Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:23:22.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The association between commercial cut-out yield and gross chemical composition in market pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. Doornenbal  and
A. H. Martin
A. H. Martin
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture, Research Branch, Lacombe, Alberta
Get access

Extract

In a study of 100 pig carcasses, representing a sample of the pigs used in previously reported work, gross chemical composition of the ham, shoulder, loin, belly and half carcass were determined for one side. Percentage yield (trimmed v. untrimmed) of picnic, butt, ham and loin (PBHL), and certain carcass measurements were recorded on the other side of the carcass. From the covariance analyses, it was concluded that backfat thickness of the carcass alone was of only moderate predictive value for total chemical carcass fat.

Carcass protein could, for most purposes, be predicted with satisfactory precision from the percentages of protein in the loin or in the ham, with residual standard deviations of 0·27 and 0·36% respectively.

Although percentage yield of lean cuts may be considered satisfactory for commercial evaluation of swine carcasses, it was not an accurate index of the true leanness of a carcass expressed as the percentage of chemically determined protein.

Multiple regression equations were computed for predicting the percentage of protein in the carcass and percentage yield of PBHL from conventional carcass measurements. The residual standard deviations for predicting the percentage of protein were 0·49 for the males and 0·42 for the females; for percentage yield of PBHL these were 1·31 and 1·22 respectively. Total backfat thickness was the most important single variable in predictions. Variances among sexes were non-homogeneous for the important traits, with the females in all cases showing the greater variability. The results of regression analysis within sex indicated that, for maximum precision, a separate prediction equation for each sex was required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1966 , pp. 445 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E., & Bray, R. W., 1964. Physical and chemical lipid determinations in barrow and gilt carcasses. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 656–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, S. F., Harrington, G., & Johnson, R. F., 1962. The prediction of lean percentage of pigs of bacon weight from carcass measurements. Anim. Prod., 4: 25–36.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H., 1948. Comparative studies of meat. II. The changes in the carcass during growth and fattening, and their relation to the chemical composition of the fatty and muscular tissues. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 38: 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Z. L., Bray, R. W., Briskey, K. J., & Traeder, D. H., 1961. Intramuscular fat distribution in the longissimus dorsi of paired pork loins. J. Anim. Sci., 20: 603–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, R. A., Kemp, J. D., & Varney, W. Y., 1963. Indices for lamb carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredeen, H. T., Berg, R. T., Bowland, J. P., & Doornenbal, H., 1964. Prediction of yield and value of hog carcasses. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnaedinger, R. H., Pearson, A. M., Reinere, E. P., & Mix, V. M., 1963. Body composition of market weight pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, W. E., Bratzler, L. J., & Luecke, R. W., 1963. Physical and chemical relationships of pork carcasses. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 613–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., & Barton, R. A., 1958. Live-weight loss and its components in Romney ewes subjected to L-thyroxine therapy and a low plane of nutrition. Part I. Effects on live-weight, carcass weight and carcass composition. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 51: 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., & Barton, R. A., 1962. Study of some indices of chemical composition of lamb carcasses. J. Anim. Sci., 21: 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osinska, Z., 1962. Estimation of protein, chemical fat and energy content in pigs. Anim. Prod., 4: 391–398.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., 1962. Statistical Methods, 5th ed., Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H., 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar