the skin and the hair follicles in normal and in ‘Ragged’ mice. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 10: 507.Google ScholarPubMed
Slee, J., & Carter, H. B., 1961. A comparative study of fleece growth in Tasmanian fine Merino and Wiltshire Horn ewes. J. agric. Sci., 57: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J., & Carter, H. B., 1962. Fibre shedding and fibre-follicle relationships in the fleeces of Wiltshire Horn–Scottish Blackface sheep crosses. J. agric. Sci., 58: 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, A. B., 1957. Photo-periodicity and wool growth in Romney rams and wethers. Nature (Lond.), 180: 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar