Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:14:28.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The voluntary intake and digestibility of straw diets and the performance of wether sheep as influenced by formaldehyde treatment of soya-bean meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. P. Alawa  and
R. G. Hemingway
J. P. Alawa
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
R. G. Hemingway
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
Get access

Abstract

In two experiments, straw diets were supplemented with a concentrate mixture containing either untreated or formaldehyde-treated soya-bean meal. In experiment 1, adult wether sheep were given straw/concentrate mixtures in a 3:1 ratio (air-dry basis) in restricted amounts. In experiment 2, these proportions were adjusted to 3:2 and the growing lambs were offered straw at proportionately 0·05 to 0·1 greater than that eaten daily.

In experiment 1, formaldehyde treatment of soya-bean meal depressed apparent nitrogen (N) digestibility (P < 0·001) although diet organic-matter digestibility was not affected. Formaldehyde treatment also tended to reduce N retention in experiment 1, whereas with growing lambs in experiment 2, it led to improved N retention. Plasma urea concentrations were reduced as a result of formaldehyde treatment of soya-bean meal. Digested N was more efficiently utilized by sheep given the treated soya-bean meal diet in experiment 2 but not in experiment 1. Lambs given the treated soya-bean meal diet tended to gain more live weight with marginally superior food conversion ratios while consuming similar amounts of dry matter as those given the untreated soya-bean meal-supplemented diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 105 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Amos, H. E., Burdick, D. and Huber, T. L. 1974. Effects of formaldehyde treatment of sunflower and soybean meal on nitrogen balance in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 38: 702–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. and Balch, C. C. 1962. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The effect of urea on voluntary intake of oat straw. Br. J. Nutr. 16: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. 1961. Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute. Bull. Commonw. Bur. Pastures Field Crops No. 45.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Ref. Book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Roffler, R. E., Schwab, C. G. and Satter, L. D. 1976. Relationship between ruminal ammonia and nonprotein nitrogen utilization by ruminants. III. Influence of intraruminal urea infusion on ruminal ammonia concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 80–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satter, L. D. and Slyter, L. L. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br J. Nutr. 32: 199–208.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. P., Benevenga, N. J. and Jorgensen, N. A. 1973. Effects of formaldehyde, glyoxal or hexamethylenetetramine treatment of soybean meal on nitrogen utilization and growth in rats and in vitro rumen ammonia release. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 1238–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, S. P., Jorgensen, N. A., Benevenga, N. J. and Brungardt, V. H. 1973. Comparison of soybean meal, formaldehyde treated soybean meal, urea and starea for steers. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 1233–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, J. W., Hatfield, E. E. and Clark, J. H. 1980. Influence of formaldehyde treatment of soybean meal on performance of growing steers and protein availability in the chick. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 750–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R. and Wilson, Agnes G. 1968. The composition of rumen fluid from cows fed biuret and urea. J. Dairy Res. 35: 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar