Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:59:22.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of beef carcass quality 1. The influence of cereal feeding on the growth and carcass quality of Friesian steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. E. Hinks  and
J. H. D. Prescott
C. E. Hinks
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
J. H. D. Prescott
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access

Summary

Twenty-four Friesian steers, initially 5 months of age, were involved in a 2 × 2 factorial experiment which spanned grazing and silage feeding periods of 22 weeks' duration. In the first period, cattle were stocked at a uniformly high density, with half of the group being fed 1·25 kg/head per day of supplementary barley. In the second period, the cattle were subdivided into four groups and fed varying levels of barley with silage. Finally all the animals received 3·65 kg/head per day of barley. Replicates of the four treatments were slaughtered at random after 5 to 11 weeks on this treatment. Whilst supplementary cereal feeding significantly increased the live-weight gains of steers at grass by 11%, this live-weight advantage was offset by their slower gains in the final weeks before slaughter. Feeding cereals to grazing cattle had little effect on carcass composition or the proportions of carcass joints, but their beef was considered, by a tasting panel, to be more tender than the meat from the control steers.

Increasing the level of barley fed with silage only increased live-weight gains by 2%, and had little effect on carcass or meat quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , December 1972 , pp. 215 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended Procedures in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Kilkenny, J. B., Spedding, A. W. and Tayler, J. C. 1967. An intensive system of beef production from grassland using autumn-born calves from the dairy herd. Joint Beef Production Committee, Handbook No. 1.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. 1968. Genetic and environmental influences on growth in beef cattle. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 429–450. Proc. 14th Nott. Easter School. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Bohmann, V. R. 1955. Compensatory growth in beef cattle: the effect of hay maturity. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1963. Estimation of carcass composition. The anatomical approach. Carcass Composition and Appraisal in Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.). C.S.I.R.O., Australia.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. 1961. Comparative studies of meat. VII. A comparison between Hereford, Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56: 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. 1968. Grazing management in relation to beef production. 5. Effects of feeding supplements to beef cattle on pasture at two intensities of stocking. Ir. J. agric. Res. 7: 105–120.Google Scholar
Conway, A. 1970. Grazing management for beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 92–96.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., McDonald, I. and Fowler, V. R. 1964. The effect of plane of nutrition on the carcass of pigs and lambs when variation in fat content are excluded. Anim. Prod. 6: 141–154.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. 1966. Recent trends in carcase evaluation. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 268–283.Google Scholar
Harte, F. J. 1968a. Effects of plane of nutrition on calves for beef production. 1. Growth rate, feed conversion efficiency, carcass yield and offals. Ir. J. agric. Res. 7: 137–148.Google Scholar
Harte, F. J. 1968b. Effects of plane of nutrition on calves for beef production. 2. Carcass composition and distribution of ‘lean meat’, fat and bone. Ir. J. agric. Res. 7: 149–159.Google Scholar
Henrickson, R. C., Pope, L. S. and Hendrickson, R. F. 1965. Effect of rate of gain of fattening beef calves on carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 507–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinks, C. E. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1973. A note on the prediction of carcass composition in beef cattle. Anim. Prod, (in press).Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. 1948. Rank Correlation Methods. Griffin and Co, London.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. C. J. and Pearce, J. 1964. Some effects of wintering yearling beef cattle on different planes of nutrition. II. Slaughter data and carcass evaluation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Hull, J. L., Weitkamp, W. H. and Bonilla, A. 1965. Compensatory growth responses of fattening steers following various low energy intake regimes on hay or irrigated pasture. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarrick, R. B., Harrington, D. and Conway, A. 1963. The effect of energy restriction between 20-24 months of age on subsequent growth and carcass development of beef cattle. Ir. J. agric. Res. 2: 131–148.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. A. 1957. Effect of plane of intake of total digestible nutrients on the rate and efficiency of gain in identical twin steers. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 38: 987–996.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. 1940. Growth and development in the pig with special reference to carcass quality characters. III. Effects of plane of nutrition on the form and composition of the bacon pig. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30: 511–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. and Verges, J. B. 1952. Effect of plane of nutrition on growth and development and carcass quality in lambs. I. The effects of high and low planes of nutrition at different ages. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42: 1–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A. M. 1966. Desirability of beef. Its characteristics and their measurement. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 843–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D. and Hinks, C. E. 1968. Systems of management and carcass quality of steers. Univ. Newcastle Dept. Agric. Marketing Report, No. 8.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. and Tulloh, N. M. 1968. Developmental growth and body weight loss in cattle. II. Dissected components of the commercially dressed and jointed carcass. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th ed. Iowa State Coll. Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Studemann, J. A., Guenther, J. J., Ewtng, S. A., Morrison, R. D. and O'Dell, G. V. 1968. Effect of nutritional level imposed from birth to 8 months of age on subsequent growth and development patterns of full fed beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1964. The relationship between growth and carcass quality in cattle and sheep. A review. Emp. J. expt. Agric. 32: 191–204.Google Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. 1966. The effects of plane of nutrition in early post-natal life on the subsequent growth and development of cattle. Aust. J. agric. Res. 17: 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1970a. Beef production from grazing and silage with autumn-born calves. 1. The influence of grazing intensity on efficiency of herbage utilization and live-weight gain of cattle. Anim. Prod. 12: 433–442.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1970b. Beef production from grazing and silage with autumn-born calves. 2. The effects on the performance of cattle fed on silage of barley supplementation and of previous grazing. Anim. Prod. 12: 443–450.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. 1958. Effect of nutrition on the growth and development of the East African dwarf goat. II. Effects on the composition of female kids. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57: 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Osbourn, D. F. 1960. Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biol. Rev. 35: 324–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winchester, C. F. and Howe, P. E. 1955. Relative effects of continuous and interrupted growth on beef steers. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric, No. 1108.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. 1964. Starvation changes and subsequent recovery of adult beef muscle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar